Modelling the links between irrigation, ecosystem services and rural development in pursuit of social legitimacy: Results from a territorial analysis of the Neste System (Hautes-Pyrénées, France)

Journal of Rural Studies

Volumn 43, Issue , 2016, Pages 1-12

  Ricart, Sandra ^a   Clarimont, Sylvie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GIRONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE PAU ET DES PAYS DE L'ADOUR   (France)

Author keywords

Civil society; Competing water uses; Governance; Irrigation; Neste system; Territorial irrigation management approach

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SOCIETY; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; IRRIGATION SYSTEM; RESOURCE SCARCITY; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT;

FRANCE; HAUTES ALPES; PROVENCE-ALPES-COTE D'AZUR; PYRENEES;

EID: 84949681990     PISSN: 07430167     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allan J.A. Water in the environment/socio-economic development discourse: sustainability, changing management paradigms and policy responses in a global system. Gov. Oppos. 2005, 40(2):181-199.
2. Ananda J., Herath G. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 45:75-90.
3. Antunes P., Karadzic V., Santos R., Beça P., Osann A. Participatory multi-criteria analysis of irrigation management alternatives: the case of the Caia irrigation district, Portugal. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2011, 9(2):334-349.
4. Baker J.M., Everett Y., Liegel L., van Kirk R. Patterns of irrigated agricultural land conversion in a Western U.S. watershed: implications for landscape-level water management and land-use planning. Soc. Nat. Resour. A Int. J. 2014, 27(11):1145-1160.
5. Bidwell R.D., Ryan C.M. Collaborative partnership design: the implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2006, 19(9):827-843.
6. Billgren C., Holmen H. Approaching reality: comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:550-562.
7. Bjornlund H., Xu W., Wheeler S. An overview of water sharing and participation issues for irrigators and their communities in Albert: implications for water policy. Agric. Water Manag. 2014, 145:171-180.
8. Bodin Ö., Crona B.I. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference?. Glob. Environ. Change 2009, 19:366-374.
9. Boelens R., Vos J. The danger of naturalizing water policy concepts: water productivity and efficiency discourses from field irrigation to virtual water trade. Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 108:16-26.
10. Bohnet I.C. Lessons learned from public participation in water quality improvement planning: a study from Australia. Soc. Nat. Resour. Int. J. 2014, 10.1080/08941920.2014.941446.
11. Borisova T., Racevskis L., Kipp J. Stakeholder analysis of a collaborative watershed management process: a Florida case study. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2012, 48(2):277-296.
12. Broderick K. Communities in catchments: implications for natural resource management. Geogr. Res. 2005, 43:286-296.
13. Bryson J.M. What to do when stakeholders matter. Stakehold. Identif. Analysis Tech. Public Manag. Rev. 2004, 6(1):21-53.
14. Carlsson L., Sandström A. Network governance of the commons. Int. J. Commons 2008, 2(1):33-54.
15. Carr G., Potter R.B., Nortcliff S. Water reuse for irrigation in Jordan: perceptions of water quality among farmers. Agric. Water Manag. 2011, 98:847-854.
16. Carr D., Halvorsen K. An evaluation of three democratic, community-based approaches to citizen participation: surveys, conversations with community groups, and community dinners. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2001, 14(2):107-126.
17. Collins D., Kearns R.A., Le Heron R.B. Water pressure: irrigation, governance and land use intensification in Maungatapere, New Zealand. J. Rural Stud. 2001, 17:29-39.
18. Cuéllar-Padilla M., Calle-Collado A. Can we find solutions with people? Participatory action research with small organic producers in Andalusia. J. Rural Stud. 2011, 27(4):372-383.
19. De Marchi B., Funtowicz S., Cascio S.L., Munda G. Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 34:267-282.
20. Dewulf A., Craps M., Bouwen R., Taillieu T., Pahl-Wostl C. Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water, Sci. Technol. 2005, 52:115-124.
21. Diani M. Networks and social movements: a research programme. Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford. M. Diani, D. McAdam (Eds.).
22. Elden S. Land, terrain, territory. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2010, 34:799-817.
23. Falloon P., Betts R. Climate impacts on European agriculture and water management in the context of adaptation and mitigation - the importance of an integrated approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408:5667-5687.
24. Fernald A.G., Baker T.T., Guldan S.J. Hydrologic, riparian and agroecosystem functions of traditional acequia ecosystems. J. Sustain. Agric. 2007, 30:147-171.
25. Folke C., Hahn T., Olsson P., Norberg J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2005, 30:441-473.
26. Frooman J. Stakeholder influence strategies. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1999, 24(2):191-205.
27. Gallego-Ayala J., Juízo D. Integrating stakeholders' preferences into water resources management planning in the Incomati River Basin. Water Resour. Manag. 2014, 28:527-540.
28. Ghiotti S. Les territoires de l'eau. Gestion et développement en France 2007, 246. CNRS Editions, Paris.
29. Giordano M., Shah T. From IWRM back to integrated water resources management. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 2014, 30(3):364-376.
30. Gleick P. The changing water paradigm. A look at twenty-first century water resources development. Water Int. 2000, 25:127-138.
