Singlet-like Higgs bosons at present and future colliders

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1-37

  Buttazzo, Dario ^a   Sala, Filippo ^b   Tesi, Andrea ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics; Supersymmetric Standard Model; Technicolor and Composite Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948733893     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2015)158     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2013) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. G. ’t Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser.B 59 (1980) 135 [INSPIRE].
4. V. Agrawal, S.M. Barr, J.F. Donoghue and D. Seckel, The anthropic principle and the mass scale of the standard model, Phys. Rev.D 57 (1998) 5480 [hep-ph/9707380] [INSPIRE].
5. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie and A.M. Teixeira, The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rept.496 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0910.1785] [INSPIRE].
6. Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh and R. Harnik, The twin Higgs: natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 231802 [hep-ph/0506256] [INSPIRE].
7. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo and A. Strumia, A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests, JHEP08 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1303.7244] [INSPIRE].
8. T. Hambye and A. Strumia, Dynamical generation of the weak and dark matter scale, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055022 [arXiv:1306.2329] [INSPIRE].
9. S. Profumo, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and G. Shaughnessy, Singlet Higgs phenomenology and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP08 (2007) 010 [arXiv:0705.2425] [INSPIRE].
10. D. Curtin, P. Meade and C.-T. Yu, Testing electroweak baryogenesis with future colliders, JHEP11 (2014) 127 [arXiv:1409.0005] [INSPIRE].
11. N. Craig, H.K. Lou, M. McCullough and A. Thalapillil, The Higgs portal above threshold, arXiv:1412.0258 [INSPIRE].
12. CMS collaboration, Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at 7 and 8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 212 [arXiv:1412.8662] [INSPIRE].
13. ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using pp collision data at √s=7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS experiment, ATLAS-CONF-2015-007 (2015).
14. D. Bertolini and M. McCullough, The social Higgs, JHEP12 (2012) 118 [arXiv:1207.4209] [INSPIRE].
15. T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, Status of the Higgs singlet extension of the standard model after LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J.C 75 (2015) 104 [arXiv:1501.02234] [INSPIRE].
16. A. Falkowski, C. Gross and O. Lebedev, A second Higgs from the Higgs portal, JHEP05 (2015) 057 [arXiv:1502.01361] [INSPIRE].
17. M. Gorbahn, J.M. No and V. Sanz, Benchmarks for Higgs effective theory: extended Higgs sectors, JHEP10 (2015) 036 [arXiv:1502.07352] [INSPIRE].
18. F. Gianotti et al., Physics potential and experimental challenges of the LHC luminosity upgrade, Eur. Phys. J.C 39 (2005) 293 [hep-ph/0204087] [INSPIRE].
19. H. Baer et al., The International Linear Collider technical design report — Volume 2: Physics, arXiv:1306.6352 [INSPIRE].
20. L. Linssen, A. Miyamoto, M. Stanitzki and H. Weerts, Physics and detectors at CLIC: CLIC conceptual design report, arXiv:1202.5940 [INSPIRE].
21. −linear collider exploring the terascale: CLIC conceptual design report, arXiv:1209.2543 [INSPIRE].
22. −collider to study the Higgs boson, arXiv:1305.6498 [INSPIRE].
23. M. Ahmad et al., CEPC-SppC preliminary conceptual design report. Volume I: Physics and detector (2015), http://cepc.ihep.ac.cn/preCDR/volume.html.
24. M. Benedikt, Future Circular Collider (FCC) study — status, in Proceedings of 1st Future Hadron Collier Workshop, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014), http://indico.cern.ch/event/304759/contribution/1/material/slides/1.pdf.
25. G. Salam and A. Weiler, Collider Reach (β) (2014), http://collider-reach.web.cern.ch/.
26. A. Thamm, R. Torre and A. Wulzer, Future tests of Higgs compositeness: direct vs indirect, JHEP07 (2015) 100 [arXiv:1502.01701] [INSPIRE].
27. ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Combined measurement of the Higgs boson mass in pp collisions at √s=7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 191803 [arXiv:1503.07589] [INSPIRE].
28. R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, K. Kannike, F. Sala and A. Tesi, Exploring the Higgs sector of a most natural NMSSM, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 115018 [arXiv:1304.3670] [INSPIRE].
29. C.-Y. Chen, S. Dawson and I.M. Lewis, Exploring resonant di-Higgs boson production in the Higgs singlet model, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035015 [arXiv:1410.5488] [INSPIRE].
30. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, I. Masina, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, The universal Higgs fit, JHEP05 (2014) 046 [arXiv:1303.3570] [INSPIRE].
31. A. Falkowski, F. Riva and A. Urbano, Higgs at last, JHEP11 (2013) 111 [arXiv:1303.1812] [INSPIRE].
32. S. Dawson et al., Working Group report: Higgs boson, arXiv:1310.8361 [INSPIRE].
33. ATLAS collaboration, Projections for measurements of Higgs boson signal strengths and coupling parameters with the ATLAS detector at a HL-LHC, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-016 (2014).
