Guidelines for non-discriminatory language use

The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 565-582

  Hellinger, Marlis ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949778814     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446200957.n37     Document Type: Chapter

References (108)

1. Alderson, C. and Banerjee, J.’Language testing and assessment (Part II)’, Language Teaching, 35:79-113. (2002)
2. Alderson, J. C.(2007) ’The challenge of (diagnostic) testing: do we know what we are measuring?’, in J.Fox, M.Wesche, D.Bayliss, et al. (eds), Language testing reconsidered. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. pp. 21-39.
3. Assessment Reform Group (2002) ’Assessment for learning: 10 principles’, Retrieved 24 November 2006, from http://www.assessment-reform-group.org.uk/CIE3.pdf.
4. Austin, J. L.(1962) How to do things with words. London: Clarendon Press.
5. Bachman, L.(1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bachman, L. F.(2007) ’What is the construct? The dialectic of abilities and contexts in defining constructs in language assessment’, in J.Fox, M.Wesche, D.Bayliss, et al. (eds), Language testing reconsidered. Ottawa: Ottawa University Press. pp. 41-71.
7. Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S.(1996) Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Bell, R. T.(1981) An introduction to applied linguistics: approaches and methods in language teaching. London: Batsford Academic and Educational Ltd.
9. Berns, M.(1990) Contexts of competence: social and cultural considerations in communicative language teaching. New York: Plenum Press.
10. Black, P. and Wiliam, D.(2006) Assessment for learning in the classroom. In J.Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 9-25). London: Sagedoi:10.4135/9781446250808 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.
11. Black, P. and Wiliam, D.’Assessment and classroom learning’, Assessment in Education, 5 (1):7-73. (1998a)
12. Black, P. and Wiliam, D.(1998b) Inside the black box. London: King’s College London.
13. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. and Wiliam, D.(2003) Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
14. Block, D.(2003) The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
15. Brindley, G.(1989) ’The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design’, in R. K.Johnson (ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 63-78.
16. Broadfoot, P. and Black, P.’Redefining assessment? The first ten years of Assessment in Education’, Assessment in Education, 11 (1):7-27. (2004)
17. Brown, H. D.(2000) Principles of language learning and teaching. 4th edn.White Plains, NY: Pearson Education (Longman).
18. Brown, H. G.(2001) Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. 2nd edn. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
19. Byram, M.(1997) Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
20. Byram, M., Nichols, D. A. and Stevens, D.(2001) Developing intercultural competence in practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
21. Campbell, R. and Wales, R.(1970) ’The study of language acquisition’, In J.Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguisitcs (pp. 242-260). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.
22. Canale, M.(1983) ’From communicative competence to language pedagogy’, in J.Richards andJ.Schmidt (eds), Language and communication. London: Longman. pp. 2-27.
23. Canale, M.(1984) ’A communicative approach to language proficiency assessment in a minority setting’, in C.Rivera (ed.), Communicative competence approaches to language proficiency assessment: research and application. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. pp. 107-22.
24. Canale, M. and Swain, M.’Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing’, Applied Linguistics, 1 (1):1-47. (1980a)
25. Canale, M. and Swain, M.(1980b) A domain description for core FSL: communication skills. Ontario: Ministry of Education.
26. Carter, R. (ed.) (1990) Knowledge about language and the curriculum: the LINC Reader. London: Hodder.
27. Carter, R.(1996) ’Politics and knowledge about language: the LINC Project’, in R.Hasan andG.Williams (eds), Literacy and society. London: Longman. pp. 1-21.
28. Carter, R.(1997). Investigating English discourse: language, literacy and literature. London: Routledge. Chapter 3.
29. Cazden, B., John, V. P. andHymes, D. (eds) (1972) Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
30. Chalhoub-Deville, M.’Theoretical models, assessment frameworks and test construction’, Lanugage Testing, 14 (1):3-22. (1997)
31. Chomsky, N.(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Cicourel, A. V. and Boese, R. J.(1972) ’Sign language acquisition and the teaching of the deaf’, in B.Cazden, V. P.John andD.Hymes (eds), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press. pp. 32-62.
33. Coffin, C.(1997) ’Constructing and giving value to the past’, in F.Christie andJ.Martin (eds), Genres and institutions: social processes in the workplace and the school. London: Continuum. pp. 196-230.
34. Coghill, G. and Wood, P.(1989). Spectrum Science 3. Melbourne: Heinemann.
35. Cope, W. and Kalantzis, M.(1993) The powers of literacy: a genre approach to teaching writing. London: Falmer Press.
36. Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Davidson, F. and Lynch, B. K.(2002) Testcraft: a teacher’s guide to writing and using language test specifications. New Haven, ET: Yale University Press.
