Model population analysis in chemometrics

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 149, Issue , 2015, Pages 166-176

  Deng, Bai Chuan ^a   Yun, Yong Huan ^a   Liang, Yi Zeng ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Applicability domain; Chemometrics; Model evaluation; Model population analysis; Outlier detection; Variable selection

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMOMETRICS; MODEL POPULATION ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RANDOM SAMPLE; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

EID: 84949317966     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Li H.D., Liang Y.Z., Xu Q.S., Cao D.S. Model-population analysis and its applications in chemical and biological modeling. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 38:154-162.
2. Li H.D., Liang Y.Z., Xu Q.S., Cao D.S. Model population analysis for variable selection. J. Chemom. 2010, 24:418-423.
3. Cao D.S., Liang Y.Z., Xu Q.S., Li H.D., Chen X. A new strategy of outlier detection for QSAR/QSPR. J. Comput. Chem. 2010, 31:592-602.
4. Cai W.S., Li Y.K., Shao X.G. A variable selection method based on uninformative variable elimination for multivariate calibration of near-infrared spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2008, 90:188-194.
5. Li H.D., Zeng M.M., Tan B.B., Liang Y.Z., Xu Q.S., Cao D.S. Recipe for revealing informative metabolites based on model population analysis. Metabolomics 2010, 6:353-361.
6. Yun Y.H., Wang W.T., Tan M.L., Liang Y.Z., Li H.D., Cao D.S., Lu H.M., Xu Q.S. A strategy that iteratively retains informative variables for selecting optimal variable subset in multivariate calibration. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 807:36-43.
7. Deng B.C., Yun Y.H., Liang Y.Z., Yi L.Z. A novel variable selection approach that iteratively optimizes variable space using weighted binary matrix sampling. Analyst 2014, 139:4836-4845.
8. Deng B.-C., Yun Y.-H., Liang Y.-Z., Cao D.-S., Xu Q.-S., Yi L.-Z., Huang X. A new strategy to prevent over-fitting in partial least squares models based on model population analysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 880:32-41.
9. Kaneko H., Funatsu K. Applicability domain based on ensemble learning in classification and regression analyses. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014, 54:2469-2482.
10. Massart D.L., Vandeginste B.G.M., Deming S.N., Michotte Y., Kaufman L. Chemometrics: A Textbook 1988, Elsevier.
11. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 1996, 24:123-140.
12. Freund Y., Schapire R.E. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. ICML 1996, 148-156.
13. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45:5-32.
14. Mevik B.-H., Segtnan V.H., Næs T. Ensemble methods and partial least squares regression. J. Chemom. 2004, 18:498-507.
15. Li H.-D., Xu Q.-S., Liang Y.-Z. Model Population Analysis for Statistical Model Comparison 2012, INTECH Open Access Publisher.
16. Xu Q.S., Liang Y.Z. Monte Carlo cross validation. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 56:1-11.
17. Miller R.G. The jackknife-a review. Biometrika 1974, 61:1-15.
18. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap 1994, CRC press.
19. Barbe P., Bertail P. The Weighted Bootstrap 1995, Springer Science & Business Media.
20. Zhang H.Y., Wang H.Y., Dai Z.J., Chen M.S., Yuan Z.M. Improving accuracy for cancer classification with a new algorithm for genes selection. BMC Bioinf. 2012, 13:298.
21. Efron B., Efron B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans 1982, SIAM.
22. Edgington E., Onghena P. Randomization Tests 2007, CRC Press.
23. Xu H., Liu Z., Cai W., Shao X. A wavelength selection method based on randomization test for near-infrared spectral analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2009, 97:189-193.
24. Faber N., Rajko R. How to avoid over-fitting in multivariate calibration-the conventional validation approach and an alternative. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 595:98-106.
25. Westerhuis J.A., Hoefsloot H.C., Smit S., Vis D.J., Smilde A.K., van Velzen E.J., van Duijnhoven J.P., van Dorsten F.A. Assessment of PLSDA cross validation. Metabolomics 2008, 4:81-89.
26. Lorber A., Kowalski B.R. The effect of interferences and calibration design on accuracy: implications for sensor and sample selection. J. Chemom. 1988, 2:67-79.
27. Guyon I., Elisseeff A. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3:1157-1182.
28. Yun Y.H., Liang Y.Z., Xie G.X., Li H.D., Cao D.S., Xu Q.S. A perspective demonstration on the importance of variable selection in inverse calibration for complex analytical systems. Analyst 2013, 138:6412-6421.
29. Li H.-D., Liang Y.-Z., Long X.-X., Yun Y.-H., Xu Q.-S. The continuity of sample complexity and its relationship to multivariate calibration: a general perspective on first-order calibration of spectral data in analytical chemistry. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2013, 122:23-30.
30. Centner V., Massart D.L., de Noord O.E., de Jong S., Vandeginste B.M., Sterna C. Elimination of uninformative variables for multivariate calibration. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68:3851-3858.
31. Frenich A.G., Jouan-Rimbaud D., Massart D., Kuttatharmmakul S., Galera M.M., Vidal J.M. Wavelength selection method for multicomponent spectrophotometric determinations using partial least squares. Analyst 1995, 120:2787-2792.
