Gene-environment interaction of genome-wide association study-identified susceptibility loci and meat-cooking mutagens in the etiology of renal cell carcinoma

Cancer

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 108-115

  Melkonian, Stephanie C ^a   Daniel, Carrie R ^a   Ye, Yuanqing ^a   Tannir, Nizar M ^a   Karam, Jose A ^a   Matin, Surena F ^a   Wood, Christopher G ^a   Wu, Xifeng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

gene environment interaction; heterocyclic amines; meat cooking mutagens; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; renal cell carcinoma

Indexed keywords

2 AMINO 1 METHYL 6 PHENYLIMIDAZO[4,5 B]PYRIDINE; 2 AMINO 3,8 DIMETHYLIMIDAZO[4,5 F]QUINOXALINE; INOSITOL 1,4,5 TRISPHOSPHATE RECEPTOR; MEAT COOKING MUTAGEN; MUTAGENIC AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; 2-AMINO-1-METHYL-6-PHENYLIMIDAZO(4,5-B)PYRIDINE; 2-AMINO-3,8-DIMETHYLIMIDAZO(4,5-F)QUINOXALINE; IMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; QUINOXALINE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPAS1 GENE; FEMALE; GENE; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC RISK; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HUMAN; ITPR2 GENE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RED MEAT; WHITE MEAT; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHEMICALLY INDUCED; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTOR; UNITED STATES;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; FEMALE; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; IMIDAZOLES; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MEAT; MIDDLE AGED; MUTAGENS; QUINOXALINES; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84947969621     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29543     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Daniel CR, Cross AJ, Graubard BI, et al., Large prospective investigation of meat intake, related mutagens, and risk of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 95: 155-162.
2. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007.
3. Faramawi MF, Johnson E, Fry MW, Sall M, Zhou Y,. Consumption of different types of meat and the risk of renal cancer: meta-analysis of case-control studies. Cancer Causes Control. 2007; 18: 125-133.
4. Alexander DD, Cushing CA,. Quantitative assessment of red meat or processed meat consumption and kidney cancer. Cancer Detect Prev. 2009; 32: 340-351.
5. Lee JE, Spiegelman D, Hunter DJ, et al., Fat, protein, and meat consumption and renal cell cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 13 prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 1695-1706.
6. Daniel CR, Schwartz KL, Colt JS, et al., Meat-cooking mutagens and risk of renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2011; 105: 1096-1104.
7. Kluwe WM, Hook JB,. Effects of environmental chemicals on kidney metabolism and function. Kidney Int. 1980; 18: 648-655.
8. Radford R, Frain H, Ryan MP, Slattery C, McMorrow T,. Mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis in the kidneys. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14: 19416-19433.
9. Linehan WM, Ricketts CJ,. The metabolic basis of kidney cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013; 23: 46-55.
10. Melkonian SC, Daniel CR, Hildebrandt MA, et al., Joint association of genome-wide association study-identified susceptibility loci and dietary patterns in risk of renal cell carcinoma among non-Hispanic whites. Am J Epidemiol. 2014; 180: 499-507.
11. Clague J, Lin J, Cassidy A, et al., Family history and risk of renal cell carcinoma: results from a case-control study and systematic meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 801-807.
12. Olson SH, Kelsey JL, Pearson TA, Levin B,. Evaluation of random digit dialing as a method of control selection in case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1992; 135: 210-222.
13. Brown CC, Kipnis V, Freedman LS, Hartman AM, Schatzkin A, Wacholder S,. Energy adjustment methods for nutritional epidemiology: the effect of categorization. Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 139: 323-338.
14. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, et al., Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32 (suppl 9): S498-S504.
15. Block G, Coyle LM, Hartman AM, Scoppa SM,. Revision of dietary analysis software for the Health Habits and History Questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 139: 1190-1196.
16. Block G, Thompson FE, Hartman AM, Larkin FA, Guire KE,. Comparison of two dietary questionnaires validated against multiple dietary records collected during a 1-year period. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992; 92: 686-693.
17. Food Surveys Research Group, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture. USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies, 4.1 Beltsville, MD: Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group; 2010.
18. Kazerouni N, Sinha R, Hsu CH, Greenberg A, Rothman N,. Analysis of 200 food items for benzo[a]pyrene and estimation of its intake in an epidemiologic study. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001; 39: 423-436.
19. Sinha R, Cross A, Curtin J, et al., Development of a food frequency questionnaire module and databases for compounds in cooked and processed meats. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2005; 49: 648-655.
20. Henrion M, Frampton M, Scelo G, et al., Common variation at 2q22.3 (ZEB2) influences the risk of renal cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2013; 22: 825-831.
21. Purdue MP, Johansson M, Zelenika D, et al., Genome-wide association study of renal cell carcinoma identifies two susceptibility loci on 2p21 and 11q13.3. Nat Genet. 2011; 43: 60-65.
22. Wu X, Scelo G, Purdue MP, et al., A genome-wide association study identifies a novel susceptibility locus for renal cell carcinoma on 12p11.23. Hum Mol Genet. 2012; 21: 456-462.
23. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S,. Confidence interval estimation of interaction. Epidemiology. 1992; 3: 452-456.
24. Knol MJ, van der Tweel I, Grobbee DE, Numans ME, Geerlings MI,. Estimating interaction on an additive scale between continuous determinants in a logistic regression model. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 36: 1111-1118.
25. Hu FB,. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002; 13: 3-9.
26. Lindblad P, Wolk A, Bergstrom R, Adami HO,. Diet and risk of renal cell cancer: a population-based case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997; 6: 215-223.
27. Lee JE, Mannisto S, Spiegelman D, et al., Intakes of fruit, vegetables, and carotenoids and renal cell cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 13 prospective studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 1730-1739.
28. Zheng W, Lee SA,. Well-done meat intake, heterocyclic amine exposure, and cancer risk. Nutr Cancer. 2009; 61: 437-446.
29. Dellavalle CT, Daniel CR, Aschebrook-Kilfoy B, et al., Dietary intake of nitrate and nitrite and risk of renal cell carcinoma in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108: 205-212.
30. Fung TT, Schulze M, Manson JE, Willett WC, Hu FB,. Dietary patterns, meat intake, and the risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164: 2235-2240.
31. Azimi I, Roberts-Thomson SJ, Monteith GR,. Calcium influx pathways in breast cancer: opportunities for pharmacological intervention. Br J Pharmacol. 2014; 171: 945-960.
32. Munaron L, Antoniotti S, Fiorio Pla A, Lovisolo D,. Blocking Ca2+entry: a way to control cell proliferation. Curr Med Chem. 2004; 11: 1533-1543.
33. Wang H, Yamamoto JF, Caberto C, et al., Genetic variation in the bioactivation pathway for polycyclic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic amines in relation to risk of colorectal neoplasia. Carcinogenesis. 2011; 32: 203-209.