Stakeholders' perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: Systematic review of the literature

European Journal of Human Genetics

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1607-1614

  Husedzinovic, Alma ^a   Ose, Dominik ^a   Schickhardt, Christoph ^a   Fröhling, Stefan ^a   Winkler, Eva C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOBANK; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONTENT ANALYSIS; ETHICS; GENOMICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; TISSUE SECTION; FACTUAL DATABASE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; META ANALYSIS;

CONFIDENTIALITY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT;

EID: 84948720885     PISSN: 10184813     EISSN: 14765438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.27     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Alexandrov LB, Stratton MR. Mutational signatures: the patterns of somatic mutations hidden in cancer genomes. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2014; 24: 52-60
2. Garraway LA, Lander ES. Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell 2013; 153: 17-37
3. Cambon-Thomsen A. Science and society-rhe social and ethical issues of postgenomic human biobanks. Nat Rev Genet 2004; 5: 866-873
4. Budimir D, Polasek O, Marusic A, et al. Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review. Croat Med J 2011; 52: 262-279
5. Rothstein MA. Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics 2005; 33: 89-101
6. Cambon-Thomsen A, Ducournau P, Gourraud PA, Pontille D. Biobanks for genomics and genomics for biobanks. Comp Funct Genom 2003; 4: 628-634
7. Hodgson SV, Popat S. Polymorphic sequence variants in medicine: a challenge and an opportunity. Clin Med 2003; 3: 260-264
8. Robertson JA. The $1000 genome: ethical and legal issues in whole genome sequencing of individuals. Am J Bioeth 2003; 3: 35-42
9. Hansson MG. Ethics and biobanks. Br J Cancer 2009; 100: 8-12
10. Hansson MG, Dillner J, Bartram CR, Carlson JA, Helgesson G. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 266-269
11. Helsinki Do. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194
12. Greely HAT: The uneasy ethical and legal underpinnings of large-scale genomic biobanks Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 2007 8 343-364
13. Heeney C, Hawkins N, de Vries J, Boddington P, Kaye J. Assessing the privacy risks of data sharing in genomics. Public Health Genom 2011; 14: 17-25
14. Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science 2013; 339: 321-324
15. Kaye J. The tension between data sharing and the protection of privacy in genomics research. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 2012; 13: 415-431
16. Wolf SM, Crock BN, Van Ness B, et al. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genet Med 2012; 14: 361-384
17. Cho MK. Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics. J Law Med Ethics 2008; 36: 208-212
18. Clayton EW. Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA. J Law Med Ethics 2008; 36: 286-291
19. Henderson GE. Is informed consent broken? Am J Med Sci 2011; 342: 267-272
20. McGuire AL, Caulfield T, Cho MK. Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nat rev Genet 2008; 9: 152-156
21. Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. J Public Health 2011; 33: 147-150
22. Helft PR, Champion VL, Eckles R, Johnson CS, Meslin EM. Cancer patients' attitudes toward future research uses of stored human biological materials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2007; 2: 15-22
23. Master Z, Claudio JO, Rachul C, Wang JCY, Minden MD, Caulfield T. Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking. BMC Med Genom 2013; 6: 8
24. Pentz RD, Billot L, Wendler D. Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patients. Am J Med Genet 2006; 140: 733-739
25. Hull SC, Sharp RR, Botkin JR, et al. Patients' views on identifiability of samples and informed consent for genetic research. Am J Bioeth 2008; 8: 62-70
26. Vermeulen E, Schmidt MK, Aaronson NK, Kuenen M, van Leeuwen FE. Obtaining fresh' consent for genetic research with biological samples archived 10 years ago. Eur J Cancer 2009b; 45: 1168-1174
27. Vermeulen E, Schmidt MK, Aaronson NK, et al. Opt-out plus, the patients' choice: preferences of cancer patients concerning information and consent regimen for future research with biological samples archived in the context of treatment. J Clin Pathol 2009a; 62: 275-278
28. Hoeyer K, Olofsson BO, Mjorndal T, Lynoe N. Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research. Scand J Public Health 2004; 32: 224-229
29. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG. Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study. Scand J Public Health 2007; 35: 148-156
30. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K. Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 2128-2134
31. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? Eur J Public Health 2006; 16: 433-440
32. Nilstun T, Hermeren G. Human tissue samples and ethics-Attitudes of the general public in Sweden to biobank research. Med Health Care Philos 2006; 9: 81-86
33. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genom 2010; 13: 368-377
34. Lee CI, Bassett LW, Leng M, et al. Patients' willingness to participate in a breast cancer biobank at screening mammogram. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 136: 899-906
35. Kerath SM, Klein G, Kern M, et al. Beliefs and attitudes towards participating in genetic research-A population based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 114
36. Lemke AA, Halverson C, Ross LF. Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Am J Med Genet 2012; 158A: 1029-1037
37. Wood F, Kowalczuk J, Elwyn G, Mitchell C, Gallacher J. Achieving online consent to participation in large-scale gene-environment studies: a tangible destination. J Med Ethics 2011; 37: 487-492
38. Kaufman DJ, Murphy-Bollinger J, Scott J, Hudson KL. Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research. Am J Hum Genet 2009; 85: 643-654
39. Haga SB, O'Daniel J. Public Perspectives Regarding Data-Sharing Practices in Genomics Research. Public Health Genom 2011; 14: 319-324
40. Trinidad SB, Fullerton SM, Bares JM, Jarvik GP, Larson EB, Burke W. Genomic research and wide data sharing: views of prospective participants. Gen Med 2010; 12: 486-495
41. McGuire AL, Hamilton JA, Lunstroth R, McCullough LB, Goldman A. DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives. Gen Med 2008; 10: 46-53
42. Kaphingst KA, Janoff JM, Harris LN, Emmons KM. Views of female breast cancer patients who donated biologic samples regarding storage and use of samples for genetic research. Clin Genet 2006; 69: 393-398
43. Tabor HK, Stock J, Brazg T, et al. Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms. Am J Med Genet 2012; 158A: 1310-1319
44. Coors ME, Raymond KM. Substance use disorder genetic research: investigators and participants grapple with the ethical issues. Psychiatr Genet 2009; 19: 83-90
45. Godard B, Ozdemir V, Fortin M, Egalite N. Ethnocultural community leaders' views and perceptions on biobanks and population specific genomic research: a qualitative research study. Public Understand Sci 2010; 19: 469-485
46. Pullman D, Etchegary H, Gallagher K, et al. Personal privacy, public benefits, and biobanks: a conjoint analysis of policy priorities and public perceptions. Gen Med 2012; 14: 229-235
47. Caulfield T, Rachul C, Nelson E. Biobanking, consent, and control: a survey of Albertans on key research ethics issues. Biopreserv Biobank 2012; 10: 433-438
48. Erwin DO, Moysich K, Kiviniemi MT, et al. Community-based partnership to identify keys to biospecimen research participation. J Cancer Educ 2013; 28: 43-51
49. McGuire AL, Oliver JM, Slashinski MJ, et al. To share or not to share: a randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research. Gen Med 2011; 13: 948-955
50. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K. Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth 2008; 8: 36-43
51. Dressler LG, Smolek S, Ponsaran R, et al. IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research. Gen Med 2012; 14: 215-222
52. Bollinger JM, Scott J, Dvoskin R, Kaufman D. Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study. Gen Med 2012; 14: 451-457
53. Meulenkamp TM, Gevers SJK, Bovenberg JA, Smets EMA: Researchers' opinions towards the communication of results of biobank research: a survey study Eur J Hum Genet 2012 20 258-262
54. Meacham MC, Starks H, Burke W, Edwards K. Researcher perspectives on disclosure of incidental findings in genetic research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2010; 5: 31-41
55. Downing NR, Williams JK, Daack-Hirsch S, Driessnack M, Simon CM. Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting. Patient Educ Counsel 2013; 90: 133-138
56. Simon CM, Williams JK, Shinkunas L, Brandt D, Daack-Hirsch S, Driessnack M. Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011; 6: 53-67
57. Meulenkamp TM, Gevers SK, Bovenberg JA, Koppelman GH, van Hylckama Vlieg A, Smets EM. Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want? Am J Med Genet 2010; 152A: 2482-2492
58. Brandt DS, Shinkunas L, Hillis SL, et al. A closer look at the recommended criteria for disclosing genetic results: perspectives of medical genetic specialists, genomic researchers, and institutional review board chairs. J Genet Counsel 2013; 22: 544-553
59. Sheehan M. Can broad consent be informed consent? Public Health Ethics 2011; 4: 226-235
60. Caulfield T. Biobanks and blanket consent: the proper place of the public good and public perception rationales. Kings Law J 2007; 18: 209-226
61. Arnason V. Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 2004; 18: 27-49
62. Erlich Y, Narayanan A. Routes for breaching and protecting genetic privacy. Nat Rev Genet 2014; 15: 409-421
63. Bredenoord AL, Kroes HY, Cuppen E, Parker M, van Delden JJM: Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered Trends Genet 2011 27 41-47
64. Clayton EW, Ross LF. Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research. JAMA 2006; 295: 37-38
65. Kaye J. Genetic research on the UK population-do new principles need to be developed? Trends Mol Med 2001; 7: 528-530