The triple helix perspective of innovation systems

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 789-804

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a   Zawdie, Girma ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evolutionary theory; Innovation systems; Knowledge base; Regimes; Selection environments; Technological trajectories; Triple helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957057465     PISSN: 09537325     EISSN: 14653990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2010.511142     Document Type: Editorial

References (64)

1. Abramowitz, M., and P.A. David.1996.Measuringperformanceofknowledge-basedeconomy. In Employmentandgrowth in the knowledge-based economy, 35-60. Paris: OECD.
2. Andersen, E.S. 1994. Evolutionary economics: Post-Schumpeterian contributions. London: Pinter.
3. Aoki, M. 2001. Towards a comparative institutional analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bowker, G.C. 2005. Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Braczyk, H.-J., P. Cooke, and M. Heidenreich, (eds). 1998. Regional innovation systems. London/Bristol PA: University College London Press.
6. Bruckner, E., W. Ebeling, M.A.J. Montaño, and A. Scharnhorst. 1994. Hyperselection and innovation described by a stochastic model of technological evolution. In Evolutionary economics and chaos theory: New directions in technology studies, ed. L. Leydesdorff and P. v.d. Besselaar, 79-90. London: Pinter.
7. Carlsson, B., and R. Stankiewicz. 1991. On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1, no. 2: 93-118.
8. Casson, M. 1997. Information and organization: A new perspective on the theory of the firm. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
9. Collins, H.M. 1974. The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies 4, no. 2: 165-85.
10. Cooke, P. 2002. Knowledge economies. London: Routledge.
11. Dasgupta, P., and P. David. 1994. Towards a new economics of science. Research Policy 23, no. 5: 487-522.
12. David, P., and D. Foray. 1995. Assessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. STI Review 16: 13-68.
13. David, P., and D. Foray. 2002. An introduction to the economy of the knowledge society. International Social Science Journal 54, no. 171: 9-23.
14. De Rosa Pires, A., and E.A. de Castro. 1997. Can a strategic project for a university be strategic to regional development? Science and Public Policy 24, no. 1: 15-20.
15. Dolfsma, W., and L. Leydesdorff. 2009. Lock-in and break-out from technological trajectories: Modeling and policy implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76, no. 7: 932-941.
16. Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1995. The Triple Helix - university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. European Association for the Study of Science and Technology Review 14: 14-19.
17. Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29, no. 2: 109-123.
18. Etzkowitz, H., A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, and B.R.C. Terra. 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy 29, no. 2: 313-30.
19. Florida, R. 2002. Bohemia and economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 2, no. 1: 55-71.
20. Foray, D. 2004. The economics of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Freeman, C. 1982. The economics of industrial innovation. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
22. Freeman, C. 1987. Technology, policy, and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
23. Freeman, C., and C. Perez. 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical change and economic theory, ed. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete, 38-66. London: Pinter.
24. Frenken, K. 2005. Innovation, evolution and complexity theory. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
25. Frenken, K. and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. Scaling trajectories in civil aircraft (1913-1970). Research Policy 29, no. 3: 331-348.
26. Godin, B. and Y. Gingras. 2000. The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy 29, no. 2: 273-278.
27. Gunasekara, C. 2006. Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. The Journal of Technology Transfer 31, no. 1: 101-113.
28. Habermas, J. 1987. Excursus on Luhmann's appropriation of the philosophy of the subject through systems theory. In The philosophical discourse of modernity: Twelve lectures, 368-385. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Krugman, P. 1996. The self-organizing economy. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Langford, C.H., R.D. Burch, and M.W. Langford. 1997. The 'well-stirred reactor': Evolution of industry-government- university relations in Canada. Science and Public Policy 24, no. 1: 21-27.
31. Larédo, P. 2003. Six major challenges facing public intervention in higher education, science, technology and innovation. Science and Public Policy 30, no. 1: 4-12.
32. Lengyel, B., and L. Leydesdorff. 2010. Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, doi: 10.10.1080/00343401003614274.
33. Leydesdorff, L. 2010. The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens' 'structuration theory'and Luhmann's 'self-organization'. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, doi: 10.1002/asi.21381.
34. Leydesdorff, L., W. Dolfsma, and G. van der Panne. 2006. Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of Triple-Helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory'. Research Policy 35, no. 2: 181-199.
35. Leydesdorff, L., and M. Fritsch. 2006. Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics. Research Policy 35, no. 10: 1538-1553.
36. Luhmann, N. [1984] 1995. Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37. Lundvall, B.-Å. 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In Technical change and economic theory, ed. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete, 349-69. London: Pinter.
38. Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed). 1992. National systems of innovation. London: Pinter.
39. Machlup, F. 1962. The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40. Malerba, F., R. Nelson, L. Orsenigo, and S. Winter. 1999. 'History-firendly' models of industry evolution: The computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change 8, no. 1: 3-35.
41. Moso, M., and M. Olazaran. 2002. Regional technology policy and the emergence of an R&D system in the Basque Country. Journal of Technology Transfer 27, no. 1: 61-75.
42. Nelson, R.R. 1994. Economic growth via the coevolution of technology and institutions. In Evolutionary economic and chaos theory: New directions in technology studies, ed. L. Leydesdorff and P. v.d. Besselaar, 21-32. London: Pinter.
43. Nelson, R.R. (ed.). 1982. Government and technical progress: A cross-industry analysis. NewYork: Pergamon Press.
44. Nelson, R.R. (ed.). 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
45. Nelson, R.R., and S.G.Winter. 1975. Growth theory from an evolutionary perspective:The differential productivity growth puzzle. American Economic Review 65, no. 2: 338-344.
46. Nelson, R.R., and S.G. Winter. 1977. In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy 6: 35-76.
47. Nelson, R.R., and S.G. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
48. OECD. 2009. OECD reviews of regional innovation: Piedmont, Italy. Paris: OECD.
49. Pavitt, K. 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a theory and a taxonomy. Research Policy 13, no. 6: 343-373.
50. Penrose, E.T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. NewYork: John Wiley.
51. Polanyi, M. 1961. Knowing and being. Mind 70, no. 280: 458-470.
52. Riba-Vilanova, M. and L. Leydesdorff. 2001. Why Catalonia cannot be considered as a regional innovation system. Scientometrics 50, no. 2: 215-240.
53. Sahal, D. 1981. Patterns of technological innovation. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
54. Sahal, D. 1985. Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Research Policy 14: 61-82.
55. Schumpeter, J. 1943. Socialism, capitalism and democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.
56. Schumpeter, J. [1939], 1964. Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
57. Skolnikoff, E.B. 1993. The elusive transformation: Science, technology and the evolution of international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58. Von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Whitley, R.D. 1984. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. A study in the economics of internal organization. NewYork: Free Press.
61. Windrum, P. 1999. Simulation models of technological innovation: A review. American Behavioral Scientist 42, no. 10: 1531-1550.
62. Yamauchi, I. 1986. Long range strategic planning in Japanese R&D. In Design, innovation and long cycles in economic development, ed. C. Freeman, 169-185. London: Pinter.
63. York, H.F. 1970. Race to oblivion: A participant's view of the Arms Race. New York: Simon and Schuster.http://www. learnworld.com/ZNW/LWText.York.Race.Access.html (accessed 31 January 2010).
64. Zuboff, S. 1988. In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. NewYork: Basic Books.