Effects of urbanisation on the water balance - A long-term trajectory

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 211-219

  Haase, Dagmar ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

ABIMO; Imperviousness; Land use change; Leipzig; Messer model; Water balance

Indexed keywords

ABIMO; IMPERVIOUSNESS; LAND USE CHANGE; LEIPZIG; MESSER MODEL; WATER BALANCE;

CLIMATE CHANGE; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; LAND USE; RUNOFF; SOIL TESTING; SOILS; WATER SUPPLY;

WATER RESOURCES;

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; LAND USE; LAND USE CHANGE; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBANIZATION; WATER BUDGET;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; LEIPZIG; SAXONY;

EID: 63749089981     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alberti M. Urban form and ecosystem dynamics: empirical evidence and practical implications. In: Williams K., Burton E., and Jenks M. (Eds). Achieving sustainable urban form (2000), E & FN Spon, London 84-96
2. Alberti M., and Marzluff J.M. Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst 7 3 (2004) 241-265
3. Antrop M. Landscape change and urbanization process in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan 67 1 (2004) 9-26
4. Banzhaf E., Kindler A., and Haase D. Monitoring, mapping and modelling urban decline: a multi-scale approach for Leipzig. EARSeL eProceedings 6 2 (2007) 101-114
5. Batty M, Xie Y, Sun Z, 1999. The Dynamics of Urban Sprawl. CASA Working Paper Series, Paper 15, University College London, Centre for Advanced Spatial Studies (CASA), London.
6. Burchell R.W., and Mukherji S. Conventional development versus managed growth: the costs of sprawl. Am J Public Health 93 9 (2003) 1534-1540
7. Burchell R.W., Lowenstein G., Dolphin W.R., Galley C.C., Downs A., Seskin S., et al. Costs of Sprawl - 2000. Transportation Cooperative Research Program, Report 74 (2002), National Academic Press, Washington D.C.
8. Coldewey W.G., Göbel P., Geiger W.F., Dierkes C., and Kories H. Effects of stormwater infiltration on the water balance of a city-. In: Seiler K.P., and Wohnlich S. (Eds). New approaches characterizing groundwater flow, Proceedings of the XXXI. International Association of Hydrogeologists Congress, Munich, 10.-14. September 2001 (2001), Balkema, Lisse 701-702
9. Collin M.L., and Melloul A.J. Assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution to promote sustainable urban and rural development. J Clean Prod 11 7 (2003) 727-736
10. Couch C., Karecha J., Nuissl H., and Rink D. Decline and sprawl: an evolving type of urban development - observed in Liverpool and Leipzig. Eur Plan Stud 13 1 (2005) 117-136
11. Deal B., and Schunk D. Spatial dynamic modelling and urban land use transformation: a simulation approach to assessing the costs of urban sprawl. Ecol Econ 51 1-2 (2004) 79-95
12. Elvidge CD, Tuttle BT, Sutton PS, Baugh KE, Howard AT, Milesi C et al. Global distribution and density of constructed impervious surfaces. Sensor, in press.
13. Emmerling C., and Udelhoven T. Discriminating factors of spatial variability of soil quality parameters at landscape scale. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165 6 (2002) 706-722
14. Ewing R. Counterpoint: is Los-Angeles-style sprawl desirable?. J Am Plann Assoc 63 1 (1997) 107-126
15. Frede H.G., Bach M., Fohrer N., and Breuer L. Interdisciplinary modeling and the significance of soil functions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165 4 (2002) 460-467
16. Gainsborough J.F. Slow growth and urban sprawl - support for a new regional agenda. Urban Aff Rev 37 5 (2002) 728-744
17. Galster G., Hanson R., Ratcliffe M.R., Wolman H., Coleman S., and Freihage J. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: defining and measuring an elusive concept. Hous Policy Debate 12 4 (2001) 681-717
18. Gill S., Handley J.F., Ennos A.R., and Pauleit S. Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environ 33 1 (2007) 115-133
19. Gill S.E., Handley J.F., Ennos A.R., Pauleit S., Theuray N., and Lindley S. Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 87 (2008) 210-222
20. Glugla G, Fürtig G, 1997. Dokumentation zur Anwendung des Rechenprogramms ABIMO. Mimeograph, Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde, Berlin.
21. Gordon P., and Richardson H.W. The sprawl debate: let markets plan. Publius. J Fed 31 3 (2001) 131-149
22. Grimm N.B., Faeth S.H., Golubiewski N.E., Redman C.L., Wu J., Bai X., et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319 (2008) 756-760
