Exploring strategic venture capital financing with Silicon Valley style

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 102, Issue , 2016, Pages 80-89

  Wonglimpiyarat, Jarunee ^a  

^a THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

High tech clusters; R D commercialization; Triple Helix; Venture capital; Yozma

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; FINANCE; LANDFORMS; SILICON;

FINANCIAL SUPPORT; HIGH TECH CLUSTERS; INSTITUTIONAL SETTING; PRIVATE INVESTMENT; TRIPLE HELIXES; VENTURE CAPITAL; VENTURE CAPITAL FINANCINGS; YOZMA;

INVESTMENTS;

CAPITAL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMMERCIALIZATION; FINANCE; HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

ISRAEL;

EID: 84949539279     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.007     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Archibugi D., Michie J. Technological globalisation or national systems of innovation. Futures 1997, 29(2):121-137.
2. Arranz N., de Arroyabe C.F. Can innovation network projects result in efficient performance?. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79(3):485-497.
3. Ashcroft B., Dunlop S., Love J.H. UK innovation policy; a critique. Reg. Stud. 1995, 21:241-254.
4. Avnimelech G. VC Policy: Yozma Program 15-Years Perspective. Paper to be Presented at the Summer Conference, 17-19 June 2009 2009, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.
5. Avnimelech G., Teubal M. Venture capital - start-up co-evolution and the emergence and development of Israel's new high tech cluster. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2004, 13(1):33-60.
6. Avnimelech G., Teubal M. Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience. Res. Policy 2006, 35(10):1477-1498.
7. Beckeman M., Skjöldebrand C. Clusters/networks promote food innovation. J. Food Eng. 2007, 79(4):1418-1425.
8. Bertoni F., Colombo M.G., Grilli L. Venture capital financing and the growth of high-tech start-ups: disentangling treatment from selection effects. Res. Policy 2011, 40(7):1028-1043.
9. Borrás S., Edquist C. The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80(8):1513-1522.
10. Bygrave W.D., Timmons J.A. Venture Capital at the Crossroads 1992, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, M.A.
11. Bygrave W., Hay M., Peeters J. The Venture Capital Handbook 1999, Financial Times-Prentice Hall, London.
12. Conceição O., Fontes M., Calapez T. The commercialisation decisions of research-based spin-off: targeting the market for technologies. Technovation 2012, 32(1):43-56.
13. Davila A., Foster G., Gupta M. Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. J. Bus. Ventur. 2003, 18(6):689-708.
14. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14(4):532-550.
15. Etzkowitz H. Incubation of Incubators: Innovation as a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Networks Science and Public Policy 2002, (April).
16. Etzkowitz H. The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. Int. J. Technol. Glob. 2004, 1(1):64-77.
17. Etzkowitz H. Creative reconstruction: from isolated innovation mechanisms to a Triple Helix regime. Int. J. Technoentrepreneurship 2011, 2(3-4):210-226.
18. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations 1998, Industry and Higher Education, (August).
19. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government Relations. Res. Policy 2000, 29:109-123.
20. European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association Survey of Private Equity and Venture Capital in Europe 2005 2005, (Brussels, Belgium).
21. Feldman M. Location and innovation: the new economic geography of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration. Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford. G.L. Clark, M. Feldman, M. Gertler (Eds.).
22. Freeman C. National Systems of Innovation: the Case of Japan Technology Policy and Economics Performance: Lessons From Japan 1987, Pinter Publishers, London.
23. Gay B., Dousset B. Innovation and network structural dynamics: study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry. Res. Policy 2005, 34:1457-1475.
24. Gnyawali D.R., Srivastava M.K. Complementary effects of clusters and networks on firm innovation: a conceptual model. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2013, 30(1):1-20.
25. Gompers P.A., Lerner J. The Money of Invention 2001, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, M.A.
26. Grilli L., Murtinu S. Government, venture capital and the growth of European high-tech entrepreneurial firms. Res. Policy 2014, 43(9):1523-1543.
27. Hellmann T., Puri M. The interaction between product market and financing strategy: the role of venture capital. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2000, 13:959-984. (Winter).
28. Ivanova I.A., Leydesdorf L. Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 86:143-156.
29. Leydesdorff L., Zawdie G. The Triple Helix perspective of innovation systems. Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag. 2010, 22(7):789-804.
30. Lundvall B. Why study national systems and national styles of innovation?. Tech. Anal. Strat. Manag. 1998, 10(4):407-422.
31. McEvily S.K., Eisenhardt K.M., Prescott J.E. The global acquisition, leverage, and protection of technological competencies. Strateg. Manag. J. 2004, 25:713-722.
32. Megginson W. Towards a Global Model of Venture Capital http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/M/William.L.Megginson-1/vcglobpjacf.pdf.
33. Novelli E., Rao R. Complementary assets and market for technology: an empirical study of innovative SMEs. Proceedings of the DRUID-DIME Winter Conference 2007, January 25-27, Aalborg 2007.
34. Porter M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations 1990, Macmillan, London.
35. Porter M. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1998, 89(1):101-107.
36. Porter M. San Diego, Clusters of Innovation Initiative, Council on Competitiveness 2001, Monitor Group on the Frontier, Washington D.C.
37. Saxenian A.L. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 1994, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.A.
38. Schumpeter J. The Theory of Economic Development 1934, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.A.
39. Schumpeter J.A. Business cycles: a Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process 1939, vol. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York.
40. Senor D., Singer S. Start-Up Nation: the Story of Israel's Economic Miracle 2009, Hachette Book Group, New York.
41. Steiner M. The discreet charm of clusters: an introduction. Clusters and Regional Specialisation 1998, Pion, London. M. Steiner (Ed.).
42. Teece D.J. Profiting from technological innovation. The Competitive Challenge 1986, Harper and Row, New York. D.J. Teece (Ed.).
43. Teubal M. The innovation system of Israel: description performance and outstanding issues. National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis 1993, Oxford University Press, Oxford. R.R. Nelson (Ed.).
44. Trajtenberg M. Innovation in Israel 1968-1997: a comparative analysis using patent data. Res. Policy 2001, 30(3):363-389.
45. Trajtenberg M. Government support for commercial R&D: lessons from the Israeli experience. Innovation Policy and the Economy 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, M.A. A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, S. Stern (Eds.).
46. Wonglimpiyarat J. What are the mechanisms driving the success of US Silicon Valley?. Int. J. Technol. Policy Manage. 2005, 5(2):200-213.
47. Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2003, Sage, Beverly Hills.