Cultivating objects in interaction: Visual motifs as meaning making practices

Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 169-194

  Hazel, Spencer ^a  

^a ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949268531     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1075/z.186.08haz     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Arnold, L. (2012). Dialogic embodied action: Using gesture to organize sequence and participation in instructional interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(3), 269-296. DOI: 10.1080/08351813.2012.699256
2. Ciolek, T. M., & Kendon, A. (1980). Environment and the spatial arrangement of conversational encounters. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3-4), 237-271. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00022.x
3. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
4. De Fornel, M. (1992). The return gesture: Some remarks on context, inference, and iconic gesture. In P. Auer, & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 159-176). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.22.11for
5. Enfield, N. J. (2004). On linear segmentation and combinatorics in co-speech gesture: A symmetry- dominance construction in Lao fish trap descriptions. Semiotica, 149(1/4), 57-123.
6. Enfield, N. J., Kita, S., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2007). Primary and secondary pragmatic functions of pointing gestures. Journal of Pragmatics 39(10), 1722-1741. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma. 2007.03.001
7. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
9. Goodwin, C. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 370-404). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.008
10. Goodwin, C. (2000a). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
11. Goodwin, C. (2000b). Pointing and the collaborative construction of meaning in aphasia. Texas Linguistic Forum, 43, 67-76.
12. Goodwin, C. (2003a). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 3-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Goodwin, C. (2003b). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Goodwin, C. (2003c). The semiotic body in its environment. In J. Coupland, & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourses of the body (pp. 19-42). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
15. Goodwin, C. (2006). Human sociality as mutual orientation in a rich interactive environment: Multimodal utterances and pointing in aphasia. In N. J. Enfield, & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 97-125). London: Berg.
16. Goodwin, C. (2007a). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 195-212). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
17. Goodwin, C. (2007b). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53-73. DOI: 10.1177/0957926507069457
18. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62(1/2), 51-75. DOI: 10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.29
19. Gullberg, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2002). Visual attention towards gestures in face-to-face interaction vs. on screen. In I. Wachsmuth, & T. Sowa (Eds.), Gesture and sign languages in humancomputer interaction (pp. 206-214). Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47873-6_23
20. Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 43-76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511628221
22. Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2003). Transcending the object in embodied interaction. In J. Coupland, & R. Gwyn (Eds.), Discourse, the body and identity (pp. 43-69). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
24. Ho, M. (1994). The leimotiv technique in Puccini's La Boheme, Tosca and Madame Butterfly: A critical examination of transformation processes. PhD dissertation. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.
25. Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. DOI: 10.1177/S0038038501000219
26. Hutchins, E., & Palen, L. (1997). Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In L. B. Resnick, C. Pontecorvo, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 22-40). Berlin: Springer.
27. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-32). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
28. Kataoka, K. (2009). A multi-modal ethnopoetic analysis (Part 1): Text, gesture, and environment in Japanese spatial narrative. Language & Communication, 29, 287-311. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2009.05.003
29. Kataoka, K. (2010). A multi-modal ethnopoetic analysis (Part 2): Catchment, prosody, and frames of reference in Japanese spatial narrative. Language & Communication, 30, 69-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2009.06.002
30. Kendon, A. (1972). Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. Siegman, & B. Pope (Eds.), Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 177-216). New York: Pergamon Press. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7
31. Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relationship of verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207-227). The Hague: Mouton.
32. Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting interaction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kidwell, M. (2000). Common ground in cross-cultural communication: Sequential and institutional contexts in front desk service encounters. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 17-37.
34. Koschmann, T., & LeBaron, C. D. (2002). Learner articulation as interactional achievement: Studying the conversation of gesture. Cognition and Instruction, 20(2), 249-282. DOI: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2002_4
35. Laursen, L. (2005). Towards an embodied grammar: Gesture in tying practices constructing obvious cohesion. Online proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies. ENS LSH & ICAR Research Lab.
36. Lerner, G. (2002). Turn-sharing: The choral co-production of talk-in-interaction. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 225-256). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
37. Local, J. (2004). Getting back to prior talk: and-u(h)m as a skip-connecting device. In E. Couper-Kuhlen, & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction: Cross-linguistic studies from conversation. Studies in linguistic typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
38. McClave, E. Z. (1999). Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 855-878. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00079-X
39. McNeill, D. (1992). Hands and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. McNeill, D. (2000). Catchments and contexts: Non-modular factors in speech and gesture production. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 312-328). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.019
41. Mondada, L. (2003). Working with video: How surgeons produce video records of their actions. Visual Studies, 18(1), 58-73. DOI: 10.1080/1472586032000100083
42. Nevile, M. (2007). Seeing the point: Attention and participation in the airline cockpit. In L. Mondada, & V. Markaki (Eds.), Interacting bodies. Online proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies. ENS LSH & ICAR Research Lab.
43. Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39(2), 119-154. DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3902_1
44. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735. DOI: 10.2307/412243
45. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures' relation to talk. In J. M. Atkinson, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 266-296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Streeck, J. (1993). Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs, 60(4), 275-299. DOI: 10.1080/03637759309376314
47. Streeck, J. (1994). Gesture as communication II: The audience as co-author. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(3), 239-267. DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2703_5
48. Streeck, J. (1996). How to do things with things: Objets trouvés and symbolization. Human Studies, 19, 365-384. DOI: 10.1007/BF00188849
49. Streeck, J. (2009a). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/gs.2
50. Streeck, J. (2009b). Forward-gesturing. Discourse Processes, 46(2-3), 161-179. DOI: 10.1080/01638530902728793