An integrated multicriteria decision making methodology using compromise solution methods for prioritising risk of marine machinery systems

Ocean Engineering

Volumn 105, Issue , 2015, Pages 92-103

  Emovon, Ikuobase ^a,b   Norman, Rosemary A ^a   Murphy, Alan J ^a   Pazouki, Kayvan ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM RESOURCES   (Nigeria)

Author keywords

Compromise Programming; Failure modes; FMEA; Marine machinery system; Risk criteria; VIKOR

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FAILURE MODES; MACHINERY; MARINE ENGINEERING; RISKS;

COMPROMISE PROGRAMMING; FMEA; MACHINERY SYSTEMS; RISK CRITERIA; VIKOR;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; LINEAR PROGRAMING; MACHINERY; METHODOLOGY; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; RANKING;

EID: 84947969328     PISSN: 00298018     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. A. Aghajani Bazzazi, M. Osanloo, and B. Karimi Deriving preference order of open pit mines equipment through MADM methods: application of modified VIKOR method Expert Syst. Appl. 38 3 2011 2550 2556
2. M. Aleksić, and P. Stanojević Reliability centred maintenance RCM - Održavanje prema pouzdanosti 5 15 2007 41 45
3. America Bureau of Shipping, 2004. Guidance note on Reliability-Centered Maintence. America Bureau of Shipping.
4. L. Anojkumar, M. Ilangkumaran, and V. Sasirekha Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry Expert Syst. Appl. 41 6 2014 2964 2980
5. Ayadi, D., Azzabi, L., Kobi, A., Bachar, K., Robledo, C., 2013. A multicriteria failure mode and effects analysis approach for optimizing human safety. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS). Orlando FL, pp. 1-9.
6. A. Bejger An analysis of chosen engine failures of the "Seismic Research" type ship J. Pol. CIMAC 6 2 2011 9 14
7. A. Bilbao-Terol, B. Pérez-Gladish, and J. Antomil-lbias Selecting the optimum portfolio using fuzzy compromise programming and Sharpes single-index model Appl. Math. Comput. 182 1 2006 644 664
8. M. Braglia MAFMA: multi-attribute failure mode analysis Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 17 9 2000 1017 1034
9. M. Braglia, M. Frosolini, and R. Montanari Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 19 5 2003 425 443
10. H. Çalişkan, B. Kurşuncu, C. Kurbanoglu, and T.Y. Güven Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods Mater. Des. 45 2013 473 479
11. G. Carmignani An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: the priority-cost FMECA Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94 4 2009 861 871
12. G. Carpinelli, P. Caramia, F. Mottola, and D. Proto Exponential weighted method and a compromise programming method for multi-objective operation of plug-in vehicle aggregators in microgrids Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 56 0 2014 374 384
13. P. Chatterjee, V.M. Athawale, and S. Chakraborty Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods Mater. Des. 30 10 2009 4043 4053
14. K.-S. Chin, Y.-M. Wang, G. Ka Kwai Poon, and J.-B. Yang Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach Comput. Oper. Res. 36 6 2009 1768 1779
15. K.S. Chin, Y.M. Wang, G.K.K. Poon, and J.B. Yang Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis Decis. Support Syst. 48 1 2009 246 256
16. M.-T. Chu, J. Shyu, G.-H. Tzeng, and R. Khosla Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis Expert Syst. Appl. 33 4 2007 1011 1024
17. K. Cicek, and M. Celik Application of failure modes and effects analysis to main engine crankcase explosion failure on-board ship Saf. Sci. 51 1 2013 6 10
18. K. Cicek, H.H. Turan, Y.I. Topcu, and M.N. Searslan Risk-based preventive maintenance planning using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) for marine engine systems Proceedings of the 2010 Second International Conference on Engineering Systems Management and its Applications (ICESMA) 2010 IEEE Sharhaj, United Arab Emirates 1 6
19. Conachey, R.M., 2004. Developemnt of RCM Requirements for the Marine Industry, 2nd International ASRANet Colloquiiiium, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 69-80.
20. Conachey, R.M., 2005. Development of machinery survey requirement based on Reliability-Centerd maintenance, ABS Technical Papers.
21. Conachey, R.M., Montgomery, R.L., 2003. Application of Reliabilty-centered Maintenance Techniques to the Marine Industry, ABS Technical Papers.
22. J. Crocker, and U.D. Kumar Age-related maintenance versus reliability centred maintenance: a case study on aero-engines Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 67 2 2000 113 118
23. H. Deng Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison Int. J. Approx. Reason. 21 3 1999 215 231
24. L. Diaz-Balteiro, R. Voces González, and C. Romero Making sustainability rankings using compromise programming. An application to European paper industry Silva Fenn. 45 4 2011 761 773
25. Dunford, C., 2011. Crankshaft purpose, design and modes of failure, CSL Technical focus. London, United Kingdom, pp. 1-5.
26. Emovon, I., Norman, R.A., Murphy, A.J., 2014. A new Tool for Prioritising the Risk of Failure Modes for Marine Machinery Systems In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering OMAE14. Americal Society of Mechanical Engineers, California United States.
27. Ford Motor Company, 1998. Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, Instruction manual.