31. Grimble R., Wellard K. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agric. Syst. 1997, 55(2):173-193.
32. Häkli J. In the territory of knowledge: state-centred discourses and the construction of society. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 2001, 25:403-422.
33. Hanaki N., Peterhansl A., Dodds P.S., Watts D.J. Cooperation in evolving social networks. Manag. Sci. 2007, 53:1036-1050.
34. Harrison S.R., Qureshi M.E. Choice of stakeholder groups in multicriteria decision models. Nat. Resour. Forum 2000, 24:1-19.
35. Holmes J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia: gaps in the research agenda. J. Rural Stud. 2006, 22(2):142-160.
36. Hophmayer-Tokich S., Krozer Y. Public participation in rural area water management: experiences from the North Sea countries in Europe. Water Int. 2008, 33:243-257.
37. Jeffrey P., Gearey M. Integrated water resources management: lost on the road from ambition to realisation?. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53(1):1-8.
38. Jonas K., Glenna L.L., Weltzien E. Assessing participatory processes and outcomes in agricultural research for development from participants' perspectives. J. Rural Stud. 2014, 35:91-100.
39. Knox J.W., Kay M.G., Weatherhead E.K. Water regulation, crop production, and agricultural water management-Understanding farmer perspectives on irrigation efficiency. Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 108:3-8.
40. Laplume A., Sonpar O.K., Litz R.A. Stakeholder Theory: reviewing a theory that moves us. J. Manag. 2008, 34(6):1152-1189.
41. Lawrence A. No personal motive? Volunteers, biodiversity, and the false dichotomies of participation. Ethics, Place Environ. 2006, 9:279-298.
42. Levin S.A. Learning to live in a global commons: socioeconomic challenges for a sustainable environment. Ecol. Res. 2006, 21:328-333.
43. Lienert J., Schnetzer F., Ingold K. Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 125:134-148.
44. Luyet V., Schlaepfer R., Parlange M.B., Buttler A. A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 111:213-219.
45. Margerum R.D. Overcoming locally based collaboration constraints. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2007, 20:135-152.
46. Marshall G.R. From words to deeds: enforcing farmers'conservation cost-sharing commitments. J. Rural Stud. 2004, 20:157-167.
47. Martins G., Brito A.G., Nogueira R., Ureña M., Fernández D., Luque F.J., Alcácer C. Water resources management in southern Europe: clues for a research and innovation based regional hypercluster. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 119:76-84.
48. McGuire M., Morton L.W., Arbuckle J.G., Cast A.D. Farmer identities and responses to the social-biophysical environment. J. Rural Stud. 2015, 39:145-155.
49. Morgan S.Ll, Marsden T., Miele M., Morley A. Agricultural multifunctionality and farmers' entrepreneurial skills: a study of Tuscan and Welsh farmers. J. Rural Stud. 2010, 26:116-129.
50. Morrison T.H. Developing a regional governance index: the institutional potential of rural regions. J. Rural Stud. 2014, 35:101-111.
51. Olsson P., Folke C., Berkes F. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social and ecological systems. Environ. Manag. 2004, 34:75-90.
52. Özerol G., Bressers H., Coenen F. Irrigated agriculture and environmental sustainability: an alignment perspective. Environ. Sci. Policy 2012, 23:57-67.
53. Pahl-Wostl C., Craps M., Dewulf A., Mostert E., Tàbara D., Taillieu T. Social learning and water resources management. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12(2):5. [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss2/art5/.
54. Pahl-Wostl C., Tàbara D., Bouwen R., Craps M., Dewulf M., Mostert E., Ridder D., Taillieu T. The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64:484-495.
55. Pecqueur B. Vers une géographie économique et culturelle autour de la notion de territoire. Revue Géogr. Cult. 2004, 49:71-86.
56. Petit O. La surexploitation des eaux souterraines: enjeux et gouvernance. Natures Sci. Sociétés 2004, 12(2):146-156.
57. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:2417-2431.
58. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:1933-1949.
59. Ricart S., Clarimont S. De la gouvernance appliquée à la gestion de l'irrigation: le cas du canal de la Neste (Hautes-Pyrénées). Sud-Ouest Eur. 2013, 35:69-84.
60. Rootes C. Acting locally: the character, contexts and significance of local environmental mobilisations. Environ. Polit. 2007, 16(5):722-741.
61. Ruf T. Le système irrigué comme territoire. Territ. Mutat. 2004, 12:51-62.
62. Sánchez-Zamora P., Gallardo-Cobos R., Ceña-Delgado F. Rural areas face the economic crisis: analyzing the determinants of successful territorial dynamics. J. Rural Stud. 2014, 35:11-25.
63. Sinclair A.J., Kumnerdpet W., Moyer J.M. Learning sustainable water practices through participatory irrigation management in Thailand. Nat. Resour. Forum 2013, 37:55-66.
64. Tippett J., Searle B., Pahl-Wostl C., Rees Y. Social learning in public participation in river basin management-Early findings from HarmoniCOP European case studies. Environ. Sci. Policy 2005, 8:287-299.
65. Turral H., Svendsen M., Faures J.M. Investing in irrigation: reviewing the past and looking to the future. Agric. Water Manag. 2010, 97:551-560.
66. Villocel A., Boubée D., Lagardelle G., Chisne P. Soutien des étiages dans le Sud-ouest de la France. Outils de gestion équilibrée de la ressource en eau. La Houille Blanche 2010, 5:23-29.
67. Wiener J.D., Dwire K.A., Skagen S.K., Crifasi R.R., Yates D. Riparian ecosystem consequences of water redistribution along the Colorado front Range. Water Resour. Impact 2008, 10(3):18-21.
68. Young O., Berkhout F., Gallopin G.C., Jansseri M.A., Ostrom E., van der Leeuw S. The globalization of socio-ecological systems: an agenda for scientific research. Glob. Environ. Change 2006, 16(3):304-316.