Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101330 matched patients: A study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales

The Lancet

Volumn 384, Issue 9952, 2014, Pages 1437-1445

  Liddle, Alexander D ^a   Judge, Andrew ^a,b   Pandit, Hemant ^a   Murray, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROCEDURES; PROPENSITY SCORE; REGISTER; REOPERATION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM; ARTHROPLASTY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEMIARTHROPLASTY; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATIENT READMISSION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; WALES;

EID: 84908301321     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: 1474547X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. National Joint Registry for England Wales and Northern Ireland 10th annual report, 2013 http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=jEAdoNJbxvk%3d&tabid=330&portalid=0&mid=1191 (accessed June 24, 2014).
2. S Kurtz, K Ong, E Lau, F Mowat, M Halpern Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 2007 780 785
3. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Hip and knee arthoplasty annual report, 2013 https://aoanjrr.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/documents/10180/127202/Annual%20Report%202013?version=1.2&t=1385685288617 (accessed June 24, 2014).
4. The New Zealand Joint Registry Thirteen Year Report, 2012 http://nzoa.org.nz/system/files/NJR%2013%20Year%20Report.pdf (accessed June 24, 2014).
5. V Wylde, AW Blom The failure of survivorship J Bone Joint Surg Br 93 2011 569 570
6. JA Singh, DG Lewallen Ninety-day mortality in patients undergoing elective total hip or total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 27 2012 1417 1422
7. B Zmistowski, C Restrepo, LK Kahl, J Parvizi, PF Sharkey Incidence and reasons for nonrevision reoperation after total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 2011 138 145
8. NHS Information Centre Hospital Episode Statistics: finalised patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) in England: April 2010-March 2011 https://catalogue.ic.nhs.uk/publications/hospital/proms/proms-eng-apr-10-mar-11-final/fina-prom-eng-apr-10-mar-11-pre-post-rep1.pdf 2012 (accessed June 24, 2014).
9. CE Scott, CR Howie, D MacDonald, LC Biant Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 2010 1253 1258
10. CA Willis-Owen, K Brust, H Alsop, M Miraldo, JP Cobb Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy Knee 16 2009 473 478
11. S Arno, D Maffei, PS Walker, R Schwarzkopf, P Desai, GC Steiner Retrospective analysis of total knee arthroplasty cases for visual, histological, and clinical eligibility of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties J Arthroplasty 26 2011 1396 1403
12. NM Brown, NP Sheth, K Davis et al. Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis J Arthroplasty 27 suppl 2012 86 90
13. M Noble, G Wright, C Dibben et al. Indices of Deprivation 2004: report to the office of the Deputy Prime Minister 2004 Neighbourbood Renewal Unit London
14. ME Charlson, P Pompei, KL Ales, CR MacKenzie A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation J Chronic Dis 40 1987 373 383
15. M Saklad Grading of patients for surgical procedures Anesthesiology 2 1941 281 284
16. IJ Dahabreh, RC Sheldrick, JK Paulus et al. Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes Eur Heart J 33 2012 1893 1901
17. JP Fine, RJ Gray A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk J Am Stat Assoc 94 1999 496 509
18. DG Altman, PK Andersen Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an event BMJ 319 1999 1492 1495
19. AG Rothwell, GJ Hooper, A Hobbs, CM Frampton An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry J Bone Joint Surg Br 92 2010 413 418
20. J Newman, RV Pydisetty, C Ackroyd Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial J Bone Joint Surg Br 91 2009 52 57
21. P Baker, S Jameson, R Critchley, M Reed, P Gregg, D Deehan Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements J Bone Joint Surg Am 95 2013 702 709
22. PF Sun, YH Jia Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized prospective study Knee 19 2012 103 106
23. MC Lyons, SJ MacDonald, LE Somerville, DD Naudie, RW McCalden Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470 2012 84 90
24. AK Amin, JT Patton, RE Cook, M Gaston, IJ Brenkel Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: Results from a matched study Clin Orthop Relat Res 451 2006 101 106
25. A Manzotti, N Confalonieri, C Pullen Unicompartmental versus computer-assisted total knee replacement for medial compartment knee arthritis: a matched paired study Int Orthop 31 2007 315 319
26. AV Lombardi Jr, KR Berend, CA Walter, J Aziz-Jacobo, NA Cheney Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 467 2009 1450 1457
27. CR Costa, AJ Johnson, MA Mont, PM Bonutti Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in the same patient J Knee Surg 24 2011 273 278
28. National Joint Registry for England and Wales The 7th Annual Report, 2010 http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Portals/0/NJR%207th%20Annual%20Report%202010.pdf (accessed June 24, 2014).
29. KY Yang, MC Wang, SJ Yeo, NN Lo Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty - early results of a matched-pair comparison Singapore Med J 44 2003 559 562
30. TT Niinimäki, DW Murray, J Partanen, A Pajala, JI Leppilahti Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties implanted for osteoarthritis with partial loss of joint space have high re-operation rates Knee 18 2011 432 435
31. LP Hunt, Y Ben-Shlomo, EM Clark et al. 45-day mortality after 467779 knee replacements for osteoarthritis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: an observational study Lancet 2014 published online July 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60540-7
32. MJ Morris, RG Molli, KR Berend, AV Lombardi Jr Mortality and perioperative complications after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Knee 20 2013 218 220
33. J Pearl Understanding Propensity Scores. Causality 2nd ed. 2009 Cambridge University Press New York 348 352
34. PR Rosenbaum, DB Rubin The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects Biometrika 70 1983 41 55
35. N Freemantle, L Marston, K Walters, J Wood, MR Reynolds, I Petersen Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research BMJ 347 2013 f6409
36. LP Hunt, Y Ben-Shlomo, EM Clark the National Joint Registry for England Wales and Northern Ireland 90-day mortality after 409,096 total hip replacements for osteoarthritis, from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: a retrospective analysis Lancet 382 2013 1097 1104
37. P Aylin, R Alexandrescu, MH Jen, EK Mayer, A Bottle Day of week of procedure and 30 day mortality for elective surgery: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics BMJ 346 2013 f2424
38. D Beard, A Price, J Cook et al. Total or partial knee arthroplasty trial-TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Trials 14 2013 292