Possible futures of electroweak precision: ILC, FCC-ee, and CEPC

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Fan, JiJi ^a   Reece, Matthew ^b   Wang, Lian Tao ^c  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics; LEP HERA and SLC Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943171880     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP09(2015)196     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. H. Baer et al., The International Linear Collider technical design report — volume 2: physics, arXiv:1306.6352 [INSPIRE].
2. TLEP Design Study Working Group collaboration, M. Bicer et al., First look at the physics case of TLEP, JHEP01 (2014) 164 [arXiv:1308.6176] [INSPIRE].
3. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev.D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
4. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 964 [INSPIRE].
5. D.C. Kennedy and B.W. Lynn, Electroweak radiative corrections with an effective Lagrangian: four fermion processes, Nucl. Phys.B 322 (1989) 1 [INSPIRE].
6. B. Holdom and J. Terning, Large corrections to electroweak parameters in technicolor theories, Phys. Lett.B 247 (1990) 88 [INSPIRE].
7. M. Golden and L. Randall, Radiative corrections to electroweak parameters in technicolor theories, Nucl. Phys.B 361 (1991) 3 [INSPIRE].
8. Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev.D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].
9. Z. Han, Effective theories and electroweak precision constraints, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 23 (2008) 2653 [arXiv:0807.0490] [INSPIRE].
10. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
11. M. Drees, K. Hagiwara and A. Yamada, Process independent radiative corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev.D 45 (1992) 1725 [INSPIRE].
12. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Precision natural SUSY at CEPC, FCC-ee and ILC, JHEP08 (2015) 152 [arXiv:1412.3107] [INSPIRE].
13. U. Baur and M. Demarteau, Precision electroweak physics at future collider experiments, eConfC 960625 (1996) LTH085 [hep-ph/9611334] [INSPIRE].
14. J.F. Gunion, L. Poggioli, R.J. Van Kooten, C. Kao and P. Rowson, Higgs boson discovery and properties, eConfC 960625 (1996) LTH092 [hep-ph/9703330] [INSPIRE].
15. S. Heinemeyer, T. Mannel and G. Weiglein, Implications of results from Z threshold running and W W threshold running, hep-ph/9909538 [INSPIRE].
16. R. Hawkings and K. Monig, Electroweak and CP-violation physics at a linear collider Z factory, Eur. Phys. J. directC 1 (1999) 8 [hep-ex/9910022] [INSPIRE].
17. J. Erler, S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, G. Weiglein and P.M. Zerwas, Physics impact of GigaZ, Phys. Lett.B 486 (2000) 125 [hep-ph/0005024] [INSPIRE].
18. D.M. Asner et al., ILC Higgs white paper, arXiv:1310.0763 [INSPIRE].
19. S. Dawson et al., Working group report: Higgs boson, arXiv:1310.8361 [INSPIRE].
20. M. Baak et al., Working group report: precision study of electroweak interactions, arXiv:1310.6708 [INSPIRE].
21. S. Mishima, Sensitivity to new physics from TLEP precision measurements, in 6thTLEP workshop, CERN, Geneva Switzerland October 16 2013.
22. B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, What do precision Higgs measurements buy us?, arXiv:1404.1058 [INSPIRE].
23. Gfitter Group collaboration, M. Baak et al., The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3046 [arXiv:1407.3792] [INSPIRE].
24. M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas and G. Weiglein, Precise prediction for the W boson mass in the standard model, Phys. Rev.D 69 (2004) 053006 [hep-ph/0311148] [INSPIRE].
25. M. Awramik, M. Czakon and A. Freitas, Electroweak two-loop corrections to the effective weak mixing angle, JHEP11 (2006) 048 [hep-ph/0608099] [INSPIRE].
26. A. Freitas, Higher-order electroweak corrections to the partial widths and branching ratios of the Z boson, JHEP04 (2014) 070 [arXiv:1401.2447] [INSPIRE].
27. SLD Electroweak Group, DELPHI, ALEPH, SLD, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group and L3 collaborations, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept.427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].
28. R. Barbieri and G.F. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys.B 306 (1988) 63 [INSPIRE].
29. P. Stewart, Concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, U.S.A. (1964).
30. I. Maksymyk, C.P. Burgess and D. London, Beyond S, T and U, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 529 [hep-ph/9306267] [INSPIRE].
31. C.P. Burgess, S. Godfrey, H. Konig, D. London and I. Maksymyk, A global fit to extended oblique parameters, Phys. Lett.B 326 (1994) 276 [hep-ph/9307337] [INSPIRE].
32. C.P. Burgess, S. Godfrey, H. Konig, D. London and I. Maksymyk, Model independent global constraints on new physics, Phys. Rev.D 49 (1994) 6115 [hep-ph/9312291] [INSPIRE].
33. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak precision observables, new physics and the nature of a 126 GeV Higgs boson, JHEP08 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1306.4644] [INSPIRE].
34. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys.B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
35. P.L. Cho and E.H. Simmons, Searching for G3intt¯$$ t\overline{t} $$production, Phys. Rev.D 51 (1995) 2360 [hep-ph/9408206] [INSPIRE].
36. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics (RPP), Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
37. G.P. Lepage, P.B. Mackenzie and M.E. Peskin, Expected precision of Higgs boson partial widths within the standard model, arXiv:1404.0319 [INSPIRE].
38. S. Bodenstein, C.A. Dominguez, K. Schilcher and H. Spiesberger, Hadronic contribution to the QED running coupling α(MZ 2), Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 093013 [arXiv:1209.4802] [INSPIRE].
39. ATLAS, CDF, CMS and D0 collaborations, First combination of Tevatron and LHC measurements of the top-quark mass, arXiv:1403.4427 [INSPIRE].
40. A. Freitas et al., Exploring quantum physics at the ILC, arXiv:1307.3962 [INSPIRE].
41. ECFA/DESY LC Physics Working Group collaboration, J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra et al., TESLA: the superconducting electron positron linear collider with an integrated X-ray laser laboratory. Technical design report. Part 3. Physics at an e+e−linear collider, hep-ph/0106315 [INSPIRE].
42. J. Erler and F. Ayres, Electroweak model and constraints on new physics, Particle Data Group review, (2013).
43. Z. Liang, Z and W physics at CEPC, talk at the Fourth International Workshop on Future High Energy Circular Colliders, Shanghai China September 12-13 2014.
44. CMS collaboration, Combination of the CMS top-quark mass measurements from Run 1 of the LHC, CMS-PAS-TOP-14-015, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014).
45. D0 collaboration, V.M. Abazov et al., Precision measurement of the top-quark mass in lepton+jets final states, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 032002 [arXiv:1405.1756] [INSPIRE].
46. A.H. Hoang and I.W. Stewart, Top mass measurements from jets and the Tevatron top-quark mass, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.185 (2008) 220 [arXiv:0808.0222] [INSPIRE].
47. A. Buckley et al., General-purpose event generators for LHC physics, Phys. Rept.504 (2011) 145 [arXiv:1101.2599] [INSPIRE].
48. A. Juste et al., Determination of the top quark mass circa 2013: methods, subtleties, perspectives, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3119 [arXiv:1310.0799] [INSPIRE].
49. Top Quark Working Group collaboration, K. Agashe et al., Working group report: top quark, arXiv:1311.2028 [INSPIRE].
50. S. Moch et al., High precision fundamental constants at the TeV scale, arXiv:1405.4781 [INSPIRE].
51. F. Bezrukov, M. Yu. Kalmykov, B.A. Kniehl and M. Shaposhnikov, Higgs boson mass and new physics, JHEP10 (2012) 140 [arXiv:1205.2893] [INSPIRE].
52. G. Degrassi et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the standard model at NNLO, JHEP08 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1205.6497] [INSPIRE].
53. D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP12 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1307.3536] [INSPIRE].
54. A. Andreassen, W. Frost and M.D. Schwartz, Consistent use of the standard model effective potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 241801 [arXiv:1408.0292] [INSPIRE].
55. ATLAS and CMS collaborations, M.S. Kim, LHC top mass: alternative methods and prospects for the future, arXiv:1404.1013 [INSPIRE].
56. S. Kawabata, Y. Shimizu, Y. Sumino and H. Yokoya, Weight function method for precise determination of top quark mass at Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Lett.B 741 (2015) 232 [arXiv:1405.2395] [INSPIRE].
57. S. Frixione and A. Mitov, Determination of the top quark mass from leptonic observables, JHEP09 (2014) 012 [arXiv:1407.2763] [INSPIRE].
58. S. Argyropoulos and T. Sjöstrand, Effects of color reconnection on tt final states at the LHC, JHEP11 (2014) 043 [arXiv:1407.6653] [INSPIRE].
59. K. Seidel, F. Simon, M. Tesar and S. Poss, Top quark mass measurements at and above threshold at CLIC, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2530 [arXiv:1303.3758] [INSPIRE].
60. T. Horiguchi et al., Study of top quark pair production near threshold at the ILC, arXiv:1310.0563 [INSPIRE].
61. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic contributions to the muon g − 2 and to α(MZ 2), Eur. Phys. J.C 71 (2011) 1515 [Erratum ibid.C 72 (2012) 1874] [arXiv:1010.4180] [INSPIRE].
62. K. Hagiwara, R. Liao, A.D. Martin, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, (g − 2)μand α(MZ 2) re-evaluated using new precise data, J. Phys.G 38 (2011) 085003 [arXiv:1105.3149] [INSPIRE].
63. H. Burkhardt and B. Pietrzyk, Recent BES measurements and the hadronic contribution to the QED vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 037502 [arXiv:1106.2991] [INSPIRE].
64. F. Jegerlehner, Electroweak effective couplings for future precision experiments, Nuovo Cim.C 034S1 (2011) 31 [arXiv:1107.4683] [INSPIRE].
65. M. Steinhauser, Leptonic contribution to the effective electromagnetic coupling constant up to three loops, Phys. Lett.B 429 (1998) 158 [hep-ph/9803313] [INSPIRE].