28. C.H. Hsu, F.-K. Wang, and G.-H. Tzeng The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 66 0 2012 95 111
29. M. Ilangkumaran, and S. Kumanan Selection of maintenance policy for textile industry using hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 20 7 2009 1009 1022
30. A. Jahan, M.Y. Ismail, F. Mustapha, and S.M. Sapuan Material selection based on ordinal data Mater. Des. 31 7 2010 3180 3187
31. D.-H. Jee, and K.-J. Kang A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory Mater. Des. 21 3 2000 199 206
32. A.C. Kutlu, and M. Ekmekçioʇlu Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP Expert Syst. Appl. 39 1 2012 61 67
33. H.-C. Liu, L.-X. Mao, Z.-Y. Zhang, and P. Li Induced aggregation operators in the VIKOR method and its application in material selection Appl. Math. Model. 37 9 2013 6325 6338
34. H.C. Liu, L. Liu, Q.H. Bian, Q.L. Lin, N. Dong, and P.C. Xu Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory Expert Syst. Appl. 38 4 2011 4403 4415
35. C. Macharis, J. Springael, K. De Brucker, and A. Verbeke PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP Eur. J. Oper. Res. 153 2 2004 307 317
36. K. Maheswaran, and T. Loganathan A novel approach for prioritisation of failure modes in FMEA using MCDM Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 3 4 2013 733 739
37. R.T. Marler, and J.S. Arora Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 26 6 2004 369 395
38. A.J. Mokashi, J. Wang, and A.K. Vermar A study of reliability-centred maintenance in maritime operations Mar. Policy 26 5 2002 325 335
39. Moreira, M.P., Dupont, C.J., Vellasco, M.M.B.R., 2009. PROMETHEE and fuzzy PROMETHEE multicriteria methods for ranking equipment failure modes. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intelligent System Applications to Power Systems, 2009. ISAP09. IEEE, pp. 1-6.
40. Nirmal, P., 2013. A comparative Analysis of TOPSIS and VIKOR Methods in the Selection of Industrial Robots, Mechanical Engineering. National Institute of Technology.
41. Opricovic, S., 1998. Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
42. S. Opricovic, and G.H. Tzeng Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156 2 2004 445 455
43. M.-H. Phua, and M. Minowa A GIS-based multi-criteria decision making approach to forest conservation planning at a landscape scale: a case study in the Kinabalu Area, Sabah, Malaysia Landsc. Urban Plan. 71 2-4 2005 207 222
44. A. Pillay, and J. Wang Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 79 1 2003 69 85
45. R.V. Rao Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environmment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods 2007 Springer-Verlag London
46. R.V. Rao A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method Mater. Des. 29 10 2008 1949 1954
47. R.V. Rao, and B.K. Patel A subjective and objective integrated multiple attribute decision making method for material selection Mater. Des. 31 10 2010 4738 4747
48. Sachdeva, A., Kumar, P., Kumar, D., 2009. Maintenance criticality analysis using TOPSIS. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Hong Kong, pp. 199-203.
49. N.R. Sankar, and B.S. Prabhu Modified approach for the prioritisation of failures in a system failure mode and effect analysis Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 18 3 2000 324 335
50. M.K. Sayadi, M. Heydari, and K. Shahanaghi Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers Appl. Math. Model. 33 5 2009 2257 2262
51. A. Scipioni, G. Saccarola, A. Centazzo, and F. Arena FMEA methodology design, implementation and integration with HACCP system in a food company Food Control 13 8 2002 495 501
52. S.M. Seyed-Hosseini, N. Safaei, and M.J. Asgharpour Reprioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis by decision making trial and evaluation laboratory technique Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 91 8 2006 872 881
53. G. Shafer Mathematical Theory Of Evidence 1976 Princeton University Princeton, NJ
54. M. Shaghaghi, and K. Rezaie Failure mode and effects analysis using generalized mixture operators J. Optim. Ind. Eng. 11 2012 1 10
55. A. Shanian, and O. Savadogo TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell J. Power Sources 159 2 2006 1095 1104
56. Stamatis, D.H., 2003. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Asq Press.
57. X. Su, Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, and Q. Bao An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades Eng. Fail. Anal. 26 0 2012 164 174
58. D.N. Tiwari, R. Loof, and G.N. Paudyal Environmental-economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques Agric. Syst. 60 2 1999 99 112
59. B. Vahdani, H. Hadipour, J.S. Sadaghiani, and M. Amiri Extension of VIKOR method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 47 9-12 2010 1231 1239
60. L.-A. Vidal, F. Marle, and J.-C. Bocquet Using a Delphi process and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects Expert Syst. Appl. 38 5 2011 5388 5405
61. K. Xu, L.C. Tang, M. Xie, S.L. Ho, and M.L. Zhu Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 75 1 2002 17 29
62. J. Yang, H.-Z. Huang, L.-P. He, S.-P. Zhu, and D. Wen Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty Eng. Fail. Anal. 18 8 2011 2084 2092
63. Zeleny, M., 1982. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill.