Microcirculation-on-a-chip: A microfluidic platform for assaying blood-and lymphatic-vessel permeability

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Sato, Miwa ^a   Sasaki, Naoki ^a,e   Ato, Manabu ^b   Hirakawa, Satoshi ^c   Sato, Kiichi ^d   Sato, Kae ^a  

^a JAPAN WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES   (Japan)

^c HAMAMATSU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d GUNMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e TOYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLAUDIN 5; HISTAMINE; SNAKE VENOM; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL CADHERIN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL INJURY; BLOOD VESSEL PERMEABILITY; CAPILLARY ENDOTHELIAL CELL; CELL FUNCTION; CELL JUNCTION; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LYMPH VESSEL ENDOTHELIUM; LYMPHATIC VESSEL PERMEABILITY; MAMMAL; MEDICAL DEVICE; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MICROCIRCULATION; MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE; MICROFLUIDICS; POROSITY; TIGHT JUNCTION; VENULE; ANIMAL; BOVINE; CAPILLARY PERMEABILITY; CELL CULTURE; CYTOLOGY; LAB ON A CHIP; LYMPH VESSEL; PHYSIOLOGY; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIUM;

ANIMALS; CAPILLARY PERMEABILITY; CATTLE; CELLS, CULTURED; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; ENDOTHELIUM, VASCULAR; HISTAMINE; HUMANS; LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES; LYMPHATIC VESSELS; MICROCIRCULATION;

EID: 84947803121     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137301     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Granger DN, Senchenkova E. Inflammation and the Microcirculation. San Rafael (CA): Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences; 2010. 2010.
2. Saito Y, Nakagami H, Kaneda Y, Morishita R. Lymphedema and therapeutic lymphangiogenesis. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013:804675. Epub 2013/11/14. doi: 10.1155/2013/804675 PMID: 24222916; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3810055.
3. Kano MR, Komuta Y, Iwata C, Oka M, Shirai YT, Morishita Y, et al. Comparison of the effects of the kinase inhibitors imatinib, sorafenib, and transforming growth factor-beta receptor inhibitor on extravasation of nanoparticles from neovasculature. Cancer Sci. 2009; 100(1):173-80. Epub 2008/11/29. doi: CAS1003. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.01003.x PMID: 19037999.
4. Dixon JB, Greiner ST, Gashev AA, Cote GL, Moore JE, Zawieja DC. Lymph flow, shear stress, and lymphocyte velocity in rat mesenteric prenodal lymphatics. Microcirculation. 2006; 13(7):597-610. Epub 2006/09/23. doi: V161W84779223V7Q. doi: 10.1080/10739680600893909 PMID: 16990218.
5. Ono N, Mizuno R, Ohhashi T. Effective permeability of hydrophilic substances through walls of lymph vessels: roles of endothelial barrier. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 289(4):H1676-82. Epub 2005/06/21. doi: 01084.2004. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01084.2004 PMID: 15964919.
6. Saria A, Lundberg JM, Skofitsch G, Lembeck F. Vascular protein linkage in various tissue induced by substance P, capsaicin, bradykinin, serotonin, histamine and by antigen challenge. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1983; 324(3):212-8. Epub 1983/11/01. PMID: 6197659.
7. Laschke MW, Vollmar B, Menger MD. The dorsal skinfold chamber: window into the dynamic interaction of biomaterials with their surrounding host tissue. Eur Cell Mater. 2011; 22:147-64; discussion 64-7. Epub 2011/09/21. doi: vol022a12. PMID: 21932192.
8. Daly SM, Leahy MJ. 'Go with the flow ': a review of methods and advancements in blood flow imaging. J Biophotonics. 2013; 6(3):217-55. Epub 2012/06/20. doi: 10.1002/jbio.201200071 PMID: 22711377.
9. Tsuji T, Sasaki Y, Tanaka M, Hanabata N, Hada R, Munakata A. Microvessel morphology and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human colonic carcinoma with or without metastasis. Lab Invest. 2002; 82(5):555-62. Epub 2002/05/11. PMID: 12003996.
10. Margaris KN, Black RA. Modelling the lymphatic system: challenges and opportunities. J R Soc Interface. 2012; 9(69):601-12. Epub 2012/01/13. doi: rsif.2011.0751. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0751 PMID: 22237677; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3284143.
11. Kawai Y, Yokoyama Y, Kaidoh M, Ohhashi T. Shear stress-induced ATP-mediated endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase expression in human lymphatic endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2010; 298(3):C647-55. Epub 2010/01/01. doi: ajpcell.00249.2009. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00249.2009 PMID: 20042732.
