Micropit surfaces designed for accelerating osteogenic differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells via enhancing focal adhesion and actin polymerization

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 2245-2252

  Seo, Chang Ho ^a   Jeong, Heonuk ^a   Feng, Yue ^a   Montagne, Kevin ^b   Ushida, Takashi ^a,b   Suzuki, Yuji ^a   Furukawa, Katsuko S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Actin polymerization; Focal adhesion; Micropit; Osteogenic differentiation

Indexed keywords

ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; BONE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; FOCAL ADHESIONS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MICRO PITS; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; SIGNALING PATHWAYS;

ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; POLYMERIZATION; STEM CELLS; SUBSTRATES;

PROTEINS;

BLEBBISTATIN; MYOSIN II; PROTEIN KINASE; RHOA GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN;

ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BONE CELL; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL SURFACE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; FOCAL ADHESION; GENE EXPRESSION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; WESTERN BLOTTING;

MURINAE;

ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; FOCAL ADHESION; MICROPIT; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION;

ACTINS; ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOPOLYMERS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINE; DNA PRIMERS; FOCAL ADHESIONS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICE; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84891373407     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.089     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lutolf M.P., Gilbert P.M., Blau H.M. Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate. Nature 2009, 462:433-441.
2. Marklein R.A., Burdick J.A. Controlling stem cell fate with material design. Adv Mater 2010, 22:175-189.
3. Place E.S., Evans N.D., Stevens M.M. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2009, 8:457-470.
4. Hench L.L., Polak J.M. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 2002, 295:1014-1017.
5. Caplan A.I. Mesenchymal stem cells: cell-based reconstructive therapy in orthopedics. Tissue Eng 2005, 11:1198-1211.
6. Discher D.E., Mooney D.J., Zandstra P.W. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 2009, 324:1673-1677.
7. Scadden D.T. The stem-cell niche as an entity of action. Nature 2006, 441:1075-1079.
8. Moore K.A., Lemischka I.R. Stem cells and their niches. Science 2006, 311:1880-1885.
9. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
10. Trappmann B., Gautrot J.E., Connelly J.T., Strange D.G.T., Li Y., Oyen M.L., et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat Mater 2012, 11:642-649.
11. Saha K., Keung A.J., Irwin E.F., Li Y., Little L., Schaffer D.V., et al. Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys J 2008, 95:4426-4438.
12. Unadkat H.V., Hulsman M., Cornelissen K., Papenburg B.J., Truckenmuller R.K., Post G.F., et al. An algorithm-based topographical biomaterials library to instruct cell fate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108:16565-16570.
13. Le D.M., Kulangara K., Adler A.F., Leong K.W., Ashby V.S. Dynamic topographical control of mesenchymal stem cells by culture on responsive poly(epsilon-caprolactone) surfaces. Adv Mater 2011, 23:3278-3283.
14. Seo C.H., Furukawa K., Montagne K., Jeong H., Ushida T. The effect of substrate microtopography on focal adhesion maturation and actin organization via the RhoA/ROCK pathway. Biomaterials 2011, 32:9568-9575.
15. Dalby M.J., Gadegaard N., Tare R., Andar A., Riehle M.O., Herzyk P., et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007, 6:997-1003.
16. Gaharwar A.K., Mihaila S.M., Swami A., Patel A., Sant S., Reis R.L., et al. Bioactive silicate nanoplatelets for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Mater 2013, 25:3329-3336.
17. Benoit D.S.W., Schwartz M.P., Durney A.R., Anseth K.S. Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Mater 2008, 7:816-823.
18. Kim D.H., Seo C.H., Han K., Kwon K.W., Levchenko A., Suh K.Y. Guided cell migration on microtextured substrates with variable local density and anisotropy. Adv Funct Mater 2009, 19:1579-1586.
19. Seo C.H., Furukawa K., Suzuki Y., Kasagi N., Ichiki T., Ushida T. Atopographically optimized substrate with well-ordered lattice micropatterns for enhancing the osteogenic differentiation of murine mesenchymal stem cells. Macromol Biosci 2011, 11:938-945.
20. Yim E.K.F., Darling E.M., Kulangara K., Guilak F., Leong K.W. Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2010, 31:1299-1306.
21. Rodriguez J.P., Gonzalez M., Rios S., Cambiazo V. Cytoskeletal organization of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) changes during their osteogenic differentiation. JCell Biochem 2004, 93:721-731.
22. McBeath R., Pirone D.M., Nelson C.M., Bhadriraju K., Chen C.S. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004, 6:483-495.
23. Balaban N.Q., Schwarz U.S., Riveline D., Goichberg P., Tzur G., Sabanay I., et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3:466-472.
24. Lovmand J., Justesen E., Foss M., Lauridsen R.H., Lovmand M., Modin C., et al. The use of combinatorial topographical libraries for the screening of enhanced osteogenic expression and mineralization. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2015-2022.
25. Bettinger C.J., Langer R., Borenstein J.T. Engineering substrate topography at the micro- and nanoscale to control cell function. Angew Chem Int Edit 2009, 48:5406-5415.
26. Humphries J.D., Wang P., Streuli C., Geiger B., Humphries M.J., Ballestrem C. Vinculin controls focal adhesion formation by direct interactions with talin and actin. JCell Biol 2007, 179:1043-1057.
27. Pasapera A.M., Schneider I.C., Rericha E., Schlaepfer D.D., Waterman C.M. Myosin II activity regulates vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions through FAK-mediated paxillin phosphorylation. JCell Biol 2010, 188:877-890.
28. Zamir E., Geiger B. Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. JCell Sci 2001, 114:3583-3590.
29. ChrzanowskaWodnicka M., Burridge K. Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. JCell Biol 1996, 133:1403-1415.
30. Choi C.K., Vicente-Manzanares M., Zareno J., Whitmore L.A., Mogilner A., Horwitz A.R. Actin and alpha-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin II motor-independent manner. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:1039-1050.
31. Etienne-Manneville S., Hall A. Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature 2002, 420:629-635.
32. Tenney R.M., Discher D.E. Stem cells, microenvironment mechanics, and growth factor activation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009, 21:630-635.
33. Martino M.M., Mochizuki M., Rothenfluh D.A., Rempel S.A., Hubbell J.A., Barker T.H. Controlling integrin specificity and stem cell differentiation in 2D and 3D environments through regulation of fibronectin domain stability. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1089-1097.
34. Lutolf M.P., Blau H.M. Artificial stem cell niches. Adv Mater 2009, 21:3255-3268.
35. Oh S., Brammer K.S., Li Y.S.J., Teng D., Engler A.J., Chien S., et al. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:2130-2135.