Digital media and disciplinarity

Information Society

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 249-256

  Sterne, Jonathan ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cultural studies; Digital media studies; Disciplinary; Discipline; Internet studies; Michel Foucault; New media studies; Pierre Bourdieu; Sociology of knowledge

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144456527     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240591007562     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Abbate, Janet. 2000. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1992. Intimations of postmodernity. New York: Routledge.
3. Bennett, Tony. 1997. Culture: A reformer's science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Bolter, Jay, and Grusin, Richard. 2000. Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo academicus, trans. P. Collier. New York: Polity Press.
6. Bourdieu, Pierre, Chamboredon, Jean-Claude, and Passeron, Jean-Claude. 1991. The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries, trans. R. Nice. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
7. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loic J. D. 1993. An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Ceruzzi, Paul. 2003. History of modern computing, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Collins, Harry, and Pinch, Trevor. 1998. The golem at large: What everyone should know about technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Cowan, Ruth Schwartz. 1983. More work for mother: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.
11. Crawford, Alice. 2003. The city in the future perfect: Information technology, utopianism and urban life. PhD dissertation, Communication, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
12. Davis, Nuel Pharr. 1968. Lawrence and Oppenheimer. New York: Simon and Schuster.
13. Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Felix. 1994. What is philosophy?, trans. by H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Dominguez, Virginia. 1996. Disciplining anthropology. In Disciplinarity and dissent in cultural studies, eds. C. Nelson and D. P. Gaonkar, pp. 37-61. New York: Routledge.
15. Edwards, Paul. 1996. The closed world: Computers and the politics of discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.
17. Fuller, Steve. 1993. Disciplinary boundaries and the rhetoric of the social sciences. In Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity, eds. E. Messer-Davidow, D. Shumway, and D. Sylvan, pp. 125-149. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
18. Gibson-Graham, J. K. 1996. The end of capitalism (as we knew it). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
19. Gitelman, Lisa, ed. 2003. New media 1740-1915. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Gregory, Derek. 1994. Geographical imaginations. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
21. Hartley, John. 1991. Popular reality: A (hair) brush with cultural studies. Continuum 4(2):5-18.
22. Hay, James. 2000. Unaided virtues: The (neo-)liberalization of the domestic sphere. Television and New Media 1(1):53-73.
23. Hay, James. 2001. Locating the televisual. Television and New Media 2(3):205-234.
24. Jones, Steve. 1993. A sense of space: Virtual reality, authenticity and the aural. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10:238-252.
25. Latour, Bruno. 1996. Aramis, or the love of technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Levy, Mark. 1989. The VCR age. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27. Manovich, Lev. 2001. The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Messer-Davidow, Ellen, Shumway, David, and Sylvan, David. 1993. Disciplinary ways of knowing. In Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity, eds. E. Messer-Davidow, D. Shumway, and D. Sylvan, pp. 1-21. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
29. Mowitt, John. 1992. Text: The genealogy of an antidisciplinary object. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
30. Mumford, Lewis. 1934. Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
31. Negroponte, Nicholas. 1995. Being digital. New York: Knopf.
32. Nelson, Cary, and Gaonkar, Dilip Parameshwar. 1996. Cultural studies and the politics of disciplinarity: An introduction. In Disciplinarity and dissent in cultural studies, eds. C. Nelson and D. P. Gaonkar, pp. 1-19. New York: Routledge.
33. Pinch, Trevor, and Bijker, Wiebe. 1984. The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science 14:399-441.
34. Schiller, Dan. 1999. Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Slack, Jennifer Daryl. 1984. Communication technologies and society: Conceptions of causality and the politics of technological intervention. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. Slack, Jennifer Daryl, and Fejes, Fred, eds. 1987. Ideologies of the information age. Norwood: Ablex.
37. Sosnoski, James. 1993. Examining exams. In Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity, eds. E. Messer-Davidow, D. Shumway, and D. Sylvan. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
38. Sterne, Jonathan. 1999. Thinking the Internet: Cultural studies vs. the Millennium. In Doing internet research, ed. S. Jones. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Vico, Giambattista. 1984. The new science of Giambattista Vico, trans. T. Bergin and M. Fisch. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40. Wise, J. MacGregor. 1997. Exploring technology and social space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.