66. N. Cabibbo and R. Gatto, Electron positron colliding beam experiments, Phys. Rev.124 (1961) 1577 [INSPIRE].
67. S. Binner, J.H. Kuhn and K. Melnikov, Measuring σ(e+e− → hadrons) using tagged photon, Phys. Lett.B 459 (1999) 279 [hep-ph/9902399] [INSPIRE].
68. KLOE collaboration, F. Ambrosino et al., Measurement of σ(e+e− → π+π−) from threshold to 0.85 GeV2using initial state radiation with the KLOE detector, Phys. Lett.B 700 (2011) 102 [arXiv:1006.5313] [INSPIRE].
69. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Precise measurement of the e+e− → π+π−(γ) cross section with the initial state radiation method at BABAR, Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 231801 [arXiv:0908.3589] [INSPIRE].
70. CMD-2 collaboration, R.R. Akhmetshin et al., Reanalysis of hadronic cross-section measurements at CMD-2, Phys. Lett.B 578 (2004) 285 [hep-ex/0308008] [INSPIRE].
71. BES collaboration, J.Z. Bai et al., Measurement of the total cross-section for hadronic production by e+e−annihilation at energies between 2.6-5 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000) 594 [hep-ex/9908046] [INSPIRE].
72. BES collaboration, J.Z. Bai et al., Measurements of the cross-section for e+e− → hadrons at center-of-mass energies from 2 GeV to 5 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.88 (2002) 101802 [hep-ex/0102003] [INSPIRE].
73. T. Blum et al., The muon (g − 2) theory value: present and future, arXiv:1311.2198 [INSPIRE].
74. A. Pich, Review of αsdeterminations, PoS(Confinement X)022 [arXiv:1303.2262] [INSPIRE].
75. C. McNeile, C.T.H. Davies, E. Follana, K. Hornbostel and G.P. Lepage, High-precision c and b masses and QCD coupling from current-current correlators in lattice and continuum QCD, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 034512 [arXiv:1004.4285] [INSPIRE].
76. ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Higgs boson mass from the H → γγ and H →ZZ∗ →4ℓ channels with the ATLAS detector using 25fb−1of pp collision data, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 052004 [arXiv:1406.3827] [INSPIRE].
77. CMS collaboration, Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and studies of the compatibility of its couplings with the standard model, CMS-PAS-HIG-14-009, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014).
78. A.B. Arbuzov, Light pair corrections to electron positron annihilation at LEP/SLC, hep-ph/9907500 [INSPIRE].
79. A.B. Arbuzov, Higher order pair corrections to electron positron annihilation, JHEP07 (2001) 043 [INSPIRE].
80. A. Blondel, A scheme to measure the polarization asymmetry at the Z pole in LEP, Phys. Lett.B 202 (1988) 145 [Erratum ibid.208 (1988) 531] [INSPIRE].
81. T. Stelzer and W.F. Long, Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes, Comput. Phys. Commun.81 (1994) 357 [hep-ph/9401258] [INSPIRE].
82. F. Maltoni and T. Stelzer, MadEvent: automatic event generation with MadGraph, JHEP02 (2003) 027 [hep-ph/0208156] [INSPIRE].
83. J. Alwall et al., MadGraph/MadEvent v4: the new web generation, JHEP09 (2007) 028 [arXiv:0706.2334] [INSPIRE].
84. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: going beyond, JHEP06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
85. M.E. Peskin, Estimation of LHC and ILC capabilities for precision Higgs boson coupling measurements, arXiv:1312.4974 [INSPIRE].
86. D. Curtin et al., Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 075004 [arXiv:1312.4992] [INSPIRE].
87. M.E. Peskin, Comparison of LHC and ILC capabilities for Higgs boson coupling measurements, arXiv:1207.2516 [INSPIRE].
88. R. Contino, The Higgs as a composite Nambu-Goldstone boson, arXiv:1005.4269 [INSPIRE].
89. A. Azatov and J. Galloway, Electroweak symmetry breaking and the Higgs boson: confronting theories at colliders, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 28 (2013) 1330004 [arXiv:1212.1380] [INSPIRE].
90. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys.B 719 (2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089] [INSPIRE].
91. M. Drees and K. Hagiwara, Supersymmetric contribution to the electroweak ρ parameter, Phys. Rev.D 42 (1990) 1709 [INSPIRE].
92. A. Hocker, H. Lacker, S. Laplace and F. Le Diberder, A new approach to a global fit of the CKM matrix, Eur. Phys. J.C 21 (2001) 225 [hep-ph/0104062] [INSPIRE].
93. H. Flacher, M. Goebel, J. Haller, A. Hocker, K. Monig and J. Stelzer, Revisiting the global electroweak fit of the standard model and beyond with Gfitter, Eur. Phys. J.C 60 (2009) 543 [Erratum ibid.C 71 (2011) 1718] [arXiv:0811.0009] [INSPIRE].
94. R. Lafaye, T. Plehn, M. Rauch, D. Zerwas and M. Dührssen, Measuring the Higgs sector, JHEP08 (2009) 009 [arXiv:0904.3866] [INSPIRE].