A modified naturalness principle and its experimental tests

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Farina, Marco ^a   Pappadopulo, Duccio ^b,c   Strumia, Alessandro ^d,e  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d INFN SEZIONE DI PISA   (Italy)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS AND BIOPHYSICS   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Standard Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881275433     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2013)022     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. G. 't Hooft, Naturalness, chiral symmetry and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, in Recent developments in gauge theories, G. 't Hooft ed., Plenum Press, U.S.A. (1980).
2. L. Giusti, A. Romanino and A. Strumia, Natural ranges of supersymmetric signals, Nucl. Phys. B 550 (1999) 3 [ hep-ph/9811386 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. A. Strumia, Naturalness of supersymmetric models, hep-ph/9904247 [ INSPIRE ].
4. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, The 'LEP paradox', hep-ph/0007265 [ INSPIRE ].
5. H. Baer et al., Radiative natural supersymmetry: reconciling electroweak fine-tuning and the Higgs boson mass, arXiv:1212.2655 [ INSPIRE ].
6. V. Agrawal, S.M. Barr, J.F. Donoghue and D. Seckel, Anthropic considerations in multiple domain theories and the scale of electroweak symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 1822 [ hep-ph/9801253 ] [ INSPIRE ].
7. F. Englert, C. Truffin and R. Gastmans, Conformal invariance in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 117 (1976) 407 [ INSPIRE ].
8. W. Bardeen, On naturalness in the standard model, FERMILAB-CONF-95-391-T (1995).
9. C.T. Hill, Conjecture on the physical implications of the scale anomaly, hep-th/0510177 [ INSPIRE ].
10. K.A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Conformal symmetry and the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 648 (2007) 312 [ hep-th/0612165 ] [ INSPIRE ].
11. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, K.L. McDonald and R.R. Volkas, A solution to the hierarchy problem from an almost decoupled hidden sector within a classically scale invariant theory, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 035006 [ arXiv:0709.2750 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. - L extended standard model, Phys. Lett. B 676 (2009) 81 [ arXiv:0902.4050 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. S. Iso, N. Okada and Y. Orikasa, The minimal B-L model naturally realized at TeV scale, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 115007 [ arXiv:0909.0128 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. D. Anselmi and M. Taiuti, Renormalization of high-energy Lorentz violating QED, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 085042 [ arXiv:0912.0113 ] [ INSPIRE ].
15. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze and R.R. Volkas, Stable mass hierarchies and dark matter from hidden sectors in the scale-invariant standard model, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 035005 [ arXiv:1006.0131 ] [ INSPIRE ].
16. P. Jain, S. Mitra, S. Panda and N.K. Singh, Scale invariance as a solution to the cosmological constant problem, arXiv:1010.3483 [ INSPIRE ].
17. M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenhausern, Quantum scale invariance, cosmological constant and hierarchy problem, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 162 [ arXiv:0809.3406 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. F. Bezrukov, G.K. Karananas, J. Rubio and M. Shaposhnikov, Higgs-dilaton cosmology: an effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 096001 [ arXiv:1212.4148 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. S. Iso and Y. Orikasa, TeV Scale B-L model with a flat Higgs potential at the Planck scale - In view of the hierarchy problem, PTEP 2013 (2013) 023B08 [ arXiv:1210.2848 ] [ INSPIRE ].
20. C. Englert, J. Jaeckel, V. Khoze and M. Spannowsky, Emergence of the electroweak scale through the Higgs portal, JHEP 04 (2013) 060 [ arXiv:1301.4224 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. K.R. Dienes, Solving the hierarchy problem without supersymmetry or extra dimensions: An Alternative approach, Nucl. Phys. B 611 (2001) 146 [ hep-ph/0104274 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 33376544)
22. G. Degrassi et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO, JHEP 08 (2012) 098 [ arXiv:1205.6497 ] [ INSPIRE ].
23. F. Bezrukov, M.Y. Kalmykov, B.A. Kniehl and M. Shaposhnikov, Higgs Boson Mass and New Physics, JHEP 10 (2012) 140 [ arXiv:1205.2893 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, arXiv:1307.3536 [ INSPIRE ].
25. J. Fleischer and F. Jegerlehner, Radiative corrections to Higgs decays in the extended Weinberg-Salam model, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2001 [ INSPIRE ].
26. S.P. Martin, Three-loop corrections to the lightest Higgs scalar boson mass in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 055005 [ hep-ph/0701051 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. K. Chetyrkin and M. Zoller, β-function for the Higgs self-interaction in the Standard Model at three-loop level, JHEP 04 (2013) 091 [ arXiv:1303.2890 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. A. Bednyakov, A. Pikelner and V. Velizhanin, Higgs self-coupling β-function in the standard model at three loops, arXiv:1303.4364 [ INSPIRE ].