34. CMS collaboration, CMS at the high-energy frontier. Contribution to the update of the European strategy for particle physics, CMS-NOTE-2012-006 (2012).
35. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics, JHEP01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
36. J. Baglio et al., The measurement of the Higgs self-coupling at the LHC: theoretical status, JHEP04 (2013) 151 [arXiv:1212.5581] [INSPIRE].
37. R.S. Gupta, H. Rzehak and J.D. Wells, How well do we need to measure the Higgs boson mass and self-coupling?, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055024 [arXiv:1305.6397] [INSPIRE].
38. R. Barbieri, B. Bellazzini, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, The Higgs boson from an extended symmetry, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 115008 [arXiv:0706.0432] [INSPIRE].
39. −1of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-013 (2013).
40. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 092007 [arXiv:1312.5353] [INSPIRE].
41. −1of √s=7 TeV data with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett.B 717 (2012) 29 [arXiv:1205.6744] [INSPIRE].
42. CMS collaboration, Search for a Higgs boson in the mass range from 145 to 1000 GeV decaying to a pair of W or Z bosons, arXiv:1504.00936 [INSPIRE].
43. −qq¯ (Formula presented.) decay channel with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett.B 717 (2012) 70 [arXiv:1206.2443] [INSPIRE].
44. −1of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-067 (2013).
45. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the Higgs boson in the H → W W → ℓνjj decay channel at √s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett.B 718 (2012) 391 [arXiv:1206.6074] [INSPIRE].
46. CMS collaboration, Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the H → W W → ℓνjj decay channel in pp collisions at the LHC, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-027 (2014).
47. ATLAS collaboration, A search for resonant Higgs-pair production in thebb¯bb¯ (Formula presented.)final state in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2014-005 (2014).
48. CMS collaboration, Search for resonant pair production of Higgs bosons decaying to two bottom quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at 8 TeV, Phys. Lett.B 749 (2015) 560 [arXiv:1503.04114] [INSPIRE].
49. ATLAS collaboration, Search for Higgs boson pair production in theγγbb¯(Formula presented.)final state using pp collision data at √s=8 TeV from the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 081802 [arXiv:1406.5053] [INSPIRE].
50. CMS collaboration, Search for resonant HH production in 2γ + 2b channel, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-032 (2013).
51. A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne and G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 63 (2009) 189 [arXiv:0901.0002] [INSPIRE].
52. E. Brownson et al., Heavy Higgs scalars at future hadron colliders (a Snowmass whitepaper), arXiv:1308.6334 [INSPIRE].
53. CMS collaboration, 2HDM neutral Higgs future analysis studies, CMS-PAS-FTR-13-024 (2013).
54. J.M. No and M. Ramsey-Musolf, Probing the Higgs portal at the LHC through resonant di-Higgs production, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 095031 [arXiv:1310.6035] [INSPIRE].
55. V. Martín Lozano, J.M. Moreno and C.B. Park, Resonant Higgs boson pair production in thehh→bb¯WW→bb¯ℓ+νℓ−ν¯ (Formula presented.)decay channel, JHEP08 (2015) 004 [arXiv:1501.03799] [INSPIRE].
56. A.V. Kotwal, S. Chekanov and M. Low, Double Higgs boson production in the 4τ channel from resonances in longitudinal vector boson scattering at a 100 TeV collider, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 114018 [arXiv:1504.08042] [INSPIRE].
57. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, J.R. Andersen et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties, arXiv:1307.1347 [INSPIRE].
58. M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz and P.M. Zerwas, Higgs boson production at the LHC, Nucl. Phys.B 453 (1995) 17 [hep-ph/9504378] [INSPIRE].
59. M. Spira, HIGLU: a program for the calculation of the total Higgs production cross-section at hadron colliders via gluon fusion including QCD corrections, hep-ph/9510347 [INSPIRE].
60. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
61. M. Carena, M. Quirós and C.E.M. Wagner, Effective potential methods and the Higgs mass spectrum in the MSSM, Nucl. Phys.B 461 (1996) 407 [hep-ph/9508343] [INSPIRE].
62. L.J. Hall, D. Pinner and J.T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126 GeV, JHEP04 (2012) 131 [arXiv:1112.2703] [INSPIRE].
63. T. Gherghetta, B. von Harling, A.D. Medina and M.A. Schmidt, The scale-invariant NMSSM and the 126 GeV Higgs boson, JHEP02 (2013) 032 [arXiv:1212.5243] [INSPIRE].
64. K. Agashe, Y. Cui and R. Franceschini, Natural islands for a 125 GeV Higgs in the scale-invariant NMSSM, JHEP02 (2013) 031 [arXiv:1209.2115] [INSPIRE].
