Component-based development and sensitivity analyses of an air pollutant dry deposition model

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 804-816

  Hirabayashi, Satoshi ^a   Kroll, Charles N ^b   Nowak, David J ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b 402 Baker Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Air pollutant; Component based model; Dry deposition; Sensitivity analysis; UFORE

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTANTS; BALTIMORE; COMPONENT BASED APPROACH; COMPONENT-BASED DEVELOPMENT; COMPONENT-BASED MODEL; COMPONENT-BASED MODELING; CORE MODEL; DEPOSITION MODELS; DRY DEPOSITION; DRY DEPOSITION VELOCITIES; INPUT/OUTPUT; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; LEAF AREA INDEX; MODEL COMPONENTS; MODEL PARAMETERS; MONTE CARLO SIMULATION; NEW MODEL; NONLINEAR EFFECT; SEAMLESS INTEGRATION; SENSITIVITY TESTS; TIME STEP; UFORE; URBAN FORESTS; WIND SPEED;

AIR POLLUTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CURING; DEPOSITION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; USER INTERFACES; WIND EFFECTS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; DRY DEPOSITION; LEAF AREA INDEX; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WIND VELOCITY;

BALTIMORE; MARYLAND; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951721267     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Alonso G., Casati F., Kuno H., Machiraju V. Web Services: Concepts, Architectures and Applications 2004, Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Anfossi D., Sacchettit D., Castelli S.T. Development and sensitivity analysis of a Lagrangian particle model for long range dispersion. Environmental Software 1996, 10(4):263-287.
3. Argent R.M. An overview of model integration for environmental applications - components, frameworks and semantics. Environmental Modelling & Software 2004, 19(3):219-234.
4. Baldocchi D. A multi-layer model for estimating sulfur dioxide deposition to a deciduous oak forest canopy. Atmospheric Environment 1988, 22(5):869-884.
5. Baldocchi D. An analytical solution for coupled leaf photosynthesis and stomatal conductance models. Tree Physiology 1994, 14:1069-1079.
6. Baldocchi D.D., Hicks B.B., Camara P. A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces. Atmospheric Environment 1987, 21(1):91-101.
7. Baldocchi D.D., Harley P.C. Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. II. Model testing and application. Plant, Cell and Environment 1995, 18(10):1157-1173.
8. Baldocchi D.D., Wilson K.B. Modeling CO2 and water vapor exchange of a temperate broadleaved forest across hourly to decadal time scales. Ecological Modelling 2001, 142(1-2):155-184.
9. Barnsley M.J. Environmental Modeling: A Practical Introduction 2007, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
10. Bian L. Component modeling for the spatial representation of wildlife movements. Journal of Environmental Management 2000, 59(4):235-245.
11. Bidwell R.G., Fraser D.E. Carbon monoxide uptake and metabolism by leaves. Canadian Journal of Botany 1972, 50(7):1435-1439.
12. Breuer L., Eckhardt K., Frede H.-G. Plant parameter values for models in temperate climates. Ecological Modelling 2003, 169(2-3):237-293.
13. Brook J.R., Zhang L., Li Y., Johnson D. Description and evaluation of a model of deposition velocities for routine estimates of dry deposition over North America. Part II: Review of past measurements and model results. Atmospheric Environment 1999, 33(30):5053-5070.
14. Campolongo F., Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: an application of different analysis methods. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 1997, 57:49-69.
15. Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Saltelli A. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environmental Modelling & Software 2007, 22(10):1509-1518.
16. Caton B.P., Foin T.C., Hill J.E. A plant growth model for integrated weed management in direct-seeded rice I. Development and sensitivity analyses of monoculture growth. Field Crops Research 1999, 62(2-3):129-143.
17. Chappell D. Understanding ActiveX and OLE: A Guide for Developers & Managers 1996, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA.
18. Colbeck I., Harrison R.M. Dry deposition of ozone: some measurements of deposition velocity and of vertical profiles to 100 meters. Atmospheric Environment 1985, 19(11):1807-1818.
19. Collatz G.J., Ball J.T., Grivet C., Berry J.A. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 1991, 54(2-4):107-136.