38. Davis, A.(2008) Assessing Academic English: testing English proficiency 1950-1989 - the IELTS solution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Dubin, F.’Situating literacy within traditions of communicative competence’, Applied Linguistics, 10 (2):171-81. (1989)
40. Edmondson, W.(2001) ’Conversational analysis and language teaching’, in K.Brinker, A.Gerd, H.Wolfgang andS. F.Sager (eds), Text - und Gesprächslinguistik/Linguistics of Text and Conversation. Berlin: de Gruyter.
41. Eggins, S. and Slade, D.(1997) Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
42. Extra, G.(2006) ’Dealing with multilingualism in multicultural Europe: immigrant and minority languages at home and school’, in C.Leung andJ.Jenkins (eds), Reconfiguring Europe: the contribution of applied linguistics. London: Equinox. In association with the British Association for Applied Linguistics. pp. 21-40.
43. Fishman, J. A. and Lueders-Salmon, E.(1972) ’What has sociology of language to say to the teacher? On teaching the standard variety to speakers of dialectal or sociolectal varieties’, in B.Cazden, V. P.John andD.Hymes (eds), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press. pp. 67-83.
44. Fulcher, G. and Davidson, F.(2007) Language testing and assessment: an advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
45. Gilmore, A.’Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning’, Language Teaching, 40:97-118. (2007)
46. Gumperz, J. J. and Hernández-Chavez(1972) ’Bilingualism, bidialectalism, and classroom interaction’, in C. B.Cazden, V. P.John andD.Hymes (eds), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press. pp. 84-108.
47. Habermas, J.’Towards a theory of communicative competence’, Inquiry, 13360-375. (1970)
48. Hall, J. K., Cheng, A. and Carlson, M. T.’Reconceptualizing multicompetence as a theory of lanugage knowledge’, Applied Linguistics, 27 (2):220-40. (2006)
49. Halliday, M.(1994). An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
50. Halliday, M. A. K.(1973) Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
51. Halliday, M. A. K.(1975) Learning how to mean: explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.
52. Halliday, M. A. K.(2004) An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd edn. Revised by C. M. I. M.Matthiessen.London: Arnold.
53. Halliday, M. A.K. and Hasan, R.(1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
54. Halliday, M. A.K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.(2000). Construing experience through meaning: a language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.
55. Halliday, M. A. K. and (revised by) Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.(2004) An introduction to functional grammar(3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
56. Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A. and Strevens, P.(1964) The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
57. Harley, B., Allen, P., Cummins, J. and Swain, M.(1990) The development of second language proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Hornberger, N.’Tramites and transportes: the acquisition of second language communicative competence for one speech event in Puno, Peru’, Applied Linguistics, 10 (2):214-30. (1989)
59. Howatt, A. P. R. withWiddowson, H. G.(2004) A history of English language teaching. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Hymes, D.(1972) ’On communicative competence’, in J. B.Pride andJ.Holmes (eds), Sociolinguistics. London: Penguin.
61. Hymes, D.(1977) Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. London: Tavistock Publications.
62. Ivanic, R.(1997) Writing and identity: the discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
63. Jenkins, J.’Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca’, TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1):157-81. (2006)
64. Jenkins, J.(2007) English as a lingua franca: attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. John, V. P.(1972) ’Styles of learning - styles of of teaching: reflections on the education of Najavo children’, in C. B.Cazden, V. P.John andD.Hymes (eds), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press. pp. 331-43.
66. Kaplan, R. B. and Baldauf Jr, R. B.(1997) Language planning: from practice to theory. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
67. Kramsch, C.’Post 9/11: foreign languages between knowledge and power’, Applied Linguistics, 26 (4):545-67. (2005)
68. Kramsch, C.’From communicative competence to symbolic competence’, The Modern Language Journal, 90 (2):249-52. (2006)
69. Labov, W.(2008) ’Unendangered dialects, endangered people’, in K.King, N.Schilling-Estes, L.WrightFogle, J. J. Lou andB.Soukup (eds), Sustaining linguistic diversity: endangered and minority languages and language varieties (Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. pp. 219-328.
70. Language in the National Curriculum(1989-92)LINC material available on CD ROM or DVDhttp://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/ec/linc.htm : LINC Project.
71. Lea, M. and Street, B.’Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach’, Studies in Higher Education, 23 (2):157-72. (1998)
72. Lee, Y.-A.’Towards respecification of communicative competence: condition of L2 instruction or its objective’, Applied Linguistics, 27 (3):349-76. (2006)
73. Leung, C.’Convivial communication: recontextualizing communicative competence’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15 (2):119-44. (2005)
74. Leung, C.(2008) ’Second language academic literacies: converging understandings’, in B.Street andN. H.Hornberger (eds), Encyclopedia of language and education. Vol. 2. New York: Springer. pp. 143-61.