65. J.R. Espinosa and M. Quirós, On Higgs boson masses in nonminimal supersymmetric standard models, Phys. Lett.B 279 (1992) 92 [INSPIRE].
66. S.F. King, M. Mühlleitner, R. Nevzorov and K. Walz, Discovery prospects for NMSSM Higgs bosons at the high-energy Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 095014 [arXiv:1408.1120] [INSPIRE].
67. R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, K. Kannike, F. Sala and A. Tesi, One or more Higgs bosons?, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055011 [arXiv:1307.4937] [INSPIRE].
68. R. Barbieri and A. Tesi, Higgs couplings and electroweak observables: a comparison of precision tests, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 055019 [arXiv:1311.7493] [INSPIRE].
69. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, Y. Nomura and V.S. Rychkov, Supersymmetry without a light Higgs boson, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 035007 [hep-ph/0607332] [INSPIRE].
70. ATLAS collaboration, Statistical combination of all-hadronic and one-lepton analyses targeting scalar top pair production using proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2015-010 (2015).
71. CMS collaboration, Searches for third-generation squark production in fully hadronic final states in proton-proton collisions at √s=8 TeV, JHEP06 (2015) 116 [arXiv:1503.08037] [INSPIRE].
72. CMS collaboration, Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to a pair of tau leptons in pp collisions, JHEP10 (2014) 160 [arXiv:1408.3316] [INSPIRE].
73. ATLAS collaboration, Search for neutral Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in pp collisions at √s=8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11 (2014) 056 [arXiv:1409.6064] [INSPIRE].
74. J. Cao, D. Li, L. Shang, P. Wu and Y. Zhang, Exploring the Higgs sector of a most natural NMSSM and its prediction on Higgs pair production at the LHC, JHEP12 (2014) 026 [arXiv:1409.8431] [INSPIRE].
75. R. Barbieri, T. Gregoire and L.J. Hall, Mirror world at the Large Hadron Collider, hep-ph/0509242 [INSPIRE].
76. A. Falkowski, S. Pokorski and M. Schmaltz, Twin SUSY, Phys. Rev.D 74 (2006) 035003 [hep-ph/0604066] [INSPIRE].
77. S. Chang, L.J. Hall and N. Weiner, A supersymmetric twin Higgs, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 035009 [hep-ph/0604076] [INSPIRE].
78. N. Craig and K. Howe, Doubling down on naturalness with a supersymmetric twin Higgs, JHEP03 (2014) 140 [arXiv:1312.1341] [INSPIRE].
79. N. Craig, A. Katz, M. Strassler and R. Sundrum, Naturalness in the dark at the LHC, JHEP07 (2015) 105 [arXiv:1501.05310] [INSPIRE].
80. G. Burdman, Z. Chacko, R. Harnik, L. de Lima and C.B. Verhaaren, Colorless top partners, a 125 GeV Higgs and the limits on naturalness, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 055007 [arXiv:1411.3310] [INSPIRE].
81. M. Geller and O. Telem, Holographic twin Higgs model, Phys. Rev. Lett.114 (2015) 191801 [arXiv:1411.2974] [INSPIRE].
82. R. Barbieri, D. Greco, R. Rattazzi and A. Wulzer, The composite twin Higgs scenario, JHEP08 (2015) 161 [arXiv:1501.07803] [INSPIRE].
83. M. Low, A. Tesi and L.-T. Wang, Twin Higgs mechanism and a composite Higgs boson, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 095012 [arXiv:1501.07890] [INSPIRE].
84. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 719 (2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089] [INSPIRE].
85. R. Contino, The Higgs as a composite Nambu-Goldstone boson, arXiv:1005.4269 [INSPIRE].
86. R. Contino, D. Marzocca, D. Pappadopulo and R. Rattazzi, On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology, JHEP10 (2011) 081 [arXiv:1109.1570] [INSPIRE].
87. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak precision observables, new physics and the nature of a 126 GeV Higgs boson, JHEP08 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1306.4644] [INSPIRE].
88. G. Panico and A. Wulzer, The composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs, arXiv:1506.01961 [INSPIRE].
89. C. Grojean, O. Matsedonskyi and G. Panico, Light top partners and precision physics, JHEP10 (2013) 160 [arXiv:1306.4655] [INSPIRE].
90. A. Azatov, R. Contino, A. Di Iura and J. Galloway, New prospects for Higgs compositeness in h → Zγ, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 075019 [arXiv:1308.2676] [INSPIRE].
91. S. Mishima, Sensitivity to new physics from TLEP precision measurements, in Proceedings of the 6th TLEP Workshop, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013), http://indico.cern.ch/event/257713/session/1/contribution/30.
92. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Possible futures of electroweak precision: ILC, FCC-ee and CEPC, JHEP09 (2015) 196 [arXiv:1411.1054] [INSPIRE].
93. R.K. Ellis, W.J. Stirling and B.R. Webber, QCD and collider physics, Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol.8 (1996) 1 [INSPIRE].