20. Currie B.A., Bass B. Estimates of air pollution mitigation with green plants and green roofs using the UFORE model. Urban Ecosystems 2008, 11(4):409-422.
21. Davidson C.I., Wu Y.L. Dry deposition of particles and vapors. Sources, Deposition, and Canopy Interactions 1990, vol. 3:103-216. Springer-Verlag, New York. S.E. Lindberg, A.L. Page, S.A. Norton (Eds.).
22. Deutsch B., Whitlow H., Sullivan M., Savineau A. Re-greening Washington, DC: A Green Roof Vision Based on Quantifying Storm Water and Air Quality Benefits 2005, (accessed February 2009). http://www.greenroofs.org/resources/greenroofvisionfordc.pdf.
23. Dyer A.J., Bradley C.F. An alternative analysis of flux gradient relationships. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1982, 22(1):3-19.
24. Farquhar G.D., von Caemmerer S., Berry J.A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 1980, 149(1):78-90.
25. Fowler D. Deposition of SO2 onto plant canopies. Sulfur Dioxide and Vegetation 1985, 389-402. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. W.E. Winner, H.A. Mooney, R.A. Goldstein (Eds.).
26. Fowler D., Cape J.N. Dry deposition of SO2 onto a Scots pine forest. Precipitation Scavenging, Dry Deposition and Resuspension 1983, 763-773. Elsevier, New York. H.R. Pruppacher, R.G. Semonin, W.G.N. Slinn (Eds.).
27. Garland J.A., Branson J.R. The deposition of sulfur dioxide to pine forest assessed by a radioactive tracer method. Tellus 1977, 29:445-454.
28. Greenhut G.K. Resistance of a pine forest to ozone uptake. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1983, 27(4):387-391.
29. Hamby D.M. A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 1994, 32:135-154.
30. Harley P.C., Thomas R.B., Reynolds J.F., Strain B.R. Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell and Environment 1992, 15(3):271-282.
31. Harley P.C., Baldocchi D.D. Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. I. Leaf model parameterization. Plant, Cell and Environment 1995, 18(10):1146-1156.
32. He C., Larsen D.R., Mladenoff D.J. Exploring component-based approaches in forest landscape modeling. Environmental Modelling & Software 2002, 17(6):519-529.
33. Helton J.C. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engineering & Systems Safety 1993, 42(2-3):327-367.
34. Hermann A.J., Stabeno P.J., Haidvogel D.B., Musgrave D.L. A regional tidal/subtidal circulation model of the southeastern Bering Sea: development, sensitivity analyses and hindcasting. Deep-Sea Research II 2002, 49(26):5945-5967.
35. Hosker R.P., Lindberg S.E. Review: atmospheric deposition and plant assimilation of gases and particles. Atmospheric Environment 1982, 16(5):889-910.
36. Hirabayashi S., Kroll C.N., Nowak D.J. UFORE-D Model Descriptions 2010, (accessed August 2010). http://www.itreetools.org/resources/archives.php.
37. Killus J.P., Meyer J.P., Durran D.R., Anderson G.E., Jerskey T.N., Reynolds S.D., Ames J. Continued research in mesoscale air pollution simulation modeling. Refinements in Numerical Analysis, Transport, Chemistry, and Pollutant Removal 1984, vol. V. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, Publ. EPA/600/3.84/095a.
38. Leuning R. Modelling stomatal behavior and photosynthesis of eucalyptus grandis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 1990, 17(2):159-175.
39. Liepmann D., Stephanopoulos G. Development and global sensitivity analysis of a closed ecosystem model. Ecological Modelling 1985, 30(1-2):13-47.
40. Lorenz R., Murphy C.E. The dry deposition of sulfur dioxide on a loblolly pine plantation. Atmospheric Environment 1985, 19(5):797-802.
41. Lovett G.M. Atmospheric deposition of nutrients and pollutants in North America: an ecological perspective. Ecological Applications 1994, 4(4):629-650.
42. Lovett G.M., Lindberg S.E. Dry deposition and canopy exchange in a mixed oak forest as determined by analysis of throughfall. Journal of Applied Ecology 1984, 21(3):1013-1027.
43. MacDougall M., Smith R.I., Scott E.M. Comprehensive sensitivity analysis of an SO2 deposition model for three measurement sites: consequences for SO2 deposition fluxes. Atmospheric Environment 2005, 39:5025-5039.