29. A. Strumia and F. Vissani, Neutrino masses and mixings and., hep-ph/0606054 [ INSPIRE ].
30. F. Vissani, Do experiments suggest a hierarchy problem?, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 7027 [ hep-ph/9709409 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. G. Giudice, A. Notari, M. Raidal, A. Riotto and A. Strumia, Towards a complete theory of thermal leptogenesis in the SM and MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 685 (2004) 89 [ hep-ph/0310123 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 38457843)
32. S.P. Martin, Two loop effective potential for a general renormalizable theory and softly broken supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 116003 [ hep-ph/0111209 ] [ INSPIRE ].
33. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 1. Wave function renormalization, Nucl. Phys. B 222 (1983) 83 [ INSPIRE ].
34. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 2. Yukawa couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 236 (1984) 221 [ INSPIRE ].
35. M.E. Machacek and M.T. Vaughn, Two loop renormalization group equations in a general quantum field theory. 3. Scalar quartic couplings, Nucl. Phys. B 249 (1985) 70 [ INSPIRE ].
36. T. Hambye, Y. Lin, A. Notari, M. Papucci and A. Strumia, Constraints on neutrino masses from leptogenesis models, Nucl. Phys. B 695 (2004) 169 [ hep-ph/0312203 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 39122292)
37. A. Strumia, Sommerfeld corrections to type-II and III leptogenesis, Nucl. Phys. B 809 (2009) 308 [ arXiv:0806.1630 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. E. Ma and D. Roy, Heavy triplet leptons and new gauge boson, Nucl. Phys. B 644 (2002) 290 [ hep-ph/0206150 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. B. Bajc and G. Senjanović, Seesaw at LHC, JHEP 08 (2007) 014 [ hep-ph/0612029 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. B. Bajc, M. Nemevšek and G. Senjanović, Probing seesaw at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 055011 [ hep-ph/0703080 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. R. Franceschini, T. Hambye and A. Strumia, Type-III see-saw at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 033002 [ arXiv:0805.1613 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. F. del Aguila and J. Aguilar-Saavedra, Distinguishing seesaw models at LHC with multi-lepton signals, Nucl. Phys. B 813 (2009) 22 [ arXiv:0808.2468 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. M.A. Schmidt, Renormalization group evolution in the type I + II seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 073010 [Erratum ibid. D 85 (2012) 099903] [ arXiv:0705.3841 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. W. Chao and H. Zhang, One-loop renormalization group equations of the neutrino mass matrix in the triplet seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 033003 [ hep-ph/0611323 ] [ INSPIRE ].
45. K. Huitu, J. Maalampi, A. Pietila and M. Raidal, Doubly charged Higgs at LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 487 (1997) 27 [ hep-ph/9606311 ] [ INSPIRE ].
46. A. Hektor, M. Kadastik, M. Muntel, M. Raidal and L. Rebane, Testing neutrino masses in little Higgs models via discovery of doubly charged Higgs at LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 787 (2007) 198 [ arXiv:0705.1495 ] [ INSPIRE ].
47. E.J. Chun, K.Y. Lee and S.C. Park, Testing Higgs triplet model and neutrino mass patterns, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 142 [ hep-ph/0304069 ] [ INSPIRE ].
48. M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, A note on doubly charged Higgs pair production at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 117701 [ hep-ph/0305288 ] [ INSPIRE ].
49. P. Fileviez Perez, T. Han, G.-Y. Huang, T. Li and K. Wang, Testing a neutrino mass generation mechanism at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 071301 [ arXiv:0803.3450 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. W. Chao, Z.-G. Si, Z.-z. Xing and S. Zhou, Correlative signatures of heavy Majorana neutrinos and doubly-charged Higgs bosons at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Lett. B 666 (2008) 451 [ arXiv:0804.1265 ] [ INSPIRE ].
51. P. Fileviez Perez, T. Han, G.-y. Huang, T. Li and K. Wang, Neutrino masses and the CERN LHC: testing type II seesaw, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 015018 [ arXiv:0805.3536 ] [ INSPIRE ].
52. CMS collaboration, A search for a doubly-charged Higgs boson in pp collisions at \sqrt{s}=7 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2189 [ arXiv:1207.2666 ] [ INSPIRE ].
53. T. Hambye, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Efficiency and maximal CP-asymmetry of scalar triplet leptogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 667 [ hep-ph/0510008 ] [ INSPIRE ].
