Interpreting Data: The Hybrid Mind

Journal of Chemical Education

Volumn 92, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1988-1995

  Heisterkamp, Kimberly ^a   Talanquer, Vicente ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Chemical Education Research; First Year Undergraduate General; High School Introductory Chemistry; Learning Theories; Misconceptions Discrepant Events

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949024534     PISSN: 00219584     EISSN: 19381328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00589     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. National Research Council (NRC). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2011.
2. National Research Council (NRC). The Next Generation Science Standards; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2013.
3. College Board. Science: College Board Standards for College Success; The College Board: New York, 2009.
4. Osborne, J. F. and Dillon, J. Science Education in Europe; Nuffield Foundation: London, 2008.
5. Talanquer, V.; Pollard, J. Let's Teach How We Think instead of What We Know Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2010, 11, 74-83 10.1039/C005349J
6. Teaching Chemistry-A Studybook; Eilks, I.; Hofstein, A., Eds.; Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, 2013.
7. Cooper, M. M.; Klymkowsky, M. W. Chemistry, Life, the Universe and Everything: A New Approach to General Chemistry, and a Model for Curriculum Reform J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90, 1116-1122 10.1021/ed300456y
8. Sevian, H.; Talanquer, V. Rethinking Chemistry: A Learning Progression on Chemical Thinking Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2014, 15, 10-23 10.1039/C3RP00111C
9. Metz, K. Development of Explanation: Incremental and Fundamental Change in Children's Physics Knowledge J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1991, 28, 785-798 10.1002/tea.3660280906
10. Brewer, W. F.; Chinn, C. A.; Samarapungavan, A. Explanation in Scientists and Children Mind. Mach. 1998, 8, 119-136 10.1023/A:1008242619231
11. Keil, F. C. Explanations and Understanding Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2006, 57, 227-254 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100
12. Grotzer, T. A. Learning to Understand the Forms of Causality Implicit in Scientifically Accepted Explanations Stud. Sci. Educ. 2003, 39, 1-74 10.1080/03057260308560195
13. Perkins, D. N.; Grotzer, T. A. Dimensions of Causal Understanding: The Role of Complex Causal Models in Students' Understanding of Science Stud. Sci. Educ. 2005, 41, 117-166 10.1080/03057260508560216
14. Russ, R.; Scherr, R. E.; Hammer, D.; Mikeska, J. Recognizing Mechanistic Reasoning in Student Scientific Inquiry: A Framework for Discourse Analysis Developed from Philosophy of Science Sci. Educ. 2008, 92, 499-525 10.1002/sce.20264
15. Abrams, E.; Southerland, S.; Cummins, C. The How's and Why's of Biological Change: How Learners Neglect Physical Mechanisms in Search for Meaning Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2001, 23 (12) 1271-1281 10.1080/09500690110038558
16. Talanquer, V. Exploring Dominant Types of Explanations Built by General Chemistry Students Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2010, 32 (18) 2393-2412 10.1080/09500690903369662
17. Talanquer, V. Threshold Concepts in Chemistry: The Critical Role of Implicit Schemas J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (1) 3-9 10.1021/ed500679k
18. Cimpian, A.; Salomon, E. The Inherence Heuristic: An Intuitive Means of Making Sense of the World Behav. Brain. Sci. 2014, 37, 461-527 10.1017/S0140525X13002197
19. Maeyer, J.; Talanquer, V. Making Predictions about Chemical Reactivity: Assumptions and Heuristics J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2013, 50 (6) 748-767 10.1002/tea.21092
20. DeFever, R. S.; Bruce, H.; Bhattacharyya, G. Mental Rolodexing: Senior Chemistry Majors' Understanding of Chemical and Physical Properties J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92, 415-426 10.1021/ed500360g
21. Cooper, M. M.; Corley, L. M.; Underwood, S. M. An Investigation of College Chemistry Students' Understanding of Structure-Property Relationships J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2013, 50 (6) 699-72 10.1002/tea.21093
22. International Handbook of Conceptual Change; Vosniadou, S., Ed.; Routledge: New York, 2008.
23. Vosniadou, S.; Vamvakoussi, X.; Skopeliti, I. The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change. In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change; Vosniadou, S., Ed.; Routledge: New York, 2008; pp 3-34.
