Quantifying the cognitive extent of science

Journal of Informetrics

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 962-973

  Milojević, Staša ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Big science; Cognitive extent; Collaboration; Growth of science; Team science

Indexed keywords

BIG DATA;

BIG SCIENCE; COGNITIVE EXTENT; COLLABORATION; GROWTH OF SCIENCE; TEAM SCIENCE;

PUBLISHING;

EID: 84947430883     PISSN: 17511577     EISSN: 18755879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bartusiak M. The day we found the universe 2009, Vintage Books, New York, NY.
2. Bazerman C. Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science 1988, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
3. Bordons M., Gomez I. Collaboration networks in science. The web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield 2000, 197-213. Information Today, Medford, NJ. B. Cronin, H.B. Atkins (Eds.).
4. Börner K., Contractor N., Falk-Krzesinski H.J., Fiore S.M., Hall K.L., Keyton J., et al. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Science Translational Medicine 2010, 2(49):49cm24.
5. Bornmann L., Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2015, 66(11):2215-2222.
6. Braam R.R., Moed H.F., van Raan A.F.J. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1991, 42(4):233-251.
7. Braam R.R., Moed H.F., van Raan A.F.J. Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. II. Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1991, 42(4):252-266.
8. Callon M., Courtial J.P., Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 1991, 22(1):155-205.
9. Callon M., Courtial J.P., Turner W.A., Bauin S. From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information 1983, 22(2):191-235.
10. Cole J.R., Cole S. The Ortega hypothesis. Science 1972, 178(4059):368-375.
11. Courtial J.P., Law J. A co-word study of artificial intelligence. Social Studies of Science 1989, 19:301-311.
12. Foster J.G., Rzhetsky A., Evans J.A. Tradition and innovation in scientists' research strategies. American Sociological Review 2015, 80:875-908.
13. Franzoni C. Exploratory attitude and creativity in science. Paper presented at the opening up innovation: Strategy, organization and technology 2010, Imperial College London Business School.
14. Galison P. Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics 1997, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
15. Geiger R.L. What happened after Sputnik? Shaping university research in the United States. Minerva 1997, 35(4):349-367.
16. Guimerà R., Uzzi B., Spiro J., Amaral L.A. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 2005, 308:697-702.
17. Henneken E.A., Kurtz M.J., Guenther E., Accomazzi A., Grant C.S., Thompson D., et al. E-print journals and journal articles in astronomy: A productive co-existence. Learned Publishing 2007, 20(1):16-22.
18. Jarvis S. Defining and measuring lexical diversity. Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures 2013, 13-44. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam. S. Jarvis, M. Daller (Eds.).
19. Jones B.F., Wuchty S., Uzzi B. Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science 2008, 322:1259-1262.
20. Kaiser D. Booms, busts, and the world of ideas: Enrollment pressures and the challenge of specialization. Osiris 2012, 27(1):276-302.
21. Kochen M. Integrative mechanisms in literature growth 1974, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
22. Koizumi R. Relationship between text length and lexical diversity measures: Can we use short texts of less than 100 tokens?. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction 2012, 1(1):60-69.
23. Kuhn T., Perc M., Helbing D. Inheritance patterns in citation networks reveal scientific memes. Physical Review X 2014, 4:041036.
24. Larsen P.O., von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 2010, 84(3):575-603.
25. Leydesdorff L. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Research Policy 1989, 18:209-223.
26. Light R.P., Polley D.E., Börner K. Open data and open code for big science of science studies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference 2013.
27. Malvern D., Richards B., Chipere N., Durán P. Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment 2004, Palgrave MacMillan, New York, NY.
28. McCarthy P.M., Jarvis S. vocd: A theoretical and empirical evaluation. Language Testing 2007, 24(4):459-488.
29. McKee G., Malvern D., Richards B. Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software. Literary and Linguistic Computing 2000, 15(3):323-337.
30. Menard H.W. Science: Growth and change 1971, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Milojević S. Multidisciplinary cognitive content of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 2012, 14(1):1-28.
32. Milojević S. Principles of scientific research team formation and evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) 2014, 111(11):3984-3989.
33. Milojević S., Sugimoto C.R., Yan E., Ding Y. The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2011, 62(10):1933-1953.
34. Morange M. A history of molecular biology 2000, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Mulvey P.J., Nicholson S. Trends in physics PhDs AIP focus on 2014, AIP Statistical Research Center, College Park, MA.
36. Noyons E.C.M., van Raan A.F.J. Monitoring scientific developments from a dynamic perspective: Self-organized structuring to map neural network research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998, 49(1):68-81.
37. Pautasso M. Publication growth in biological sub-fields: Patterns, predictability and sutainability. Sustainability 2012, 4(12):3234-3247.
38. Perc M. Self-organization of progress across the century of physics. Scientific Reports 2013, 3:1720.
39. Price D.J.d.S. Science since Babylon 1961, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
40. Price D.J.d.S. Little science, big science 1963, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
41. Rip A., Courtial J.P. Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics. Scientometrics 1984, 6(6):381-400.
42. Rowe G.L., Ambre S.A., Burgoon J.W., Ke W., Börner K. The Scholarly Database and its utility for scientometrics research. Scientometrics 2009, 79(2):219-234.
43. Shrum W., Genuth J., Chompalov I. Structures of scientific collaboration 2007, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
44. Stephan P.E. How economics shapes science 2012, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. Tabah A.N. Literature dynamics: Studies on growth, diffusion, and epidemics. Annual review of information science and technology (ARIST) 1999, vol. 34:249-286. Information Today, Medford, NJ.
46. Tang L., Hu G. Tracing the footprint of knowledge spillover: Evidence from U.S.-China collaboration in nanotechnology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2013, 64:1791-1801.
47. Teitelbaum M.S. Falling behind? Boom, bust, and the global race for scientific talent 2014, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
48. Uzzi B., Mukherjee S., Stringer M., Jones B.F. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 2013, 342(6157):468-472.
49. van Raan A.F.J. On growth, ageing, and fractal differentiation of science. Scientometrics 2000, 47(2):347-362.
50. van Raan A.F.J., Tijssen R.J.W. The neural net of neural network research: An exercise in bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 1993, 26(1):169-192.
51. Wagner C.S. The new invisible college: Science for development 2008, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
52. Weinberg A.M. Impact of large-scale science on the United States. Science 1961, 134(3473):161-164.
53. Whittaker J., Courtial J.P., Law J. Creativity and conformity in science: Titles, keywords and co-word analysis. Social Studies of Science 1989, 19(3):473-496.
54. Wuchty S., Jones B.F., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007, 316(5827):1036-1039.
55. Xie Y., Killewald A.A. Is American science in decline? 2012, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
56. Zitt M. A simple method for dynamic scientometrics using lexical analysis. Scientometrics 1991, 22(1):229-252.
57. Zitt M., Bassecoulard E. Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical and citation analysis. Scientometrics 1994, 30(1):333-351.