A devolved model for public involvement in the field of mental health research: case study learning

Health Expectations

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1302-1311

  Moule, Pam ^a   Davies, Rosie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

case study; community based model; mental health; public involvement in research

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; METHODOLOGY; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; SOCIAL WELFARE;

CHARITIES; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; DATA COLLECTION; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84947725852     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12426     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Department of Health. National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990; available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/19/contents, accessed 14 Feb 2014.
2. Department of Health and Concordat Signatories. Mental Health Crisis Care Concordat – Improving Outcomes for People Experiencing Mental Health Crisis. Department of Health, 2014; available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/281242/36353_Mental_Health_Crisis_accessible.pdf.
3. Mental Health Task Force User Group. Forging Our Futures: Lighting the Fire. London: Department of Health, 1995.
4. NHS Health Advisory Service. Voices in Partnership: Involving Service Users and Carers in Commissioning and Delivering Mental Health Services. London: Stationery Office, 1997.
5. National Health Service Act. Legislation.gov.uk. 2006, Chapter 2; available from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/41/contents, accessed 23 Jul 2014.
6. Local Government and Public Involvement Health Act. Legislation.gov.uk. 2007; available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/28/contents, accessed 16 Jul 2014.
7. Department of Health. Research for Health. London: HMSO, 1993.
8. Department of Health. Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, 2nd edn. London: HMSO, 2005.
9. National Institute for Health Research. Good practice guidance for the recruitment and involvement of service user and carer researchers. Clinical Research Network Mental Health, 2014; available from: https://www.can.nihr.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/mentalhealth/UserCarerResearcherGuidelinesMay2014_FINAL.pdf, accessed 09 Sep 2014.
10. INVOLVE. About INVOLVE. www.invo.og.uk; 2012, accessed 15 May 2014.
11. Staley K. Exploring Impact: Public Involvement in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE, 2009.
12. Staley K, Minogue V. User involvement leads to more ethically sound research. Clinical Ethics, 2006; 1: 95–100.
13. Telford R, Faulkner A. Learning about service user involvement in mental health research. Journal of Mental Health, 2004; 13: 549–559.
14. Happell B, Roper C. Consumer participation in mental health research: articulating a model to guide practice. Australasian Psychiatry, 2007; 15: 237–241.
15. Telford R, Boote J, Cooper C. What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 209–220.
16. Wright D, Foster C, Amir Z, Elliott J, Wilson R. Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expectations, 2010; 13: 359–368.
17. Kreindler S. Patient involvement and the politics of methodology. Canadian Public Administration, 2009; 52: 113–124.
18. Simpson E, House A. Involving service user in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services: systematic review. BMJ, 2002; 325: 1265.
19. Milewa T. Community participation and health care priorities: reflections on policy, theatre and reality in Britain. Health Promotion International, 1997; 12: 161–167.
20. Perkins R, Goddard K. Reality out of the rhetoric: increasing user involvement in a mental health trust. Mental Health Review Journal, 2004; 9: 21–24.
21. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2011; 27: 391–399.
22. Staniszewska S, Adebajo A, Barber R et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 2011; 35: 628–632.
23. Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Seers K, Herron-Marx S, Bayliss H. The PIRICOM Study: A Systematic Review of the Conceptualisation, Measurement, Impact and Outcomes of Patients and Public Involvement in Health and Social Care Research. London: UKCRC, 2010.
24. Evans D, Coad J, Cottrell K et al. Public involvement in research: assessing impact through a realist evaluation. Health Services and Delivery Research, 2014; 2 Available from: http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/volume-2/issue-36#abstract.
25. Putting People First Consortium. Think local, act personal. A sector-wide commitment to moving forward with personalisation and community-based support January 2011. 2010; Available at: www.thinklocalactpersonal.org.uk, accessed 18 May 2014.
26. Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn. London: Sage, 2009.
27. Crawford M, Rutter D, Thelwall S. User Involvement in Change Management: A Review of the Literature. London: NCCSDO, 2003 Available at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/64339/FR-08-1201-018.pdf.
28. Martin G. Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management. Social Science and Medicine, 2008; 67: 1757–1765.
29. Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K et al. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expectations, 2013; 18: 661–675. doi:10.1111/hex.12158.
30. Shippee N, Domecq Garces JP, Prutsky Lopez GJ et al. Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expectations, 2013; 18: 1151–1166. doi:10.1111/hex.12090.
31. Nathan S, Harris E, Kemp L, Harris-Roxas B. Health service staff attitudes to community representatives on committees. Journal of Health Organisation and Management, 2006; 20: 551–559.
32. Pickin C, Popay J. Developing a model to enhance the capacity of statutory organisations to engage with lay communities. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2002; 7: 34–42.
33. Boote J, Baird W, Beecroft C. Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy, 2010; 95: 10–23.
34. Staley K, Buckland S, Hayes H, Tarpey M. The missing links': understanding how context and mechanism influence the impact of public involvement in research. Health Expectations, 2014; 17: 755–764.
35. Hewlett S, de Wit M, Richards P et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicialities and benefits. Arthritis and Rheumatism (Arthritis Care and Research), 2006; 55: 676–680.