44. MacKerron D.K.L., Waister P.D. A simple model of potato growth and yield. Part l. Model development and sensitivity analysis. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 1985, 34(2-3):241-252.
45. Maxwell E.L. METSTAT - the solar radiation model used in the production of the national solar radiation database (NSRDB). Solar Energy 1998, 62(4):263-279.
46. McMahon T.A., Denison P.J. Empirical atmospheric deposition parameters - a survey. Atmospheric Environment 1979, 13:571-585.
47. Mészáros R., Zsély I.Gy., Szinyei D., Vincze Cs, Lagzi I. Sensitivity analysis of an ozone deposition model. Atmospheric Environment 2009, 43(3):663-672.
48. Meyers T.P., Baldocchi D.D. Trace gas exchange above the floor of a deciduous forest 2. SO2 and O3 deposition. Journal of Geophysical Research 1993, 98(D7):12631-12638.
49. Microsoft Developer Network (MSDN) COM Clients and Servers 2009, (accessed March 2009). http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms683835(VS.85).aspx.
50. Monteith J.L., Unsworth M.H. Principles of Environmental Physics 1990, Edward Arnold, New York.
51. Morris M.D. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 1991, 33(2):161-174.
52. Murphy C.E., Sigmon J.T. Dry deposition of sulfur and nitrogen oxide gases to forest vegetation. Sources, Deposition, and Canopy Interactions 1990, vol. 3:217-240. Springer-Verlag, New York. S.E. Lindberg, A.L. Page, S.A. Norton (Eds.).
53. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Remote Sensing Tutorial, Section 3 Vegetation Applications - Agriculture, Forestry, and Ecology 2009, (accessed January 2009). http://rst.gsfc.nasa.gov/Sect3/Sect3_1.html.
54. National Climate Data Center (NCDC) World's Largest Archive of Climate Data: National Climate Data Center 2008, (accessed September 2008). http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html.
55. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide - Globally Averaged Marine Surface Annual Mean Data 2010, (accessed November 2010). ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/trends/co2_annmean_gl.txt.
56. Norman J.M. Interfacing leaf and canopy light interception models. Predicting Photosynthesis for Ecosystem Models 1980, vol. II:49-67. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. J.D. Hesketh, J.W. Jones (Eds.).
57. Norman, J.M., 1982. Simulation of microclimates. In: Biometeorology in Integrated Pest Management, 65-99. Proceedings of a Conference on Biometeorology and Integrated Pest Management, Davis, CA.
58. Norton J.P. Algebraic sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environmental Modelling & Software 2008, 23:963-972.
59. Nowak D.J., McHale P.J., Ibarra M., Crane D., Stevens J., Luley C. Modeling the effects of urban vegetation on air pollution. Air Pollution Modeling and its Application XII 1998, 399-407. Plenum Press, New York. S.E. Gryning, N. Chaumerliac (Eds.).
60. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E. The urban forest effects (UFORE) model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. Integrated Tools for Natural Resources Inventories in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference 2000, 714-720. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-212. M. Hansen, T. Burk (Eds.).
61. Nowak D.J., Civerolo K.L., Rao S.T., Sistla G., Juley C.J., Crane D.E. A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. Atmospheric Environment 2000, 34(10):1601-1613.
62. Nowak D.J., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2006, 4(3-4):115-123.
63. Pataki D.E., Bowling D.R., Ehleringer J.R. Seasonal cycle of carbon dioxide and its isotopic composition in an urban atmosphere: anthropogenic and biogenic effects. Journal of Geophysical Research 2003, 108(D23). ACH 8-1-ACH 8-8.
64. Pederson J.R., Massman W.J., Mahrt L., Delany A., Oncley S., Hartog G.den, Neumann H.H., Mickle R.E., Shaw R.H., Paw U.K.T., Grantz D.A., MacPherson J.I., Desjardins R., Schuepp P.H., Pearson R., Arcado T.E. California ozone deposition experiment: methods, results, and opportunities. Atmospheric Environment 1995, 29(21):3115-3132.