24. diSessa, A. A. Toward an Epistemology of Physics Cogn. & Instr. 1993, 10, 105-225 10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
25. Chi, M. T. H. Three Kinds of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Ontological Shift. In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change; Vosniadou, S., Ed.; Routledge: New York, 2008; pp 61-82.
26. diSessa, A. A.; Gillespie, N. M.; Esterly, J. B. Coherence Versus Fragmentation in the Development of the Concept of Force Cognitive Sci. 2004, 28, 843-900 10.1016/j.cogsci.2004.05.003
27. Clark, D. B.; D'Angelo, C. M.; Schleigh, S. P. Comparison of Students' Knowledge Structure Coherence and Understanding of Force in the Philippines, Turkey, China, Mexico, and the United States J. Learn. Sci. 2011, 20, 207-261 10.1080/10508406.2010.508028
28. Brown, D. E.; Hammer, D. Conceptual Change in Physics. In International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change; Vosniadou, S., Ed.; Routledge: New York, 2008; pp 127-154.
29. Taber, K. S. Conceptual Resources for Learning Science: Issues of Transience and Grain-Size in Ccognition and Cognitive Structure J. Learn. Sci. 2008, 30, 1027-1053 10.1080/09500690701485082
30. Brown, D. E. Students' Conceptions as Dynamically Emergent Structures Sci. & Ed. 2014, 23, 1463-1483 10.1007/s11191-013-9655-9
31. Sherin, B. L.; Krakowski, M.; Lee, V. R. Some Assembly Required: How Scientific Explanations Are Constructed During Clinical Interviews J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2012, 49 (2) 166-198 10.1002/tea.20455
32. Talanquer, V. Common Sense Chemistry: A Model for Understanding Students' Alternative Conceptions J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 811-816 10.1021/ed083p811
33. Talanquer, V. How Do Students Reason about Chemical Substances and Reactions? In Concepts of Matter in Science Education; Tsaparlis, G.; Sevian, H., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, 2013; pp 331-346.
34. Taber, K. The Significance of Implicit Knowledge in Teaching and Learning Chemistry Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2014, 15, 447-461 10.1039/C4RP00124A
35. Simon, H. A. Theories of Bounded Rationality. In Decision and Organization; McGuire, C. B.; Radner, R., Eds.; North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1972; pp 161-176.
36. Kahneman, D. Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics Am. Econ. Rev. 2003, 93 (5) 1449-1475 10.1257/000282803322655392
37. Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006.
38. Carey, S. The Origin of Concepts; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2009.
39. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning; Vosniadou, S.; Ortony, A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1989.
40. Cook, N. J.; Breedin, S. D. Constructing Naive Beliefs of Motion on the Fly Mem. Cognit. 1994, 22, 474-493 10.3758/BF03200871
41. Southerland, S. A.; Abrams, E.; Cummins, C. L.; Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding Students' Explanations of Biological Phenomena: Conceptual Frameworks or P-Prims? Sci. Educ. 2001, 85 (4) 328-348 10.1002/sce.1013
42. Shtulman, A.; Valcarcel, J. Scientific Knowledge Suppresses But Does Not Supplant Earlier Intuitions Cognition 2012, 124, 209-215 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.005
43. Leslie, S. J. The Original Sin of Cognition: Fear, Prejudice, and Generalization. J. Philos., in press.
44. Rozier, S.; Viennot, L. Students' Reasoning in Thermodynamics Int. J. Sci. Educ. 1991, 13, 159-170 10.1080/0950069910130203
45. Russ, R. S.; Scherr, R. E.; Hammer, D.; Mikeska, J. Recognizing Mechanistic Reasoning in Student Scientific Inquiry: A Framework for Discourse Analysis Developed from Philosophy of Science Sci. Educ. 2008, 92 (3) 499-525 10.1002/sce.20264
46. Schwartz, D. L.; Bransford, J. D. A Time for Telling Cogn. Instr. 1998, 16, 475-522 10.1207/s1532690xci1604-4
47. Schwartz, D. L.; Chase, C. C.; Oppezzo, M. A.; Chin, D. B. Practicing Versus Inventing With Contrasting Cases: The Effects of Telling First on Learning and Transfer J. Educ. Pysch. 2011, 103 (5) 759-775 10.1037/a0025140
48. Eberlein, T.; Kampmeier, J.; Minderhout, V.; Moog, R. S.; Platt, T.; Varma-Nelson, P.; White, H. B. Pedagogies of Engagement in Science: A Comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2008, 36, 262-273 10.1002/bmb.20204
49. National Research Council. What Research Says about Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2015.