On Predicting Sociodemographic Traits and Emotions from Communications in Social Networks and Their Implications to Online Self-Disclosure

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 726-736

  Volkova, Svitlana ^a   Bachrach, Yoram ^b  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; EDUCATION; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIFE SATISFACTION; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; MODEL; OPTIMISM; PRIVACY; SADNESS; SELF DISCLOSURE; SOCIAL NETWORK; ADULT; AGE; EMOTION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THEORETICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; COMMUNICATION; DISCLOSURE; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SELF DISCLOSURE; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORKING; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84949936596     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0609     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Cozby PC. Self-disclosure: a literature review. Psychological Bulletin 1973; 79:73
2. Derlaga VJ, Berg JH. (1987) Self-disclosure: theory, research and therapy. Springer Science & Business Media. New York: Plenum Press
3. Hill CE, Knox S. Self-disclosure. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 2001; 38:413
4. Bazarova NN, Yoon HC. Self-disclosure in social media: extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. Journal of Communication 2014; 64:635-657
5. Bamman D, Eisenstein J, Schnoebelen T. Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics 2014; 18:135-160
6. Bachrach Y, Kosinski M, Graepel T, et al. (2012) Personality and patterns of Facebook usage. In Proceedings of WebSci, pp. 24-32. Evanston IL, USA
7. Kosinski M, Stillwell D, Graepel T. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110. 15 (2013): 5802-5805
8. Moira B, Marlow C, Lento T. (2010) Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI, pp. 1909-1912. Atlanta, GA, USA
9. Scott J. (2012). Social network analysis. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
10. Tufekci Z. Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 2008; 28(1):20-36
11. Qian H, Scott CR. Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 12:1428-1451
12. Li-Barber KT. Self-disclosure and student satisfaction with Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 2012; 28:624-630
13. Velasco-Martin J. (2011) Self-disclosure in social media. In Proceedings of CHI. ACM. pp. 1057-1060. Vancouver, BC, Canada
14. Acquisti A, Ralph G. Predicting social security numbers from public data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A 2009; 106:10975-10980
15. Wolf A. Emotional expression online: gender differences in emoticon use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior 2000; 3: 827-833
16. Nunn JS, Thomas SL. The angrymale and the passive female: the role of gender and self-esteem in anger expression. Social Behavior and Personality 1999; 27:145-153
17. Newman JL, Gray EA, Dale R. Sex differences in the relationship of anger and depression: an empirical study. Journal of Counseling and Development 1999; 77:198-203
18. Eisler RM, Skidmore JR, Ward CH. Masculine gender-role stress: predictor of anger, anxiety, and health-risk behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment 1988; 52:133-141
19. Schienle A, Schafer A, Rudolf S, et al. Gender differences in the processing of disgust-and fear-inducing pictures: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 2005; 16:277-280
20. Haidt J, McCauley C, Rozin P. Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: a scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual differences 1994; 16:701-713
21. Kahneman D, Deaton A. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A 2010; 107:16489-16493
22. Kushlev K, Elizabeth WD, Lucas RE. Higher income is associated with less daily sadness but not more daily happiness. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2015. DOI: 10. 1177/1948550614568161
23. Reyes LR, Meininger JC, Liehr P, et al. Anger in adolescents: sex, ethnicity, age differences, and psychometric properties. Nursing Research 2003; 52:2-11
24. Ross CE, Van Willigen M. Gender, parenthood, and anger. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1996; 572-584