54. M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo and A. Strumia, Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006) 178 [ hep-ph/0512090 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 44276369)
55. C. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys. B 619 (2001) 709 [ hep-ph/0011335 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 33376582)
56. Y.G. Kim, K.Y. Lee and S. Shin, Singlet fermionic dark matter, JHEP 05 (2008) 100 [ arXiv:0803.2932 ] [ INSPIRE ].
57. S. Baek, P. Ko and W.-I. Park, Search for the Higgs portal to a singlet fermionic dark matter at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2012) 047 [ arXiv:1112.1847 ] [ INSPIRE ].
58. L. Lopez-Honorez, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter and a Standard Model like Higgs at 125 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 179 [ arXiv:1203.2064 ] [ INSPIRE ].
59. Planck collaboration, P. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1303.5076 [ INSPIRE ].
60. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and M. Tamburini, Cosmology and astrophysics of minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 787 (2007) 152 [ arXiv:0706.4071 ] [ INSPIRE ].
61. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata and N. Nagata, Gluon contribution to the dark matter direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 115007 [ arXiv:1007.2601 ] [ INSPIRE ].
62. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Universal behavior in the scattering of heavy, weakly interacting dark matter on nuclear targets, Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012) 539 [ arXiv:1111.0016 ] [ INSPIRE ].
63. P. Junnarkar and A. Walker-Loud, The scalar strange content of the nucleon from lattice QCD, arXiv:1301.1114 [ INSPIRE ].
64. J. Hisano, K. Ishiwata and N. Nagata, Direct search of dark matter in high-scale supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 035020 [ arXiv:1210.5985 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. R. Peccei and H.R. Quinn, Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the presence of instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1791 [ INSPIRE ].
66. S. Weinberg, A new light boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223 [ INSPIRE ].
67. G.G. Raffelt, Axion constraints from white dwarf cooling times, Phys. Lett. B 166 (1986) 402 [ INSPIRE ].
68. M. Nakagawa, Y. Kohyama and N. Itoh, Axion bremsstrahlung in dense stars, Astrophys. J. 322 (1987) 291.
69. J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 127 [ INSPIRE ].
70. L. Abbott and P. Sikivie, A cosmological bound on the invisible axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 133 [ INSPIRE ].
71. M. Dine and W. Fischler, The not so harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983) 137 [ INSPIRE ].
72. J.E. Kim, Weak-interaction singlet and strong CP invariance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 103.
73. M.A. Shifman, V.I. Vainstein and V.I. Zakharov, Can confinement ensure natural CP invariance of strong interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493.
74. M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, A simple solution to the strong CP problem with a harmless axion, Phys. Lett. B 104 (1981) 199 [ INSPIRE ].
75. A. Zhitnitsky, On possible suppression of the axion hadron interactions (in Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31 (1980) 260 [ INSPIRE ].
76. M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi and M. Raidal, Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology, JHEP 05 (2012) 061 [ arXiv:1112.3647 ] [ INSPIRE ].
77. M. Gonderinger, H. Lim and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Complex scalar singlet dark matter: vacuum stability and phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 043511 [ arXiv:1202.1316 ] [ INSPIRE ].
78. ++, JHEP 02 (2013) 074 [ arXiv:1208.2821 ] [ INSPIRE ].
79. W. Chao, M. Gonderinger and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Higgs vacuum stability, neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 113017 [ arXiv:1210.0491 ] [ INSPIRE ].
80. W. Chao, J.-H. Zhang and Y. Zhang, Vacuum stability and Higgs diphoton decay rate in the Zee-Babu model, JHEP 06 (2013) 039 [ arXiv:1212.6272 ] [ INSPIRE ].
81. P.S.B. Bhupal Dev, D.K. Ghosh, N. Okada and I. Saha, 125 GeV Higgs boson and the type-II seesaw model, JHEP 03 (2013) 150 [Erratum ibid. 1305 (2013) 049] [ arXiv:1301.3453 ] [ INSPIRE ].
82. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee and A. Strumia, Stabilization of the electroweak vacuum by a scalar threshold effect, JHEP 06 (2012) 031 [ arXiv:1203.0237 ] [ INSPIRE ].
83. A.H. Chamseddine and A. Connes, Resilience of the spectral standard model, JHEP 09 (2012) 104 [ arXiv:1208.1030 ] [ INSPIRE ].
84. L. Knox and M.S. Turner, Inflation at the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 371 [ astro-ph/9209006 ] [ INSPIRE ].
85. L. Boyle, S. Farnsworth, J. Fitzgerald and M. Schade, The Minimal Dimensionless Standard Model (MDSM) and its cosmology, arXiv:1111.0273 [ INSPIRE ].