32. Han Q.J., Wu H.L., Cai C.B., Xu L., Yu R.Q. An ensemble of Monte Carlo uninformative variable elimination for wavelength selection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 612:121-125.
33. Wang Q., Li H.D., Xu Q.S., Liang Y.Z. Noise incorporated subwindow permutation analysis for informative gene selection using support vector machines. Analyst 2011, 136:1456-1463.
34. Zeng M., Liang Y., Li H., Wang M., Wang B., Chen X., Zhou N., Cao D., Wu J. Plasma metabolic fingerprinting of childhood obesity by GC/MS in conjunction with multivariate statistical analysis. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 52:265-272.
35. Pedersen D.K., Martens H., Nielsen J.P., Engelsen S.B. Near-infrared absorption and scattering separated by Extended Inverted Signal Correction (EISC): analysis of near-infrared transmittance spectra of single wheat seeds. Appl. Spectrosc. 2002, 56:1206-1214.
36. Deng B.C., Yun Y.H., Ma P., Lin C.C., Ren D.B., Liang Y.Z. A new method for wavelength interval selection that intelligently optimizes the locations, widths and combinations of the intervals. Analyst 2015, 140:1876-1885.
37. Yun Y.-H., Wang W.-T., Deng B.-C., Lai G.-B., Liu X.-b., Ren D.-B., Liang Y.-Z., Fan W., Xu Q.-S. Using variable combination population analysis for variable selection in multivariate calibration. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 862:14-23.
38. Li H.D., Liang Y.Z., Xu Q.S., Cao D.S. Key wavelengths screening using competitive adaptive reweighted sampling method for multivariate calibration. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 648:77-84.
39. Zheng K., Li Q., Wang J., Geng J., Cao P., Sui T., Wang X., Du Y. Stability competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (SCARS) and its applications to multivariate calibration of NIR spectra. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2012, 112:48-54.
40. Li H.-D., Xu Q.-S., Liang Y.-Z. Random frog: an efficient reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo-like approach for variable selection with applications to gene selection and disease classification. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 740:20-26.
41. Yun Y.H., Li H.D., Wood L.R.E., Fan W., Wang J.J., Cao D.S., Xu Q.S., Liang Y.Z. An efficient method of wavelength interval selection based on random frog for multivariate spectral calibration. Spectrochim. Acta A 2013, 111:31-36.
42. Li H.D., Liang Y.Z., Xu Q.S., Cao D.S., Tan B.B., Deng B.C., Lin C.C. Recipe for uncovering predictive genes using support vector machines based on model population analysis. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2011, 8:1633-1641.
43. Li H.-D., Xu Q.-S., Zhang W., Liang Y.-Z. Variable complementary network: a novel approach for identifying biomarkers and their mutual associations. Metabolomics 2012, 8:1218-1226.
44. Long X.-X., Li H.-D., Fan W., Xu Q.-S., Liang Y.-Z. A model population analysis method for variable selection based on mutual information. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2013, 121:75-81.
45. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19:716-723.
46. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6:461-464.
47. Mallows C.L. Some comments on Cp. Technometrics 1973, 15:661-675.
48. Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1974, 111-147.
49. Wold S. Cross-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and principal components models. Technometrics 1978, 20:397-405.
50. Héberger K. Sum of ranking differences compares methods or models fairly. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2010, 29:101-109.
51. Rajkó R., Héberger K. Conditional Fisher's exact test as a selection criterion for pair-correlation method. Type I and Type II errors. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 57:1-14.
52. Breiman L. Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures (With Comments and a Rejoinder by the Author) 2001, 199-231.
53. Blumer A., Ehrenfeucht A., Haussler D., Warmuth M.K. Occam's razor. Inf. Process. Lett. 1987, 24:377-380.
54. Rousseeuw P.J., Leroy A.M. Robust Regression and Outlier Detection 2005, John Wiley & Sons.
55. Egan W.J., Morgan S.L. Outlier detection in multivariate analytical chemical data. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70:2372-2379.
56. DePriest S.A., Mayer D., Naylor C.B., Marshall G.R. 3D-QSAR of angiotensin-converting enzyme and thermolysin inhibitors: a comparison of CoMFA models based on deduced and experimentally determined active site geometries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115:5372-5384.
57. Netzeva T.I., Worth A.P., Aldenberg T., Benigni R., Cronin M.T., Gramatica P., Jaworska J.S., Kahn S., Klopman G., Marchant C.A. Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 2005, 33:155-173.
58. Jaworska J., Nikolova-Jeliazkova N., Aldenberg T. QSAR applicability domain estimation by projection of the training set descriptor space: a review. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 2005, 33:445.
59. Yan J., Zhu W.-W., Kong B., Lu H.-B., Yun Y.-H., Huang J.-H., Liang Y.-Z. A combinational strategy of model disturbance and outlier comparison to define applicability domain in quantitative structural activity relationship. Mol. Inf. 2014, 33:503-513.
60. Hou T., Xia K., Zhang W., Xu X. ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 4. Prediction of aqueous solubility based on atom contribution approach. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44:266-275.