12. Breslin JW, Kurtz KM. Lymphatic endothelial cells adapt their barrier function in response to changes in shear stress. Lymphat Res Biol. 2009; 7(4):229-37. Epub 2010/02/11. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2009.0015 PMID: 20143922; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2883493.
13. Reed AL, Rowson SA, Dixon JB. Demonstration of ATP-dependent, transcellular transport of lipid across the lymphatic endothelium using an in vitro model of the lacteal. Pharm Res. 2013; 30 (12):3271-80. Epub 2013/11/21. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1218-x PMID: 24254195; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3849718.
14. Farmer PJ, Bernier SG, Lepage A, Guillemette G, Regoli D, Sirois P. Permeability of endothelial monolayers to albumin is increased by bradykinin and inhibited by prostaglandins. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001; 280(4):L732-8. Epub 2001/03/10. PMID: 11238014.
15. Guo M, Breslin JW, Wu MH, Gottardi CJ, Yuan SY. VE-cadherin and beta-catenin binding dynamics during histamine-induced endothelial hyperpermeability. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008; 294(4): C977-84. Epub 2008/02/22. doi: ajpcell.90607.2007. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.90607.2007 PMID: 18287330; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4128490.
16. van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Draijer R, Vermeer MA, van Hinsbergh VW. Transient and prolonged increase in endothelial permeability induced by histamine and thrombin: role of protein kinases, calcium, and RhoA. Circ Res. 1998; 83(11):1115-23. Epub 1998/12/01. PMID: 9831706.
17. Tanaka Y, Kikukawa Y, Sato K, Sugii Y, Kitamori T. Culture and leukocyte adhesion assay of human arterial endothelial cells in a glass microchip. Anal Sci. 2007; 23(3):261-6. Epub 2007/03/21. doi: JST. JSTAGE/analsci/23.261 PMID: 17372365.
18. Sasaki N, Shinjo M, Hirakawa S, Nishinaka M, Tanaka Y, Mawatari K, et al. A palmtop-sized microfluidic cell culture system driven by a miniaturized infusion pump. Electrophoresis. 2012; 33(12):1729-35. Epub 2012/06/29. doi: 10.1002/elps.201100691 PMID: 22740461.
19. Chrobak KM, Potter DR, Tien J. Formation of perfused, functional microvascular tubes in vitro. Microvasc Res. 2006; 71(3):185-96. Epub 2006/04/08. doi: S0026-2862(06)00021-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr. 2006.02.005 PMID: 16600313.
20. Young EW, Watson MW, Srigunapalan S, Wheeler AR, Simmons CA. Technique for real-time measurements of endothelial permeability in a microfluidic membrane chip using laser-induced fluorescence detection. Anal Chem. 2010; 82(3):808-16. Epub 2010/01/07. doi: 10.1021/ac901560w PMID: 20050596.
21. Shao J, Wu L, Wu J, Zheng Y, Zhao H, Lou X, et al. A microfluidic chip for permeability assays of endothelial monolayer. Biomed Microdevices. 2010; 12(1):81-8. Epub 2009/10/06. doi: 10.1007/s10544- 009-9362-0 PMID: 19802699.
22. Song JW, Cavnar SP, Walker AC, Luker KE, Gupta M, Tung YC, et al. Microfluidic endothelium for studying the intravascular adhesion of metastatic breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2009; 4(6):e5756. Epub 2009/06/02. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005756 PMID: 19484126; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2684591.
23. Srigunapalan S, Lam C, Wheeler AR, Simmons CA. A microfluidic membrane device to mimic critical components of the vascular microenvironment. Biomicrofluidics. 2011; 5(1):13409. Epub 2011/04/28. doi: 10.1063/1.3530598 PMID: 21522499; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3082346.
24. Chen MB, Srigunapalan S, Wheeler AR, Simmons CA. A 3D microfluidic platform incorporating methacrylated gelatin hydrogels to study physiological cardiovascular cell-cell interactions. Lab Chip. 2013; 13(13):2591-8. Epub 2013/03/26. doi: 10.1039/c3lc00051f PMID: 23525275.
25. Wong KH, Truslow JG, Khankhel AH, Chan KL, Tien J. Artificial lymphatic drainage systems for vascularized microfluidic scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013; 101(8):2181-90. Epub 2013/01/03. doi: 10. 1002/jbm.a.34524 PMID: 23281125; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3620968.
26. Song JW, Munn LL. Fluid forces control endothelial sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108 (37):15342-7. Epub 2011/08/31. doi: 1105316108. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105316108 PMID: 21876168; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3174629.
