Quantification and monetary valuation of urban ecosystem services in Munich, Germany

Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsgeographie

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 188-200

  Aevermann, Tim ^a   Schmude, Jürgen ^a  

^a NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Germany; Green space; Monetization; Munich; Urban; Valuation

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GREENSPACE; LAND COVER; PLANNING PROCESS; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN PLANNING; VALUATION;

BAVARIA; GERMANY; MUNICH;

EID: 84949514107     PISSN: 00443751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ATKINSON, G./GUNDIMEDA, H. (2006): Accounting for India's forest wealth. In: Ecological Economics, (59) 4, 462-476.
2. BAUMGARDNER, D./VAREL A, S./ESCOBEDO, F. J./CHACALO A./OCHOA, C. (2012): The role of a peri-urban forest on air quality improvement in the Mexico City megalopolis. In: Environmental Pollution, 163, 174-183.
3. Bayerische Forstverwaltung (Hrsg.) (2012): Managementplan für das FFH-Gebiet Nymphenburger Park mit Allee und Kapuzinerhölzl (DE 7834-301). Ebersberg.
4. Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung (Hrsg.) (2012): GeodatenOnline Rasterdaten DOP20. München.
5. Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung (Hrsg.) (2013): GeodatenOnline Rasterdaten DTK50. München.
6. BENMAP (2014): Environmental benefits mapping and analysis Program. Internet: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/benmap/index.html, 1.8.2014.
7. BOISVERT, V./MERAL, P./FROGER, G. (2013): Market-based instruments for ecosystem services. Institutional innovation or renovation? In: Society & Natural Resources, (26) 10, 1122-1136.
8. BOLUND, P./HUNHAMMAR, S. (1999): Ecosystem services in urban areas. In: Ecological Economics, (29) 2, 293-301.
9. BOYD, J./BANZHAF, S. (2007): What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. In: Ecological Economics, (63) 2-3, 616-626.
10. Bundesministerium fiir Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (BMU) (Hrsg.) (2000): Hydrologischer Atlas von Deutschland. Berlin.
11. BURSCHEL, P. (1995): Forests, forestry and global ecology. In: Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, (114) 2, 80-96.
12. CHOI, W./GALASINSKI, U./CHO, S.-J./HWANG, C.-S. (2012): A spatiotemporal analysis of groundwater level changes in relation to urban growth and groundwater recharge potential for Waukesha County, Wisconsin. In: Geographical Analysis, (44) 3, 219-234.
13. COSTANZA, R./CMBERLAND, J. H./DALY, H. E./GODLAND, R. J./NORGAARD, R. B./ESER, T. W. (2001): Einführung in die ökologische Ökonomik. Stuttgart.
14. COSTANZA, R./DARGE, R./DE GROOT, R./FARBER, S./GRASSO, M./HANNON, B./LIMBURG, K./NAEEM, S./ONEILL, R. V./PARUELO, J./RASKIN, R. G./SUTTON, P./VAN DEN BELT, M. (1997): The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. In: Nature, (387) 6630, 253-260.
15. CUTTER, W. B. (2007): Valuing groundwater recharge in an urban context. In: Land Economics, (83) 2, 234-252.
16. DAILY, G. C. (Ed.) (1997): Nature's services. Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC.
17. DAVIES, Z. G./EDMONDSON, J. L./HEINEMEYER, A./LEAKE, J. R./GASTON, K. J. (2011): Mapping an urban ecosystem service: Quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. In: Journal of Applied Ecology, (48) 5, 1125-1134.
18. DIETER, M./ELSASSER, P. (2002): Carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in the tree biomass of Germany's forests. In: Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, (121) 4, 195-210.
19. DOBBS, C./ESCOBEDO, F. J./ZIPPERER, W. C. (2011): Aframework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, (99) 3-4, 196-206.
20. Energy Exchange Austria (EXAA) (2014): Historische Marktdaten EU Emission Allowances. Internet: http://www.exaa.at/de/marktdaten/historische-daten, 5.4.2014.
21. ERICKSON, T. O./STEFAN, H. G. (2009): Natural groundwater recharge response to urbanization: Vermillion River watershed, Minnesota. In: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, (135) 6, 512-520.
22. ESCOBEDO, F. J./NOWAK, D. J. (2009): Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, (90) 3-4, 102-110.
23. ESCOBEDO, F. J./WAGNER, J. E./NOWAK, D. J./DE LA MAZA, C. L./RODRIGUEZ, M./CRANE, D. E. (2008): Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile's policy of using urban forests to improve air quality. In: Journal of Environmental Management, (86) 1, 148-157.
