An integrated fuzzy risk assessment for seaport operations

Safety Science

Volumn 68, Issue , 2014, Pages 180-194

  John, Andrew ^a   Paraskevadakis, Dimitrios ^a   Bury, Alan ^a   Yang, Zaili ^a   Riahi, Ramin ^a   Wang, Jin ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evidential reasoning approach; Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process; Fuzzy set theory; Seaport operations

Indexed keywords

FUZZY SET THEORY;

COLLABORATIVE MODELLING; COMPLEX STRUCTURE; EVIDENTIAL REASONING APPROACHES; FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS; ROBUST APPROACHES; SEAPORT OPERATIONS; STEP-BY-STEP ANALYSIS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; FUZZY SYSTEM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SHIP; SHIPPING; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 84899537370     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ABS, American Bureau of Shipping, 2003. A Guide for Risk Evaluation for the Classification of Marine-related Facilities. ABS Plaza, 16855 Northchase Drive Houston, TX 77060, USA.
2. An M., Huang S., Baker C. Railway risk assessment-the fuzzy reasoning approach and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approaches: a case study of shunting at Waterloo depot. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engr., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 2007, 221(3):365-383.
3. Berle Ø., Asbjørnslett B.E., Rice J.B. Formal vulnerability assessment of a maritime transportation system. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96(6):696-705.
4. Bichou, K., 2008. Security and Risk-based Models in Shipping and Ports: Review and Critical Analysis. OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Paper.
5. Bilgiç, T., Turksen, I.B., 1999. Measurement of membership functions: theoretical and empirical work. In: Dubois, D., Prade, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets, vol. 1. pp. 195-232.
6. Buckley J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1985, 17(3):233-247.
7. Chen S.J., Hwang C.L. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making 1992, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
8. Christopher K. Port Security Management: Auerbach Publications 2010, Taylor and Francis Group, Florida.
9. Contini, S., Scheer, S., Wilikens, M., 2000. Sensitivity analysis for system design improvement. In: Proceeding of International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
10. Dempster A.P. A generalization of Bayesian inference. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 1968, 205-247.
11. Ferriere D., Pysareva K., Rucinski A. Using technology to bridge maritime security gaps: identifying marine transportation vulnerabilities and countermeasures. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113(12):53-57.
12. Fritelli, J., 2005. Port and Maritime Security: Background Issues for Congress. CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Order code RL31733.
13. Fu, L.Q., Li, C.H., 2010. Fuzzy evaluation in fire risk assessment on large public entertainment areas. In: Proceeding of the 7th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2010).
14. Handley-Schachler M., Navare J. Port risk management and public private partnerships: factors relating to risk allocation and risk sustainability. World Rev. Intermod. Transp. Res. 2010, 3(1):150-166.
15. Hultin, J.M., Pennotti, M., Ullman, H., Stevens, L.A., 2004. Securing the Port of New York and New Jersey: Network-centric Operations Applied to the Campaign Against Terrorism.
16. John, A., 2013. Proactive Risk Management of Maritime Infrastructure Systems: Resilience Engineering Perspectives. PhD Thesis. Liverpool John Moores University.
17. Khan F.I., Haddara M.M. Risk-based maintenance: a quantitative approach for maintenance/inspection scheduling and planning. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2003, 16:561-573.
18. Khan F.I., Sadiq R., Husain T. Risk-based process safety assessment and control measures design for offshore process facilities. J. Hazard. Mater. 2002, 94:1-32.
19. King J. The security of merchant shipping. Mar. Policy 2005, 29(3):235-245.
20. Kleiner Y., Sadiq R., Rajani B. Modelling the deterioration of buried infrastructure as a fuzzy Markov. J. Water Suppl. Res. Technol.: Aqua 2006, 55:67-80.
21. Kleiner Y., Sadiq R., Rajani B. Failure risk management of buried infrastructure using fuzzy-based. J. Water Suppl. Res. Technol.: Aqua 2006, 55:81-94.
22. Klir G.J., Yuan B. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications 1995, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
23. Krishnasamy K., Haddara M. Development of a risk-based maintenance (RBM) strategy for a power-generation plant. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2005, 18:69-81.
24. Kröger W. Critical infrastructures at risk: a need for a new conceptual approach and extended analytical tools. Reliab. Engr. Syst. Saf. 2008, 93(12):1781-1787.
