Effectiveness, efficiency, and appeal: pick any two? The influence of learning domains and learning outcomes on designer judgments of useful instructional methods

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 937-955

  Honebein, Peter C ^a   Honebein, Cass H ^a  

^a Customer Performance Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Instructional theory; Learning domains; Learning outcomes; Methods; Sacrifice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947489135     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-015-9396-3     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time, and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management,17(6), 337–342.
2. Baytak, A., & Land, S. M. (2011). An investigation of the artifacts and process of constructing computer games about environmental science in a fifth grade classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development,59(1), 765–782. doi:10.1007/s11423-010-9184-z.
3. Beatty, B. J. (2009). Fostering integrated learning outcomes across domains. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 275–299). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological),57(1), 289–300.
5. Clark, F. E., & Angert, J. F. (1980). Instructional design research and teacher education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX, 8 Feb 1980. ERIC Document 183528.
6. Collins, A. (1993). Design issues for learning environments. Center for Technology in Education, Technical Report No. 27. ERIC Document 357733.
7. Cuellar, M. (2010). Assessing project success: moving beyond the triple constraint. International Research Workshop on IT Project Management, 2010, Paper 13. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/irwitpm2010/13.
8. Frei, F. X. (2006). Breaking the trade-off between efficiency and service. Harvard Business Review,84(11), 92–101.
9. Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of Experimental Psychology,141(1), 2–18. doi:10.1037/a0024338.
10. Gibbons, A. S., McConkie, M., Seo, K. K., & Wiley, D. A. (2009). Simulation approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 167–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Gibson, J. T. (2009). Discussion approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 99–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Gropper, G. L., & Kress, G. C. (1965). Individualizing instruction through pacing procedures. AV Communications Review,13(2), 165–182.
13. Hannifin, M. J., & Rieber, L. P. (1989). Psychological foundations of instructional design for emerging computer-based instructional technologies, part II. Educational Technology Research and Development,37(2), 102–114.
14. Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development,48(3), 23–48.
15. Honebein, P. H., & Honebein, C. H. (2014). The influence of cognitive domain content levels and gender on design judgments regarding useful instructional methods. Educational Technology Research and Development,62(1), 53–69. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9322-5.
16. Lindsey, L., & Berger, N. (2009). Experiential approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 117–142). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Morrison, G., Ross, S., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. (2011). Designing effective instruction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
18. Otto, K. N., & Antonsson, E. K. (2001). Trade-off strategies in engineering design. In E. K. Antonsson (Ed.), Imprecision in engineering design. Pasadena: Engineering Design Research Laboratory, Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology.
19. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 5–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2009). Understanding instructional theory. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 3–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Reigeluth, C. M., & Keller, J. B. (2009). Understanding instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 27–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Savery, J. R. (2009). Problem-based approach to instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. III, pp. 143–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Tosti, D. T., & Ball, J. R. (1969). A behavioral approach to instructional design and media selection. AV Communications Review,17(1), 5–24.
25. Weber, K., & Custer, R. (2005). Gender-based preferences toward technology education content, activities, and instructional methods. Journal of Technology Education,16(2), 55–71.
26. Weston, C., & Cranton, P. A. (1986). Selecting instructional strategies. The Journal of Higher Education,57(3), 259–288.
27. Wilson, B. G. (2004). Designing E-learning environments for flexible activity and instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development,52(4), 77–84.
28. Wiske, M. S., & Beatty, B. J. (2009). Fostering understanding outcomes. In C. M. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models (Vol. III, pp. 225–247). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.