The importance of social structure and social interaction in stereotype consensus and content: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 11-23

  Stott, Clifford ^b   Drury, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142266604     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.183     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Bar-Tal, D., & Labin, D. (2001). The effect of a major event on stereotyping: Terrorist attacks in Israel and Israeli adolescents' perceptions of Palestinians, Jordanians and Arabs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 265-280.
3. Bettencourt, B. A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and ingroup bias: A meta analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 520-542.
4. Boen, F., & Vanbeselaere, N. (1998). Reactions upon a failed attempt to enter a high status group: An experimental test of the five stage model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 689-696.
5. Drury, J., & Reicher, S. D. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 579-604.
6. Ellemers, N. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57.
7. Ellemers, N., van Kippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
8. Fiske, S., & Depret, E. (1996). Control, interdependence and power: Understanding social cognition in its social context. European Review of Social Psychology, 7, 31-61.
9. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. (2001). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimising ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. In Jost, & Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy. Cambridge: CUP.
10. Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (2001). A hundred years of certitude? Social psychology, the experimental method and the management of scientific uncertainty. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1-21.
11. Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (2003). Experimental design and causality in social psychological research. In C. Sansone, C. C. Morf, & A. T. Panter (Eds.), Handbook of methods in social psychology (pp. 237-264). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1992). Context dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self categorisation and accentuation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 251-278.
13. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Hayes, B. K. (1992). Context-dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 3-20.
14. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. (1998a). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 203-239.
15. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P., Reynolds, K., Eggins, R., Nolan, N., & Tweedie, J. (1998b). When do stereotypes become really consensual? Investigating the group based dynamics of the consensualisation process. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 755-776.
16. Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P., Reynolds, K., & Doosje, B. (2002). From personal pictures in the head to collective tools in the world: How shared stereotypes allow groups to represent and change social reality. In C. McGarty, V. Y. Yzerbyt, & R. Spears (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanation: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups. Cambridge: CUP.
17. Hogg, M., Turner, J. C., & Davidson, B. (1990). Polarised norms and social frames of reference: A test of the self categorisation theory of group polarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 77-100.
18. Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 59-83.
19. Klein, O., Jacobs, A., Gemoets, S., Licata, L., & Lambert, S. (in press). Hidden profiles and the consensualization of social stereotypes: How information distribution affects stereotype content and sharedness. European Journal of Social Psychology.
20. Oakes, P., Haslam, A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Oakes, P., Reynolds, K., Haslam, A., & Turner, J. (1999). Part of life's rich tapestry: Stereotyping and the politics of intergroup relations. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 125-160.
22. Reicher, S. D. (1996a). Social identity and social change: Rethinking the contexts of social psychology. In P. W. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
23. Reicher, S. D. (1996b). The Battle of Westminster': Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 115-134.
24. Reicher, S. D. (2000). Social identity definition and enactment: A broad SIDE against irrationalism and relativism. In T. Postmes, R. Spears, M. Lea., & S. D. Reicher (Eds.), SIDE issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups (pp. 175-190). Amsterdam: Proceedings of the Dutch Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences.
25. Reynolds, K., Oakes, P., Haslam, A., Nolan, M., & Dolnik, L. (2000). Responses to powerlessness: Stereotyping as an instrument of social conflict. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4, 275-290.
26. Rutland, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Stereotypes as justifications for prior intergroup discrimination: Studies of Scottish national stereotyping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 127-141.
27. Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
28. Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Doosje, B. (2002). The (Il)legitimacy of ingroup bias: From social reality to social resistance. In Jost, & Major (Eds.), The psychology of Legitimacy. Cambridge: CUP.
29. Stott, C. J., & Drury, J. (2000). Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the 'poll tax riot'. Human Relations, 53, 247-273.
30. Stott, C. J., & Reicher, S. D. (1998). Crowd action as inter-group process: Introducing the police perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 509-529.
31. Stott, C. J., Hutchison, P., & Drury, J. (2001). 'Hooligans' abroad? Inter-group dynamics, social identity and participation in collective 'disorder' at the 1998 World Cup Finals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 359-384.
32. Tajfel, H. (1981). Social stereotypes and social groups. In J. C. Turner, & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 144-167). Oxford: Blackwell.
33. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237-252.
34. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
35. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
36. Wright, S. C. (1997). Ambiguity, social influence, and collective action: Generating collective protest in response to tokenism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1277-1290.
37. Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1998). Responding to tokenism: Individual action in the face of collective injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 647-667.
38. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.