Are Revisions of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties More Like a Primary or Revision TKA?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1985-1989

  Lunebourg, Alexandre ^a   Parratte, Sébastien ^a   Ollivier, Matthieu ^a   Abdel, Matthew P ^b   Argenson, Jean Noël A ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical outcome; Primary TKA; Revision TKA; Revision UKA; Surgical characteristics; Survival rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS ASSESSMENT; HEMATOMA; HUMAN; INFECTION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS OUTCOMES SCORE; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATELLA FRACTURE; PATELLA LIGAMENT; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIMARY TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; REVISION UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; SURVIVAL RATE; TENDON RUPTURE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; KNEE; KNEE REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SURGERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84948714783     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.042     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Newman J., Pydisetty R.V., Ackroyd C. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91-B:52.
2. Lim J.W., Cousins G.R., Clift B.A., et al. Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus age and gender matched total knee arthroplasty - functional outcome and survivorship analysis. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29(9):1779.
3. Liddle A.D., Judge A., Pandit H., et al. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101 330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2014, 384(9952):1437.
4. Emerson R.H., Higgins L.L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90(1):118.
5. Berger R.A., Meneghini R.M., Jacobs J.J., et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(5):999.
6. Argenson J.N., Blanc G., Aubaniac J.M., et al. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013, 95(10):905.
7. Riddle D.L., Jiranek W.A., McGlynn F.J. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(3):408.
8. Hang J.R., Stanford T.E., Graves S.E., et al. Outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Orthop 2010, 81(1):95.
9. Lewold S., Robertsson O., Knutson K., et al. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcome in 1,135 cases from the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty study. Acta Orthop Scand 1998, 69(5):469.
10. Argenson J.N., Parratte S. The unicompartmental knee: design and technical considerations in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:137.
11. Hernigou P., Deschamps G. Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 423:161.
12. Berend K.R., George J., Lombardi A.V. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty conversion: assuring a primary outcome. Orthopedics 2009, 32(9).
13. Johnson S., Jones P., Newman J.H. The survivorship and results of total knee replacements converted from unicompartmental knee replacements. Knee 2007, 14(2):154.
14. Saldanha K.A., Keys G.W., Svard U.C., et al. Revision of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty - results of a multicentre study. Knee 2007, 14(4):275.
15. McAuley J.P., Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:279.
16. Barrett W.P., Scott R.D. Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987, 69(9):1328.
17. Lai C.H., Rand J.A. Revision of failed unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993, 287:193.
18. Levine W.N., Ozuna R.M., Scott R.D., et al. Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996, 11(7):797.
19. Padgett D.E., Stern S.H., Insall J.N. Revision total knee arthroplasty for failed unicompartmental replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991, 73(2):186.
20. Springer B.D., Scott R.D., Thornhill T.S. Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 446:214.
21. Böhm I., Landsiedl F. Revision surgery after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 35 cases. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15(8):982.
22. Châtain F., Richard A., Deschamps G., et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty after unicompartmental femorotibial prosthesis: 54 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2004, 90(1):49.
23. Sierra R.J., Kassel C.A., Wetters N.G., et al. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk!. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(Suppl. 1):128.
24. Chou D.T., Swamy G.N., Lewis J.R., et al. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee replacement to total knee replacement. Knee 2012, 19(4):356.
25. Gill T., Schemitsch E.H., Brick G.W., et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 321:10.
26. Ahlback S. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 1968, 277:7.
27. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972, 54:61.
28. Mercuriali F., Inghilleri G. Proposal of an algorithm to help the choice of the best transfusion strategy. Curr Med Res Opin 1996, 13:465.
29. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
30. Ornetti P., Parratte S., Gossec L., et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 16:423.
31. Roos E.M., Lohmander L.S. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003, 1:64.
32. Tew M., Waugh W. Estimating the survival time of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982, 64:579.
33. Peersman G., Laskin R., Davis J., et al. Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2006, 2(1):70.
34. Kaplan E.L., Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958, 53:457.
35. Scott C.E., Biant L.C. The role of the design of tibial components and stems in knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(8):1009.
36. Kerens B., Boonen B., Schotanus M.G.M., et al. Revision from unicompartmental to total knee replacement: the clinical outcome depends on reason for revision. Bone Joint J 2013, 95-B(9):1204.
37. Singh J.A., Lewallen D.G. Patient-level improvements in pain and activities of daily living after total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014, 53(2):313.