A new tool for prioritising the risk of failure modes for marine machinery systems

Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE

Volumn 4A, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Emovon, Ikuobase ^a   Norman, Rosemary A ^a   Murphy, Alan J ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Failure mode; FMEA; Risk criteria; Risk Priority Number (RPN); TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

FAILURE MODES; MACHINERY; MARINE ENGINEERING; RISK ASSESSMENT;

AVERAGING TECHNIQUE; DEMPSTER SHAFER EVIDENCE THEORY; FMEA; MACHINERY SYSTEMS; RISK CRITERIA; RISK OF FAILURE; RISK PRIORITY NUMBER; TOPSIS;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 84910656848     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2014-23267     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Pillay, A., and Wang, J., 2003, "Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 79(1), pp. 69-85.
2. Zhang, Z., and Chu, X., 2011, "Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty," Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), pp. 206-214.
3. Yang, J., Huang, H.-Z., He, L.-P., Zhu, S.-P., and Wen, D., 2011, "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty," Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(8), pp. 2084-2092.
4. Su, X., Deng, Y., Mahadevan, S., and Bao, Q., 2012, "An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades," Engineering Failure Analysis, 26(0), pp. 164-174.
5. Braglia, M., 2000, "MAFMA: Multi-attribute failure mode analysis," International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 17(9), pp. 1017-1034.
6. Sachdeva, A., Kumar, P., and Kumar, D., 2009, "Maintenance criticality analysis using TOPSIS," Proc. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 199-203.
7. Zammori, F., and Gabbrielli, R., 2012, "ANP/RPN: A multi criteria evaluation of the risk priority number," Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 28(1), pp. 85-104.
8. Liu, H. C, Liu, L., and Bian, Q. H., Lin, Q. L., Dong, N., and Xu, P. C, 2011, "Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory," Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), pp. 4403-4415.
9. Kutlu, A. C, and Ekmekçioʇlu, M., 2012, "Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP," Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), pp. 61-67.
10. Liu, H. C, Liu, L., Liu, N., and Mao, L. X., 2012, "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment," Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), pp. 12926-12934.
11. Sharma, R. K., and Sharma, P., 2012, "Integrated framework to optimize RAM and cost decisions in a process plant," Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25(6), pp. 883-904.
12. Sachdeva, A., Kumar, D., and Kumar, P., 2009, "Multi-factor mode criticality analysis using TOPSIS," Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 5(8), p. 9.
13. Maheswaran, K, and Loganathan, T., 2013, "A Novel Approach for Prioritisation of Failure modes in FMEA using MCDM," International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 3(4), pp. 733-739.
14. Chin, K. S., and Wang, Y. M., Poon, G. K. K., and Yang, J. B., 2009, "Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis," Decision Support Systems, 48(1), pp. 246-256.
15. Cicek, K, and Celik, M., 2013, "Application of failure modes and effects analysis to main engine crankcase explosion failure on-board ship," Safety Science, 51(1), pp. 6-10.
16. Chin, K.-S., Wang, Y.-M., Ka Kwai Poon, G., and Yang, J.-B., 2009, "Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach," Computers & Operations Research, 36(6), pp. 1768-1779.
17. Shafer, G, 1976, "Mathematical theory of evidence.," Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
18. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K, 1981, "Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications.," Springer-Verlag, Newyork.
19. Yoon, K, Hwang, C. L., 1995, "Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction.," SAGE, California.
20. Çalişkan, H., Kurşuncu, B., Kurbanoglu, C, and Güven, T. Y., 2013, "Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods," Materials and Design, 45, pp. 473-479.
21. Ölçer, A. I., and Odabaşi, A Y., 2005, "A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research 166(1 SPEC. ISS.), pp. 93-114.
22. Chu, M. T., Shyu, J., Tzeng, G H., and Khosla, R, 2007, "Comparison among three analytical methods for knowledge communities group-decision analysis," Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), pp. 1011-1024.
23. Liou, J. J. H, and Chuang, Y. T., 2010, "Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for selection of outsourcing providers," Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), pp. 3755-3761.
24. Cicek, K, Turan, H. H, Topcu, Y. I., Searslan, M. N., "Risk-based preventive maintenance planning using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) for marine engine systems."
25. America Bureau of Shipping, 2004, "Guidance note on Reliability-Centered Maintence," America Bureau of Shipping.
26. Bejger, A., 2011, "An analysis of chosen engine failures of the "Seismic Research" type ship," Journal of Polish CIMAC, 6(2), pp. 9-14.
27. Dunford, C, 2011, "Crankshaft purpose, design and modes of failure," CSL Technical focusLondon United Kingdom, pp. 1-5.
28. Mokashi, A. J., Wang, J., and Vermar, A. K, 2002, "A study of reliability-centred maintenance in maritime operations," Marine Policy, 26(5), pp. 325-335.