Sites unseen: Ethnographic research in a textual community

International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 565-578

  Eichhorn, Kate ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008770545     PISSN: 09518398     EISSN: 13665898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09518390110047075     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bishop, R. (1994). Initiating empowering research? New Zealand Journal of Educational Research, 29(1).
2. Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of psychological gender, gender-related perceptions, significant others, and the introducer of technology upon computer anxiety in students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18, 63-78.
3. Bruner, C., & Bennett, D. (1997). Technology and gender: Differences in masculine and feminine views. Technology and Learning, November, 46-51.
4. Bryson, M., & deCastell, S. (1995). A chip on her shoulder? New technologies, gender & in/equity. Women's Education, 11 (3), 15-23.
5. Bryson, M., & deCastell, S. (1996). Learning to make a difference: Gender, new technologies, and in/ equity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2 (1), 3-21.
6. Clifford, J. (1997). Routes: Travel and translation in the late twentieth century. New York: Routledge.
7. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G.E. (Eds.) (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Fay, B. (1977). How people change themselves: The relationship between critical theory and its audience. In Political theory and praxis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Fuss, D. (1989). Essentially speaking Feminism, nature, and difference. New York: Routledge.
11. Geertz, C. (1995). After the fact: Two countries, four decades, one anthropologist,. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Gipson, J. (1997). Girls and computer technology: Barrier or key? Educational Technology, March-April, 41-43.
13. Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997a). Anthropological locations: Boundaries and grounds of afield science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14. Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997b). Culture, power and place: Explorations in critical anthropology. Durham: Duke University Press.
15. Haig-Brown, C. (1992). Choosing border work. Canadian Journal of Native Studies, 19 (1), 96-116.
16. Hakken, D. (1999). Cyborgs@Cyberspace: An ethnographer looks to the future. New York: Routledge, 1999.
17. Jones, S. (1999). Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
18. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.
19. Lyman, P. & Wakeford, N. (Eds.) (1999). Analyzing virtual societies: New directions in methodology (SpecialIssue). American Behavioral Sientist, 43 (3).
20. Marcus, G.E. (1986). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95-117.
21. Penley, C. & Ross, A. (Eds.) (1991). Technoculture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
22. Sanjek, R. (1990). Fieldnotes: The makings of anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23. Stock, B. (1983). The implications of literacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Suchman, L. et al. (1999). Reconstructing technologies as social practice. American Behavioral Scientist, 43 (3), 392-408.
25. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Wolf, M. (1992). A thrice told tale: Feminism, postmodernism & ethnographic responsibility. Stanford: Stanford University Press.