23. Haase D. Holocene floodplains and their distribution in urban areas - functionality indicators for their retention potentials. Landsc Urban Plan 66 (2003) 5-18
24. Haase D., and Nuissl H. Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870-2003. Landsc Urban Plan 80 (2007) 1-13
25. Haase D., Walz U., Neubert M., and Rosenberg M. Changes to Saxon landscapes - analysing historical maps to approach current environmental issues. Land Use Policy 24 (2007) 248-263
26. Hirzel A., Hausser J., Chessel D., and Perrin N. Ecological-niche factor analysis, how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data?. Ecology 83 4 (2002) 2027-2036
27. Imhoff M.L., Tucker C.J., Lawrence W.T., and Stutzer D.C. The use of multisource satellite and geospatial data to study the effect of urbanization on primary productivity in the United. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 38 6 (2000) 2549-2556
28. Interlandi S.J., and Crockett C.S. Recent water quality trends in the Schuykill River, Pennsylvania, USA: a preliminary assessment of the relative influences of climate, river discharge and suburban development. Water Res 37 8 (2003) 1737-1748
29. Johnson L. Western Sydney and the desire for home. Aust J Soc Issues 32 2 (1997) 115-128
30. Johnson M.P. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environ Plann A 33 4 (2001) 717-735
31. Kasanko M., Barredo J.I., Lavalle C., McCormick N., Demicheli L., Sagris V., et al. Are European cities becoming dispersed?. Landsc Urban Plan 77 (2006) 111-130
32. Löfvenhaft K., Björn C., and Ihse M. Biotope patterns in urban areas: a conceptual model integrating biodiversity issues in spatial planning. Landsc Urban Plan 58 2-4 (2002) 223-240
33. Messer J, 1997. Auswirkungen der Urbanisierung auf die Grundwasserneubildung im Ruhrgebiet unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Castroper Hochfläche und des Stadtgebietes Herne. DMT-Berichte aus Forschung und Entwicklung 58, Deutsche Montan Technologie GmbH, Essen.
34. Münchow B, 1999. Bodenbeanspruchung durch Versiegelungsmaßnahmen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Wasserdurchlässigkeit und der bodenbiologischen Aktivität. UFZ-Bericht 4/1999, Leipzig.
35. Newman P. Urban form and environmental performance. In: Williams K., Burton E., and Jenks M. (Eds). Achieving sustainable urban form (2000), E & FN Spon, London 46-53
36. Nuissl H., and Rink D. The 'production' of urban sprawl. Urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of post-socialist transformation. Cities 22 2 (2005) 123-134
37. Nuissl H., Haase D., Wittmer H., and Lanzendorf M. Impact assessment of land use transition in urban areas - an integrated approach from an environmental perspective. Land Use Policy 26 (2008) 414-424 doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.05.006
38. Pauleit S., Ennos R., and Golding Y. Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change - a study in Merseyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 71 2-4 (2005) 295-310
39. Rachimow C 1996. ABIMO 2.1 - Abflussbildungsmodell. Algorithmus zum BAGROV-GLUGLA-Verfahren für die berechnung langjähriger Mittelwerte der Wasserhaushalts-Programmbecshreibung "pro data consulting Claus Rachimow", Rangsdorf.
40. Schetke S., and Haase D. Multi-criteria assessment of socio-environmental aspects in shrinking cities. Experiences from Eastern Germany. Environ Impact Asses Rev 28 (2008) 483-503
41. Schroeder M., and Wyrwich D. Eine in Nordrhein-Westfalen angewendete Methode zur flächendifferenzierten Ermittlung der Grundwasserneubildung. Dtsch Gewässerkdl Mitt. 34 1/2 (1990) 12-16
42. Sieverts T. Cities without cities: an interpretation of the Zwischenstadt (2003), Spon Press, London
43. In: Squires G.D. (Ed). Urban sprawl: causes, consequences and policy responses (2002), The Urban Institute Press, Washington D.C.
44. Steinhardt U., and Volk M. An investigation of water and matter balance on the meso-landscape scale: a hierarchical approach for landscape research. Landsc Ecol 17 4 (2002) 1-12
45. Wessolek G, 1988. Auswirkungen der Bodenversiegelung auf Boden und Wasser. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 8/9, 535-541.
46. Whitford V., Ennos A.R., and Handley J.F. City form and natural process - indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 57 2 (2001) 91-103
47. Wickop E, Böhm P, Eitner K, Breuste J, 1998. Qualitätszielkonzept für Stadtstrukturtypen am Beispiel der Stadt Leipzig. UFZ-Bericht 14/1998, Leipzig.
48. Breuste J (Ed.), 1996. Stadtökologie und Stadtentwicklung: Das Beispiel Leipzig. Analytica, Berlin.