27. Yeon JH, Ryu HR, Chung M, Hu QP, Jeon NL. In vitro formation and characterization of a perfusable three-dimensional tubular capillary network in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip. 2012; 12(16):2815-22. Epub 2012/07/07. doi: 10.1039/c2lc40131b PMID: 22767334.
28. Kim S, Lee H, Chung M, Jeon NL. Engineering of functional, perfusable 3D microvascular networks on a chip. Lab Chip. 2013; 13(8):1489-500. Epub 2013/02/27. doi: 10.1039/c3lc41320a PMID: 23440068.
29. Booth R, Kim H. Characterization of a microfluidic in vitro model of the blood-brain barrier (muBBB). Lab Chip. 2012; 12(10):1784-92. Epub 2012/03/17. doi: 10.1039/c2lc40094d PMID: 22422217.
30. Griep LM, Wolbers F, de Wagenaar B, ter Braak PM, Weksler BB, Romero IA, et al. BBB on chip: microfluidic platform to mechanically and biochemically modulate blood-brain barrier function. Biomed Microdevices. 2013; 15(1):145-50. Epub 2012/09/08. doi: 10.1007/s10544-012-9699-7 PMID: 22955726.
31. Prabhakarpandian B, Shen MC, Nichols JB, Mills IR, Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz M, Aschner M, et al. SyMBBB: a microfluidic Blood Brain Barrier model. Lab Chip. 2013; 13(6):1093-101. Epub 2013/01/25. doi: 10.1039/c2lc41208j PMID: 23344641; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3613157.
32. Price GM, Chrobak KM, Tien J. Effect of cyclic AMP on barrier function of human lymphatic microvascular tubes. Microvasc Res. 2008; 76(1):46-51. Epub 2008/04/29. doi: S0026-2862(08)00027-7. doi: 10. 1016/j.mvr.2008.02.003 PMID: 18440562; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2574545.
33. Chan KL, Khankhel AH, Thompson RL, Coisman BJ, Wong KH, Truslow JG, et al. Crosslinking of collagen scaffolds promotes blood and lymphatic vascular stability. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014; 102 (9):3186-95. Epub 2013/10/24. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34990 PMID: 24151175; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3995898.
34. Sasaki N, Tatanou M, Anraku Y, Kishimura A, Kataoka K, Sato K. Characterization of nanoparticle permeability on a membrane-integrated microfluidic device. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences. 2013:1818-20.
35. Chueh BH, Huh D, Kyrtsos CR, Houssin T, Futai N, Takayama S. Leakage-free bonding of porous membranes into layered microfluidic array systems. Anal Chem. 2007; 79(9):3504-8. Epub 2007/03/29. doi: 10.1021/ac062118p PMID: 17388566; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2517097.
36. Imura Y, Asano Y, Sato K, Yoshimura E. A microfluidic system to evaluate intestinal absorption. Anal Sci. 2009; 25(12):1403-7. Epub 2009/12/17. doi: JST.JSTAGE/analsci/25.1403. PMID: 20009325.
37. Qi D, Hoelzlea DJ, Rowat AC. Probing single cells using flow in microfluidic devices. Eur Phys J Special Topics 2012; 204(1):85-101.
38. van der Meer AD, Poot AA, Feijen J, Vermes I. Analyzing shear stress-induced alignment of actin filaments in endothelial cells with a microfluidic assay. Biomicrofluidics. 2010; 4(1):11103. Epub 2010/07/21. doi: 10.1063/1.3366720 PMID: 20644662; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2905259.
39. Breiteneder-Geleff S, Soleiman A, Kowalski H, Horvat R, Amann G, Kriehuber E, et al. Angiosarcomas express mixed endothelial phenotypes of blood and lymphatic capillaries: podoplanin as a specific marker for lymphatic endothelium. Am J Pathol. 1999; 154(2):385-94. Epub 1999/02/23. doi: S0002- 9440(10)65285-6. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65285-6 PMID: 10027397; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1849992.
40. Harris ES, Nelson WJ. VE-cadherin: at the front, center, and sides of endothelial cell organization and function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010; 22(5):651-8. Epub 2010/08/17. doi: S0955-0674(10)00106-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.07.006 PMID: 20708398; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2948582.
41. Morita K, Sasaki H, Furuse M, Tsukita S. Endothelial claudin: claudin-5/TMVCF constitutes tight junction strands in endothelial cells. J Cell Biol. 1999; 147(1):185-94. Epub 1999/10/06. PMID: 10508865; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2164984.