25. Yum Y, Kazuya H. Computer-mediated relationship development: a cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2005; 11:133-152
26. McCarthy A. Social penetration theory, social networking and Facebook. 2009
27. McKenna KY, Bargh JA. Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2000; 4:57-75
28. Sheldon P. I'll poke you. You'll poke me! Self-disclosure, social attraction, predictability and trust as important predictors of Facebook relationships. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 2009; 3(2): 67-75
29. Krasnova H, Kolesnikova E, Guenther O. (2009) It won't happen to me!: self-disclosure in online social networks. Proceedings of AMCIS, p. 343. San Francisco, CA, USA
30. Chen R, Sharma SK. Self-disclosure at social networking sites: an exploration through relational capitals. Information Systems Frontiers 2013; 15(2):269-278
31. Trepte S, Reinecke L. The reciprocal effects of social network site use and the disposition for self-disclosure: a longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior 2013; 29:1102-1112
32. Dindia K, Allen M. Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1992; 112:106
33. Farber BA. (2006) Self-disclosure in psychotherapy. Guilford Press. New York, NY
34. Ignatius E, Kokkonen M. Factors contributing to verbal self-disclosure. Nordic Psychology 2007; 59:362-391
35. Snyder M. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1974; 30:526
36. Shaffer DR, Smith JE, Tomarelli M. Self-monitoring as a determinant of self-disclosure reciprocity during the acquaintance process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1982; 43:163
37. Solano CH, Dunnam M. Two's company: self-disclosure and reciprocity in triads versus dyads. Social Psychology Quarterly 1985; 48(2):183-187
38. Forgas JP. Affective influences on self-disclosure: mood effects on the intimacy and reciprocity of disclosing personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2011; 100:449
39. Altman I, Taylor D. (1973) Social penetration theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Mnston
40. Mohammad SM, Kiritchenko S. Using nuances of emotion to identify personality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309. 6352
41. Volkova S, Coppersmith G, Van Durme B. (2014) Inferring user political preferences from streaming communications. In Proceedings of ACL, pp. 186-196. Baltimore, MD, USA
42. Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion 1992; 6:169-200
43. Goodman LA. Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1961; 148-170
44. Coviello L, Sohn Y, Kramer AD, et al. Detecting emotional contagion in massive social networks. PLoS One 2014; 9:e90315
45. Callison-Burch C. (2009) Fast, cheap, and creative: evaluating translation quality using Amazon's Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 286-295. Singapore
46. González-Ibáñez R, Muresan S, Wacholder N. (2011) Identifying sarcasm in Twitter: a closer look. In Proceedings of ACL HLT, pp. 581-586. Portland, OR, USA
47. Mohammad SM, Kiritchenko S. Using hashtags to capture fine emotion categories from tweets. Computational Intelligence 31. 2 (2015):301-326
48. Wang W, Chen L, Thirunarayan K, et al. (2012) Harnessing Twitter ''big data'' for automatic emotion identification. In Proceedings of SocialCom, pp. 587-592. Amsterdam, The Netherlands
49. Hassan S, Fernandez YH, Alani H. (2013) Evaluation datasets for Twitter sentiment analysis: a survey and a new dataset, the STS-Gold. First ESSEM Workshop. Turin, Italy
50. Desmet PM. (2002) Designing emotion. Delft University of Technology. Department of Industrial Design
51. Roberts K, Roach MA, Johnson J, et al. (2012) Empatweet: annotating and detecting emotions on Twitter. In Proceedings of LREC. Istanbul, Turkey
52. Kim S, Bak J, Oh AH. (2012) Do you feel what I feel? Social aspects of emotions in Twitter conversations. In Proceedings of ICWSM. Dublin, Ireland
53. Pak A, Paroubek P. (2010) Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of LREC. Malta
54. Smith NA. (2004) Tutorial: log-linear models
55. Bishop CM. (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning (information science and statistics). Secaucus, NJ: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc
56. Rao D, Yarowsky D, Shreevats A, et al. (2010) Classifying latent user attributes in Twitter. In Proceedings of SMUC, pp. 37-44. Toronto, Canada
57. Burger JD, Henderson J, Kim G, et al. (2011) Discriminating gender on Twitter. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1301-1309. Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
58. Van Durme B. (2012) Streaming analysis of discourse participants. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 48-58. Jeju Island, Korea
59. Ciot M, Sonderegger M, Ruths D. (2013) Gender inference of Twitter users in non-English contexts. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 1136-1145. Seattle, WA, USA
60. Nguyen D, Gravel R, Trieschnigg D, et al. (2013) How old do you think I am? A study of language and age in Twitter. In Proceedings of ICWSM, pp. 439-448. Boston, MA, USA
61. Cohen R, Ruths D. (2013) Classifying political orientation on Twitter: it's not easy! In Proceedings of ICWSM. Boston, MA, USA
62. Volkova S, Bachrach Y, Armstrong M, et al. (2015) Inferring latent user properties from texts published in social media. In Proceedings of AAAI. Austin, TX, USA
63. Pennacchiotti M, Popescu AM. (2011) A machine learning approach to Twitter user classification. In Proceedings of ICWSM, pp. 281-288. Barcelona, Spain
64. Conover MD, Ratkiewicz J, Francisco M, et al. (2011) Political polarization on Twitter. In Proceedings of ICWSM, pp. 89-96. Barcelona, Spain
65. Zamal FA, Liu W, Ruths D. (2012) Homophily and latent attribute inference: inferring latent attributes of Twitter users from neighbors. In Proceedings of ICWSM, pp. 387-390. Dublin, Ireland
66. Mohammad SM, Yang T. (2011) Tracking sentiment in mail: how genders differ on emotional axes. In Proceedings of WASSA, pp. 70-79. Portland, OR, USA
67. Volkova S, Wilson T, Yarowsky D. (2013) Exploring demographic language variations to improve sentiment analysis in social media. In Proceedings of EMNLP. Seattle, WA, USA
68. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. JMLR 2011; 12:2825-2830
69. Logistic regression in scikit-learn: http://scikit-learn. org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn. linear-model. Logistic Regression. html
70. Pang B, Lee L, Vaithyanathan S. (2002) Thumbs up?: sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 79-86. Philadelphia, PA, USA
71. Mohammad SM, Kiritchenko S, Zhu X. (2013) NRCCanada: building the state-of-the-art in sentiment analysis of tweets. In Proceedings of SemEval pp. 321-327, Atlanta, GA, USA
72. OwoputiO,O'Connor B,Dyer C, et al. (2013) Improved part-ofspeech tagging for online conversational textwith word clusters. In Proceedings of NAACL, pp. 380-390. Montreal, Canada
73. Nakov P, Rosenthal S, Kozareva Z, et al. (2013) Semeval-2013 Task 2: sentiment analysis in Twitter. In Proceedings of SemEval, pp. 312-320. Atlanta, GA, USA
74. Bergsma S, Dredze M, Van Durme B, et al. (2013) Broadly improving user classification via communication-based name and location clustering on Twitter. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 1010-1019. Atlanta, GA, USA
75. Preot xiuc-Pietro D, Volkova S, Lampos V, et al. Studying user income through language, behaviour and affect in social media. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0138717
76. Maeve D, Brenner J. (2012) The demographics of social media users, Vol. 14. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, 2013
77. Correa T, Amber WH, Homero GZ. Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior 2010; 26:247-253
78. Goode E. Happiness may grow with aging, study finds. www . nytimes. com/1998/10/27/science/happiness-may-grow-withaging-study-finds. html (accessed Oct. 27, 1998)
79. Kern ML, Eichstaedt JC, Schwartz HA, et al. From sooo excited!!! to so proud: using language to study development. Developmental Psychology 2014; 50:178
80. Schütz E, Sailer U, Nima AA, et al. The affective profiles in the USA: happiness, depression, life satisfaction, and happiness-increasing strategies. Peer J 2013; 1:e156
81. Grover R. Relationships and happiness. www. facebook . com/notes/facebook-data-team/relationships-and-happiness/304457453858 (accessed Feb. 4, 2010)
82. Open Science Collaboration. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 2015; 349:aac4716.