25. Lee H.M. Group decision making fuzzy set theory for evaluating the rate of aggregative risk in software development. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1996, 80:261-271.
26. Li Y., Liao X. Decision support for risk analysis on dynamic alliance. Decis. Support Syst. 2007, 42:2043-2059.
27. Mansouri M., Nilchiani R., Mostashari A. A policy making framework for resilient port infrastructure systems. Mar. Policy 2010, 34(6):1125-1134.
28. Mantaras R.L.D. Approximate Reasoning Models 1990, Prentice Hall PTR.
29. McGill W.L., Ayyub B.M., Kaminskiy M. Risk analysis for critical asset protection. Risk Anal. 2007, 27(5):1265-1281.
30. Meersman, H.E., Van, de V., Vanelslander, T., 2009. Future Challenges in the Port and Shipping Sector, the Grammenos Informa London.
31. Miri Lavasani S.M., Yang Z., Finlay J., Wang J. Fuzzy risk assessment of oil and gas wells. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2011, 89:277-294.
32. Mokhtari K., Ren J., Roberts C., Wang J. Application of a generic bow-tie based risk analysis framework on risk management of sea ports and offshore terminals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192(2):465-475.
33. Moteff, J., Parfomak, P., 2004. Critical Infrastructure and Key Assets: Definition and Identification. CRS Report for Congress. Order Code RL32631.
34. Nair R., Avetisyan H., Miller-Hooks E. Resilience framework for ports and other intermodal components. J. Transp. Res. Board 2010, 2166(1):54-65.
35. Ngai E.W.T., Wat F.K.T. Fuzzy decision support system for risk analysis in e-commerce development. J. Decision Supp. Syst. 2005, 40:235-255.
36. Nilchiani, R., Mostashari, A., 2008. An Introduction to Resilience in Port Infrastructure Systems. White Paper Series. Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken.
37. Perrow C. Normal Accidents 1984, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
38. Pillary, A., Wang, J., 2003. Technology for Safety of Marine Systems. Elsevier Ocean Engineering Book Series, vol. 7.
39. Raymond C.Z. Maritime terrorism in Southeast Asia: a risk assessment. Terror. Polit. Viol. 2006, 18(2):239-257.
40. Reason J. Human Error 1990, Cambridge University Press.
41. Riahi R., Bonsall S., Jenkinson I., Wang J. A seafarer's reliability assessment incorporating subjective judgements. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs. Part M: J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 2012, 226(4):313-334.
42. Rosenberg D., Chung C. Maritime security in the South China Sea: coordinating coastal and user state priorities. Ocean Dev. Int. Law 2008, 39(1):51-68.
43. Saaty T.L. How to make decisions; the analytical hierarchy process. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 1990, 48(1):9-26.
44. Sadiq R., Kleiner Y., Rajani B. Aggregative risk analysis for water quality failure in distribution networks. Aqua-J. Water Suppl.: Res. Technol. 2004, 53:241-261.
45. Sadiq R., Saint-Martin E., Kleiner Y. Predicting risk of water quality failure in distribution networks under uncertainties using fault-tree analysis. Urban Water J. 2008, 00:1-18.
46. Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence 1976, vol. 1. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
47. Slater R., Force M.T. An assessment of the US Marine Transportation System: A Report to Congress 1999, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
48. Taneja P., Ligteringen H., Van Schuylenburg M. Dealing with uncertainty in design of port infrastructure systems. J. Des. Res. 2010, 8(2):101-118.
49. Tang, M.T., Tzeng, G.H., 1998. A Hierarchy Fuzzy MCDM Method for Studying Electronic Marketing Strategies in the Information Service Industry.
50. Tao, C., Huabing, Z., Honglong, Z., Yufeng, Y., Xin, W., 2012. Quantitative hazop risk analysis for oil tank using the fuzzy set. In: Proceeding of the 9th International Pipeline Conference IPC 2012, September 24-28, Calgary, Albata, Canada.
51. Vanem E., Antao P., Ostvik I., Decomas F.D.C. Analysing the risk of LNG carrier operations. Reliab. Engr. Syst. Saf. 2008, 93(9):1328-1344.
52. Wang J., Trbojevic V. Design for safety of marine and offshore systems 2007, Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology, London, UK, ISBN:1-902536-58-4.
53. Wang J., Yang J., Sen P. Safety analysis and synthesis using fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning. Reliab. Engr. Syst. Saf. 1995, 47(2):103-118.
54. Yager R.R. On the determination of strength of belief for decision support under uncertainty Part II: fusing strengths of belief. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2004, 142(1):129-142.
55. Yang J.B. Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2001, 131(1):31-61.
56. Yang J.B., Xu D.L. On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. Syst. Man Cybernet. Part A: Syst. Hum. IEEE Trans. 2002, 32(3):289-304.
57. Yang Z., Wang J., Bonsall S., Fang Q. Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment. Risk Anal. 2009, 29(1):95-120.