42. Booth R, Kim H. Permeability analysis of neuroactive drugs through a dynamic microfluidic in vitro blood-brain barrier model. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014; 42(12):2379-91. Epub 2014/08/15. doi: 10.1007/ s10439-014-1086-5 PMID: 25118670.
43. Wu MH, Ustinova E, Granger HJ. Integrin binding to fibronectin and vitronectin maintains the barrier function of isolated porcine coronary venules. J Physiol. 2001; 532(Pt 3):785-91. Epub 2001/04/21. doi: PHY-11627. PMID: 11313446; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2278579.
44. Zheng Y, Chen J, Craven M, Choi NW, Totorica S, Diaz-Santana A, et al. In vitro microvessels for the study of angiogenesis and thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(24):9342-7. Epub 2012/ 05/31. doi: 1201240109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201240109 PMID: 22645376; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3386137.
45. Chen MB, Whisler JA, Jeon JS, Kamm RD. Mechanisms of tumor cell extravasation in an in vitro microvascular network platform. Integr Biol (Camb). 2013; 5(10):1262-71. Epub 2013/09/03. doi: 10.1039/ c3ib40149a PMID: 23995847; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4038741.
46. Lee H, Kim S, Chung M, Kim JH, Jeon NL. A bioengineered array of 3D microvessels for vascular permeability assay. Microvasc Res. 2014; 91:90-8. Epub 2013/12/18. doi: S0026-2862(13)00202-1. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2013.12.001 PMID: 24333621.
47. Rigor RR, Shen Q, Pivetti CD, Wu MH, Yuan SY. Myosin light chain kinase signaling in endothelial barrier dysfunction. Med Res Rev. 2013; 33(5):911-33. Epub 2012/08/14. doi: 10.1002/med.21270 PMID: 22886693; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3735785.
48. Kumar P, Shen Q, Pivetti CD, Lee ES, Wu MH, Yuan SY. Molecular mechanisms of endothelial hyperpermeability: implications in inflammation. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2009; 11:e19. Epub 2009/07/01. doi: S1462399409001112. doi: 10.1017/S1462399409001112 PMID: 19563700; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2828491.
49. Chen C, Khismatullin DB. Synergistic effect of histamine and TNF-alpha on monocyte adhesion to vascular endothelial cells. Inflammation. 2013; 36(2):309-19. Epub 2012/10/12. doi: 10.1007/s10753-012- 9548-0 PMID: 23053728.
50. Kondo H, Kondo S, Ikezawa H, Murata R. Studies on the quantitative method for determination of hemorrhagic activity of Habu snake venom. Jpn J Med Sci Biol. 1960; 13:43-52. Epub 1960/01/01. PMID: 13853435.
51. Theakston RD, Warrell DA, Griffiths E. Report of a WHO workshop on the standardization and control of antivenoms. Toxicon. 2003; 41(5):541-57. Epub 2003/04/05. doi: S0041010102003938. PMID: 12676433.
52. Morine N, Matsuda S, Terada K, Eto A, Ishida I, Oku H. Neutralization of hemorrhagic snake venom metalloproteinase HR1a from Protobothrops flavoviridis by human monoclonal antibody. Toxicon. 2008; 51(3):345-52. Epub 2007/12/07. doi: S0041-0101(07)00365-0. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2007.10. 009 PMID: 18061641.
53. Thompson VF, Saldana S, Cong J, Goll DE. A BODIPY fluorescent microplate assay for measuring activity of calpains and other proteases. Anal Biochem. 2000; 279(2):170-8. Epub 2000/03/09. doi: 10. 1006/abio.1999.4475. S0003-2697(99)94475-5. PMID: 10706786.
54. Maeda H, Nakamura H, Fang J. The EPR effect for macromolecular drug delivery to solid tumors: Improvement of tumor uptake, lowering of systemic toxicity, and distinct tumor imaging in vivo. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013; 65(1):71-9. Epub 2012/10/24. doi: S0169-409X(12)00320-1. doi: 10.1016/j. addr.2012.10.002 PMID: 23088862.
55. Bertrand N, Wu J, Xu X, Kamaly N, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014; 66:2-25. Epub 2013/ 11/26. doi: S0169-409X(13)00268-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.009 PMID: 24270007; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4219254.
56. Zhang XY, Lu WY. Recent advances in lymphatic targeted drug delivery system for tumor metastasis. Cancer Biol Med. 2014; 11(4):247-54. Epub 2015/01/23. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.04.003. cbm-11-04-247. PMID: 25610710; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4296090.