65. Pohlert T., Huisman J.A., Breuer L., Frede H.-G. Integration of a detailed biogeochemical model into SWAT for improved nitrogen predictions-model development, sensitivity, and GLUE analysis. Ecological Modelling 2007, 203(3-4):215-228.
66. Ravalico J.K., Maier H.R., Dandy G.C., Norton J.P., Croke B.F.W. A comparison of sensitivity analysis techniques for complex models for environment management. International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Advances and Applications for Management and Decision Making, Melbourne, 12-15 December 2005, 2533-2539. A. Zerger, R.M. Argent (Eds.).
67. Saltelli A., Chan K., Scot E.M. Sensitivity Analysis 2000, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK.
68. Simpson D., Touvinen J.P., Emberson L., Ashmore M.R. Characteristics of an ozone deposition module II: sensitivity analysis. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 2003, 143:123-137.
69. Smith R.I., Fowler D., Sutton M.A., Flechard C., Coyle M. Regional estimation of pollutant gas dry deposition in the UK: model description, sensitivity analyses and outputs. Atmospheric Environment 2000, 34:2757-3777.
70. Taylor G.E., Hanson P.J., Baldocchi D.D. Pollutant deposition to individual leaves and plant canopies: sites of regulation and relationship to injury. Assessment of Crop Loss From Air Pollutants 1988, 227-258. Elsevier Applied Science, London, England. W.W. Heck, O.C. Taylor, D.T. Tingey (Eds.).
71. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) PCRAMMET User's Guide 1995, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
72. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Technology Transfer Network (TTN): Air Quality System (AQS) 2009, (accessed February 2009). http://www.epa.gov/ttn/airs/airsaqs/.
73. van Griensven A., Meixner T., Grunwald S., Bishop T., Diluzio M., Srinivasan R. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. Journal of Hydrology 2006, 324(1-4):10-23.
74. van Ulden A.P., Holtslag A.A.M. Estimation of atmospheric boundary layer parameters for diffusion application. Journal of Climatology and Applied Meteorology 1985, 24(11):1196-1207.
75. Venkatram A. Estimating the Monin-Obukhov length in the stable boundary layer for dispersion calculations. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1980, 19(4):481-485.
76. Vitousek P.M., Mooney H.A., Lubchenco J., Melillo J.M. Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 1997, 277:494-499.
77. Weiler M. An infiltration model based on flow variability in macropores: development, sensitivity analysis and applications. Journal of Hydrology 2005, 310(1-4):294-315.
78. Weiss A., Norman J.M. Partitioning solar radiation into direct and diffuse, visible and near-infrared components. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 1985, 34(2-3):205-213.
79. Wesely M.L. Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmospheric Environment 1989, 23(6):1293-1304.
80. Whittaker R.H., Woodwell G.M. Surface area relations of woody plants and forest communities. American Journal of Botany 1967, 54(8):931-939.
81. Wilson K.B., Baldocchi D.D., Hanson P.J. Leaf age affects the seasonal pattern of photosynthetic capacity and net ecosystem exchange of carbon in a deciduous forest. Plant, Cell and Environment 2001, 24(6):571-583.
82. Wu Y., Brashers B., Finkelstein P.L., Pleim J.E. A multilayer biochemical dry deposition model 2. Model evaluation. Journal of Geophysical Research 2003, 108(1). ACH2-1 - ACH2-16.
83. Zádor J., Zsély I.Gy., Turányi T., Ratto M., Tarantola S., Saltelli A. Local and global uncertainty analyses of a methane flame model. Journal of Physical Chemistry 2005, 109(43):9795-9807.
84. Zhang L., Moran M.D., Makar P.A., Brook J.R., Gong S. Modelling gaseous dry deposition in AURAMS: a unified regional air-quality modelling system. Atmospheric Environment 2002, 36(3):537-560.
85. Zhang L., Brook J.R., Vet R. A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2003, 3(6):2067-2082.
86. Ziehn T., Tomlin A.S. Global sensitivity analysis of a 3D street canyon model-Part I: The development of high dimensional model representations. Atmospheric Environment 2008, 42(8):1857-1873.
87. Zinke P.J. Forest interception studies in the United States. Forest Hydrology 1967, 137-161. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK. W.E. Sopper, H.W. Lull (Eds.).