75. Leung, C. and Lewkowicz, J.(2008) ’Assessing second/additional language of diverse populations’, in E.Shohamy andN. H.Hornberger (eds), Encyclopedia of language and education. Vol. 7. New York: Springer. pp. 301-17.
76. Leung, C. and Mohan, B.’Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts - assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse’, Language Testing, 20 (3):335-59. (2004)
77. Lillis, T. M.(1999) ’Whose common sense? Essayist literacy and the institutional practice of mystery’, in C.Jones, J.Turner andB.Street (eds), Student writing in university: cultural and epistemological issues. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 127-47.
78. Lillis, T. M.(2001) Student writing: access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.
79. Lillis, T. M. and Scott, M.’Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy’, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4 (1):5-32. (2007)
80. Lin, A. M. Y.’Doing-English-Lessons in the reproduction or transformation of social worlds?’, TESOL Quarterly, 33 (3):393-412. (1999)
81. Lin, A. M. Y.(2001) ’Symbolic domination and bilingual classroom practices in Hong Kong’, in M.Heller andM.Martin-Jones (eds), Voices of authority: education and linguistic difference. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing. pp. 139-68.
82. Linguistic Minority Project (1985) The other languages of England. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
83. McKay, P.(2006) Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. McNamara, T. F.(1996) Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.
85. McNamara, T. and Roever, C.(2006) Language testing: the social dimension. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
86. Martin-Jones, M. and Saxena, M.(2001) ’Turn-taking and the positioning of bilingual participants in classroom discourse: insights from primary schools in England’, in M.Heller andM.Martin-Jones (eds), Voices of authority: education and linguistic difference. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing. pp. 117-38.
87. Ndayipfukamiye, L.(2001) ’The contradictions of teaching bilingually in postcolonial Burundi: from Nyakatsi to Maisons en Étages’, in M.Heller andM.Martin-Jones (eds), Voices of authority: education and linguistic difference. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing. pp. 101-16.
88. North, B.(1993) The development of descriptors on scales of language proficiency. Washington, DC: National Foreign Language Center.
89. Ohannessian, S. and Ansre, G.(1979) ’Some reflections on the educational use of sociolinguistc surveys’, in J. B.Pride(ed.), Sociolinguistic aspects of language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 57-70.
90. Philips, S. U.(1972) ’Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom’, in C. B.Cazden, V. P.John andD.Hymes (eds), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press. pp. 370-94.
91. Preston, D. R.(1989). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
92. Pride, J. B. (ed.) (1979) Sociolinguistic aspects of language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
93. QCA; Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (2007) The National Curriculum. London: QCA.
94. Rampton, B.(2006) Language in late modernity: interaction in an urban school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486722
95. Rea-Dickins, P. and Gardner, S.’Snares and silver bullets: disentangling the construct of formative assessment’, Language Testing, 17 (2):215-43. (2000)
96. Sauvignon, S. J.(1972) Communicative competence: an experiment in foreign language teaching. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.
97. Schleppegrell, M. J., Achugar, M. and Orteíza, T.’The grammar of history: enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language’, TESOL Quarterly, 38 (1):67-93. (2004)
98. Spolsky, B.(1989) Conditions for second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
99. Street, B.’What’s "new" in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice’, Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5 (2):1-14. (2003)
100. Street, B. V.(2005) ’Introduction: New Literacy Studies and literacies across educational contexts’, in B. V.Street (ed.), Literacies across educational contexts: mediating learning and teaching. Philadelphia: Caslon Pubishing. pp. 1-21.
101. Swann, M.(2002) ’Seven bad reasons for teaching grammar - and two good ones’, in J. C.Richards andW. A.Renandya (eds), Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 148-52.
102. van Lier, L.(1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
103. Veel, R.(1997) ’Learning how to mean - scientifically speaking: apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school’, in F.Christie andJ.Martin (eds), Genre and institutions: social processes in the workplace and school. London: Continuum. pp. 161-95.
104. Weir, C. J.(1990) Communicative language testing. London: Prentice Hall.
105. Whitely, W.(1979) ’Sociolinguistic survey at the national level’, in J. B.Pride(ed.), Sociolinguistic aspects of language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 44-56.
106. Widdowson, H.(1978) Learning language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
107. Widdowson, H. G.(2001) ’Communicative language testing: the art of the possible’, in C.Elder, N.Brown, E.Iwashita, et al. (eds), Experimenting with uncertainty: essays in honour of Alan Davies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 12-21.
108. Yalden, J.(1983). The communicative syllabus: evolution, design and implementation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.