Heuristics in managing complex clinical decision tasks in experts' decision making

Proceedings - 2014 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics, ICHI 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 186-193

  Islam, Roosan ^a   Weir, Charlene ^a   Del Fiol, Guilherme ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support; clinical decision support design; clinical reasoning; cognitive task analysis; complex clinical cases; critical decision method; decision task in medicine; experts decision making; heuristics; task complexity

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; JOB ANALYSIS;

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT; CLINICAL REASONING; COGNITIVE TASK ANALYSIS; COMPLEX CLINICAL CASES; DECISION METHOD; DECISION TASK; HEURISTICS; TASK COMPLEXITY;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84949924049     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICHI.2014.32     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Shibl, R., M. Lawley, and J. Debuse, Factors influencing decisi on support system acceptance. Decision Support Systems, 2013. 54(2): P. 953-961.
2. Shah, A.K. And D.M. Oppenheimer, Heuristics made easy: An effort-reduction framework. Psychol Bull, 2008. 134(2): P. 207-22.
3. Patel V.L. D.R. Kaufman T.G. Kannampallil Diagnostic Reasoning and Decision Making in the Context of Health Information Technology Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2013. 8 1 149-190.
4. Dowie, J. And A. Elstein, Professional judgment: A reader in clinical decision making. 1988: Cambridge University Press.
5. Kahneman, D., T hinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus & Giroux., 2011.
6. Kahneman, D. And G. Klein, Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. Am Psychol, 2009. 64(6): P. 515-26.
7. Proust, J., Metacognition. Philosophy Compass, 2010. 5(11): P. 989-998.
8. Marcum, J.A., An integrated model of clinical reasoning: Dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2012. 18(5): P. 954-961.
9. Gigerenzer, G. And W. Gaissmaier, Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 2011. 62: P. 451-482.
10. Gigerenzer, G. And S. Kurzenhä user, Fast and frugal heuristics in medical decision making. Science and medicine in dialogue: Thinking through particulars and universals, 2005: P. 3-15.
11. Gigerenzer, G. And D.G. Goldstein, Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological review, 1996. 103(4): P. 650.
12. Patel, V.L. And J.F. Arocha, The nature of constraints on collaborative decision making in health care settings. Linking Expertise and Naturalistic Decision Making, 2001: P. 383-405.
13. Patel, V.L. And T. Cohen, New perspectives on error in critical care. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2008. 14(4): P. 456-459.
14. Patel, V.L., G.J. Groen, and J.F. Arocha, Medical expertise as a function of task difficulty. Memory and Cognition, 1990. 18(4): P. 394-406.
15. Patel, V.L., et al., Im pact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization, and reasoning. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2000. 7(6): P. 569-585.
16. de Jonge, P., F.J. Huyse, and F.C. Stiefel, Case and care complexity in the medically ill. Med Clin North Am, 2006. 90(4): P. 679-92.
17. Crandall, B., G. Klein, and R. Hoffman, Incident-Based CTA: Hel ping Practitioners " Tell Stories" , in Working Minds: A Practitioners Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis. 2006, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. p. 69-90.
18. Hoffman, R.R., B. Crandall, and N.R. Shadbolt, Use of the Critical Decision Method to Elicit Expert Knowledge: A Case Study in the Methodology of Cognitive Task Analysis. Human Factors, 1998. 40: P. 254-276.
19. Fackler, J.C., et al., Critical care physician cognitive task analysis: An exploratory study. Crit Care, 2009. 13(2): P. R33.
20. Byströ m, K., Task complexity, information types and information sources: Examination of relationships. Task Complexity, Information Types and Information Sources, 1999.
21. Byström, K. And K. Jä rvelin, Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 1995. 31(2): P. 191-213.
22. Vakkari, P., Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage., 1999. 35(6): P. 819-837.
23. Liu, P. And Z. Li, Task complexity: A review and conceptualization framework. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2012. 42(6): P. 553-568.
24. Larkin, J., et al., Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 1980. 208(4450): P. 1335-1342.
25. Patel V.L. J.F. Arocha D.R. Kaufman. A primer on aspects of cognition for medical informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2001. 8. 4. 324-343.
26. Zhang, J. And D.A. Norman, Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 1994. 18(1): P. 87-122.
27. Sintchenko, V. And E.W. Coiera, Which clinical decisions benefit from automation? A task complexity approach. Int J Med Inform, 2003. 70(2- 3): P. 309-16.
28. Fauci, A.S. And D.M. Morens, The perpetual challenge of infectious diseases. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366(5): P. 454-61.
29. Markman, K.D., W.M. Klein, and J.A. Suhr, Handbook of imagination and mental simulation. 2012: Psychology Press.
30. Gigerenzer, G., R. Hertwi g, and T. Pachur, Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior. 2011: Oxford University Press, Inc.
31. Marewski, J.N. And G. Gigerenzer, Heuristic decision making in medicine. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 2012. 14(1): P. 77-89.
32. Tversky, A. And D. Kahneman, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 1974. 185(4157): P. 1124-1131.
33. Croskerry, P., Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: Applications of a dual process model of reasoning. Advances in health sciences education : Theory and practice, 2009. 14 Suppl 1: P. 27-35.
34. Evans, J.S.B.T., Dual-process theories of reasoning: Facts and fallacies. The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning, 2012: P. 115-133.
35. Stanovich, K.E. And R.F. West, Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2000. 23(5): P. 645-726.