24. FARLEY, J. (2012): Ecosystem services: The economics debate. In: Ecosystem Services, (1) 1, 40-49.
25. FISHER, B./TURNER, R. K./MORLING, P. (2009): Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. In: Ecological Economics, (68) 3, 643-653.
26. GÖBEL, P./COLDWEY, W. G./DIERKES, C./KORIES, H./MESSER, J./MEISSNER, E. (2007): Impacts of green roofs and rain water use on the water balance and groundwater levels in urban areas. In: Grundwasser, (12) 3, 189-200.
27. GÖMEZ-BAGGETHUN, E./KELEMEN, E./MARTIN-LÖPEZ, B./PALOMO, I./MONTES, C. (2013): Scale misfit in ecosystem service governance as a source of environmental conflict. In: Society & Natural Resources, (26) 1, 1202-1216.
28. DE GROOT, R./WILSON, M. A./BOUMANS, R. M. J. (2002): A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. In: Ecological Economics, (41) 3, 393-408.
29. GUNDIMEDA, H./SUKHDEV, P./SINHA, R. K./SANYAL, S. (2007): Natural resource accounting for Indian states. Illustrating the case of forest resources. In: Ecological Economics, (61) 4, 635-649.
30. HAASE, D. (2009): Effects of urbanisation on the water balance. A long-term trajectory. In: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, (29) 4, 211-219.
31. HAUCK, J./GÖRG, C/VARJOPURO, R./RARAMÄKI, O./JAX, K. (2013): Benefits and limitations of the ecosystem services concept in environmental policy and decision making: Some stakeholder perspectives. In: Environmental Science & Policy, 25, 13-21.
32. Hessischer Landlag (Hrsg.) (1992): Hessisches Grundwasserabgabengesetz (HGruwAG). Wiesbaden.
33. HIRABAYASHI, S./KROLL, C. N./NOWAK, D. J. (2011): Component-based development and sensitivity analyses of an air pollutant dry deposition model. In: Environmental Modelling and Software, (26) 6, 804-816.
34. HIRABAYASHI, S./KROLL, C. N./NOWAK, D. J. (2012): Development of a distributed air pollutant dry deposition modeling framework. In: Environmental Pollution, 171, 9-17.
35. JENKINS, W. A./MURRAY, B. C./KRAMER, R. A./FAULKNER, S. P. (2010): Valuing ecosystem services from wetlands restoration in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. In: Ecological Economics, (69) 5, 1051-1061.
36. JIM, C. Y./CHEN, W. Y. (2006): Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China). In: Environmental Management, (38) 3, 338-349.
37. JIM, C. Y./CHEN, W. Y. (2008): Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China). In: Journal of Environmental Management, (88) 4, 665-676.
38. JIM, C. Y./CHEN, W. Y. (2009): Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. In: Cities, (26) 4, 187-194.
39. KÜLLING, C./TOMSU, C. (2003): Grundwassermodell östliche Münchner Schotterebene. In: Umweltreport der Stadt München 2003. München, 59-66.
40. KOTTEK, M./GRIESER, J./BECK, C./RUDOLF, B./RUBEL, F. (2006): World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. In: Meteorologische Zeitschrift, (15) 3, 259-263.
41. Landeshauptstadt München (Hrsg.) (2005): Satzung über Abgaben beim Anschluss an städtische Kanäle und für die Benutzung der städtischen Entwässerungseinrichtung (Entwässerungsabgabensatzung, EAS). München.
42. Landeshauptstadt München (Hrsg.) (2010): Statistisches Jahrbuch 2010. München.
43. Landtag von Baden-Württemberg (Hrsg.) (2010): Gesetz zur Änderung der Vorschriften über das Wasserentnahmeentgelt. Stuttgart.
44. LERNER, D. N./HARRIS, B. (2009): The relationship between land use and groundwater resources and quality. In: Land Use Policy, 26, S265-S273.
45. LUCK, G. W./CHAN, K. M. A./ESER, U./GOMEZ-BAGGETHUN, E./MATZDORF, B./NORTON, B./POTSCHIN, M. B. (2012): Ethical considerations in on-ground applications of the ecosystem services concept. In: Bioscience, (62) 12, 1020-1029.
46. MATERO, J./SAASTAMOINEN, O. (2007): In search of marginal environmental valuations. Ecosystem services in Finnish forest accounting. In: Ecological Economics, (61) 1, 101-114.
47. MATYSSEK, R./WIESER, G./PATZNER, K./BLASCHKE, H./HÄBERLE, K. H. (2009): Transpiration of forest trees and stands at different altitude: Consistencies rather than contrasts? In: European Journal of Forest Research, (128) 6, 579-596.
48. MCPHERSON, E. G./SIMPSON, J. R./XIAO, Q./WU, C. (2011): Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, (99) 1, 40-50.
49. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (Ed.) (2005): Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC.
50. MILLWARD, A. A./SABIR, S. (2011): Benefits of a forested urban park: What is the value of Allan Gardens to the city of Toronto, Canada? In: Landscape and Urban Planning, (100) 3, 177-188.
51. MULLER, N. Z./MENDELSOHN, R. (2007): Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States. In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, (54) 1, 1-14.
52. Münchner Stadtentwässerung (Hrsg.) (2012): Geschäftsbericht 2011 Nachhaltigkeit. München.
53. MURADIAN, R. (2013): Payments for ecosystem services as incentives for collective action. In: Society & Natural Resources, (26) 10, 1155-1169.
54. NOWAK, D. J./CRANE, D. E. (2002): Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. In: Environmental Pollution, (116) 3, 381-389.
55. NOWAK, D. J./CRANE, D. E./STEVENS, J. C. (2006): Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. In: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, (4) 3-4, 115-123.
56. NOWAK, D. J./CRANE, D. E./STEVENS, J. C./HOEHN, R. E./WALTON, J. T./BOND, J. (2008): A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. In: Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, (34) 6, 347-358.
57. NOWAK, D. J./GREENFIELD, E. J. (2012): Tree and impervious cover change in US cities. In: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, (11) 1, 21-30.
58. 2.5 removal by trees in ten U. S. cities and associated health effects. In: Environmental Pollution, 178, 395-402.
59. PERMAN, R. (2003): Natural resource and environmental economics. Harlow.
60. RD/BURNETT, R. T./THURSTON, G. D./THUN, M. J./CALLE, E. E./KREWSKI, D./GODLESKI, J. J. (2004): Cardiovascular mortality and long-term exposure to particulate air pollution: Epidemiological evidence of general pathophysiological pathways of disease. In: Circulation, (109) 1, 71-77.
61. ROGALL, H. (2008): Ökologische Ökonomie. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden.
62. Sächsischer Landlag (Hrsg.) (2012): Sächsisches Wassergesetz (SächsWG). Dresden.
63. SCHRÖDER, W./SCHMIDT, G./PESCH, R. (2009): Großräumige Regionalisierung der Kohlenstoffbindung in Wäldern Nordrhein-Westfalens. In: Umweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung, (21) 6, 516-526.
64. SIEBERT, H. (2008): Economics of the environment. Theory and policy. Berlin.
65. SMITH, W. H. (1990): Air pollution and forests. Interactions between air contaminants and forest ecosystems. New York.
66. SOARES, A. L./REGO, F. C./MCPHERSON, E. G./SIMPSON, J. R./PEPER, P. J./XIAO, Q. (2011): Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal. In: Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, (10) 2, 69-78.
67. STROHBACH, M. W./HAASE, D. (2012): Above-ground carbon storage by urban trees in Leipzig, Germany. Analysis of patterns in a European city. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, (104) 1, 95-104.
68. TALLIS, M./TAYLOR, G./SINNETT, D./FREER-SMITH, P. (2011): Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, (103) 2, 129-138.
69. TEEB (Ed.) (2010): The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity. Ecological and Economic Foundations. London.
70. Umweltbundesamt (Hrsg.) (2013): Luftqualität 2012. Vor läufige Auswerfung. Dessau.
71. VANDERMEULEN, V./VERSPECHT, A./VERMEIRE, B./VAN HUYLENBROEK, G./GELLYNCK, X. (2011): The use of economic valuation to create public support for green infrastructure investments in urban areas. In: Landscape and Urban Planning, (103) 2, 198-206.
72. WAINGER, L./MAZZOTTA, M. (2011): Realizing the potential of ecosystem services. A framework for relating ecological changes to economic benefits. In: Environmental Management, (48) 4, 710-733.
73. WANG, X./CHEN, W./ZHANG, L./JIN, D./LU, C. (2010): Estimating the ecosystem service losses from proposed land reclamation projects: A case study in Xiamen. In: Ecological Economics, (69) 12, 2549-2556.
74. World Bank (2014): PPP conversion factor, GDP (LCU per international $). Internet: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/PA. NUS. PPP, 1.8.2014.
75. ZHANG, B./XIE, G./ZHANG, C./ZHANG, J. (2012): The economic benefits of rainwater-runoff reduction by urban green spaces. A case study in Beijing, China. In: Journal of Environmental Management, 100, 65-71.