Ethnomethodological architectures: Information systems driven by cultural and community visions

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 723-733

  Srinivasan, Ramesh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ETHNOMETHODOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURES; SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DATABASE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 33947403138     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20544     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Albrechtsen, H., & Jacob, E. (1998, August). The role of classificatory structures as boundary objects in information ecologies. In W. Mustafa-Elhadi & S. Pollitt (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International ISKO Conference (pp. 30-36). Frankfurt. Germany: Ergon Verlag.
2. Appadurai, A. (1998a). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. In Modernity at large cultural dimensions of globalization (pp. 27-47). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3. Appadurai, A. (1998b). The production of locality. In Modernity at large cultural dimensions of globalization (pp. 178-200). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4. Ausubel, J.H., & Herman, R. (Eds.). (1998). Cities and their vital systems: Infrastructure, past, present, and future. Washington, DC: National Academy.
5. Beghtol, C., Howarth, L., & Williamson. N.J. (Eds.). (2000). Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization. In Proceedings of the Sixth International ISKO Conference: Advances in Knowledge Organization, no. 7 (pp. 268-274). Würzburg, Germany: Ergon.
6. Bishop, A., Mehra, B., Bazzell, I., & Smith. C. (2000). Socially grounded user studies in digital library development. First Monday 5(6).
7. Boast, R., Bravo, M., & Srinivasan, R. (in press). Return to Babel; Emergent diversity, digital resources, and local knowledge. The Information Society.
8. Bodker, S. (1996). Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development. Human Computer Interaction, 11. 215-236.
9. Bodker, S., & Gronbaek, K. (1996). Users and designers in mutual activity: An analysis of cooperative activities in systems design. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 130-158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Borgman, C. (2000). From Gutenberg to global information infrastructure: Access to information in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Bowker, G.C., & Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Curroll, J.M., & Rosson, M.B. (2001). Better home shopping or new democracy? Evaluating community network outcomes. Paper presented at CHI 2001. Seattle.
13. Crabtree, A. (1998). Ethnography in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 1998 Participatory Design Conference (pp. 93-105). Seattle: Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility.
14. Crabtree, A., Niehols, D.M., O'Brien, J., Rouncefield, M., & Twidale, M.B. (2000). Ethnomethodologically informed ethnography and IS design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 666-682.
15. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Ginsburg, F., Abu-Lughod, L., & Larkin, B. (2002). Media worlds: Anthropology on new terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78, 1360-1380.
18. Gurstein, M. (Ed.). (2000). Community informatics: Enabling communities with information and communications technologies. Hershey. PA: Idea Group.
19. Hammersley, M., & P. Atkinson (1983). Ethnography: Principles and practice. London: Tavistock.
20. Harris, T.M., Weiner, D., Warner T., & Levin, R. (1995). Pursuing social goals through participatory GIS: Redressing South Africa's historical political ecology. In J. Pickles (Ed.), Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems (pp. 196-222). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Hill, L.L., Carver, L., Larsgaard, M., Dolin, R., Smith, T.R., Frew, J., et al. (2000). Alexandria Digital Library: User evaluation studies and system design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(3). 246-259.
22. Jacob, E. (1999). The everyday world of work: Two approaches to the classification in context. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 76-99.
23. Jacob, E.K., & Albrechtsen, H. (1997, June). Constructing reality: The role of dialogue in the development of classificatory structures. In I.C. McIlwaine (Ed.), Knowledge organization for information retrieval: Proceedings of the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (pp. 42-50). The Hague: International Federation for Documentation.
24. Kim, A.J. (2000). Community building on the Web: Secret strategies for successful online communities. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
25. Kindon, S. (2000). (Re)framing and (re)presenting: Participatory community video in geographic research. In M. Roche. M. McKenna, & P. Hesp (Eds.), Proceedings of 20th New Zealand Geography Conference (pp. 175-178). Palmerston: Massey University.
26. Kyng, M. (1995). Creating contexts for design. In Carroll, J.M. (Ed.). Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development (pp. 85-108). New York: Wiley.
27. Olson, H.A. (1998). Mapping beyond Dewey's boundaries: Constructing classificatory space for marginalized knowledge domains. In G.C. Bowker & S.L. Star (Eds.). How classifications work: Problems and challenges in an electronic age. Library Trends, 47(2). 233-254.
28. Preece, J. (1999). Empathy online. Virtual Reality. 4, 1-11.
29. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability and supporting sociability. Chiehester, United Kingdom: Wiley.
30. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
31. Reardon, K.M. (1998). Participatory action research as service learning. In R.A. Rhoads & J.P.F Howard (Eds.). Academic service learning: A pedagogy of action and reflection (pp. 57-64). San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
32. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading. MA: Addison Wesley.
33. Sassen, S. (1997). Electronic space and power. Journal of Urban Technology, 4(1), 1-17.
34. Srinivasan, R. (2000). Village voice: Expressing narrative through community designed ontologies. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, Program in Media Arts and Sciences.
35. Srinivasan, R. (2004). Reconstituting the urban through community-articulated digital environments. In Journal of Urban Technology. New York: Taylor & Francis.
36. Srinivasan, R. (2005). Weaving spatial, digital and ethnographic processes in community-driven media design. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Graduate School of Design, Harvard University.
37. Srinivasan, R. (2006a). Indigenous, ethnic, and cultural articulations of new media, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(4), 497-518.
38. Srinivasan, R. (2006b). Where community voice and information society intersect. The Information Society, 22(5).
39. Srinivasan, R., & Huang, J. (2005). Fluid ontologies for digital museums. Journal for Digital Libraries, 5(3), 193-204.
40. Star, S.L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M.N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence. London: Pitman.
41. Warschauer, M. (2003). Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American 289(2), 42-47.
42. Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyber place: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25(2), 227-252.
43. Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Whittaker, S., Isaacs, E., & O'Day, V. (1997). Widening the Net. SIGCHI Bulletin, 29.
45. Woolgar, S. (2002). Virtual society? Get real! The social science of electronic technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.