Publication growth in biological sub-fields: Patterns, predictability and sustainability

Sustainability

Volumn 4, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3234-3247

  Pautasso, Marco ^a,b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Domain du Petit Arbois   (France)

Author keywords

Biological sciences; File drawer problem; Information overload; Meta knowledge; Peak in scientific output; Peer review; Publication explosion; Publish or perish; Scientometrics; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; DATA ACQUISITION; INFORMATION; KNOWLEDGE; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84872385967     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su4123234     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Lehman, H.C. The exponential increase of man's cultural output. Social Forces 1947, 25, 281-290.
2. Weiss, P. Knowledge: A growth process. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 1960, 104, 242-247.
3. de Solla Price, D. Little Science, Big Science; Columbia University Press: New York, USA, 1963.
4. Garfield, E. Economics and realpolitik of exponential information growth or journal selection aint easy. Curr. Cont. 1973, 34, 5-6.
5. Sengupta, I.N. The growth of biophysical literature. Scientometrics 1986, 8, 365-375.
6. Freedman, B. Growth and change in the world's biological literature as reflected in BIOSIS publications. Publ. Res. Quart. 1995, 11, 61-79.
7. Lamb, C. Open access publishing models: Opportunity or threat to scholarly and academic publishers? Learned Publ. 2004, 17, 143-150, doi:10.1087/095315104322958526.
8. Carroll, P.T. American science transformed. Am. Sci. 1986, 74, 466-485.
9. Lawrence, P.A. The politics of publication. Nature 2003, 422, 259-261, doi:10.1038/422259a.
10. Kostoff, R.N. Overcoming specialization. BioScience 2002, 52, 937-941, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0937:OS]2.0.CO;2.
11. Sengupta, I. The growth of knowledge and literature in neuroscience. Scientometrics 1989, 17, 253-288, doi:10.1007/BF02026413.
12. Patra, S.K.; Mishra, S. Bibliometric study of bioinformatics literature. Scientometrics 2006, 67, 477-489, doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0065-5.
13. Vain, P. Global trends in plant transgenic science and technology (1973-2003). Trends Biotech. 2006, 24, 206-211, doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.03.005.
14. Tian, Y.; Wen, C.; Hong, S. Global scientific production on GIS research by bibliometric analysis from 1997 to 2006. J. Informetrics 2008, 2, 65-74.
15. DeShazo, J.P.; LaVallie, D.L.; Wolf, F.M. Publication trends in the medical informatics literature: 20 years of "Medical Informatics" in MeSH. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making 2009, 9, 7, doi:10.1186/1472-6947-9-7.
16. Yu, J.J.; Wang, M.H.; Xu, M.; Ho, Y.S. A bibliometric analysis of research papers published on photosynthesis: 1992-2009. Photosynthetica 2012, 50, 5-14, doi:10.1007/s11099-012-0010-1.
17. Larsen, P.O.; von Ins, M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 575-603, doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z.
18. Pautasso, M. Fungal under-representation is (slowly) diminishing in the life sciences. Fung. Ecol. 2013, in press, doi:10.1016/j.funeco.2012.04.004.
19. Matia, K.; Amaral, L.A.N.; Luwel, M.; Moed, H.F.; Stanley, H.E. Scaling phenomena in the growth dynamics of scientific output. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 2005, 56, 893-902, doi:10.1002/ asi.20183.
20. Ketcham, C.M.; Crawford, J.M. The impact of review articles. Laborat. Investig. 2007, 87, 1174-1185, doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700688.
21. Hughes, L.; Rudolph, J. Future world oil production: growth, plateau, or peak? Curr. Opin. Enviro. Sust. 2011, 3, 225-234, doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2011.05.001.
22. Stogios, P.J. Basic science after peak oil. Scientist 2011, 25, 4-14.
23. MacKay, D.J.C. Sustainable Energy-Without the Hot Air; UIT: Cambridge, UK, 2008.
24. Fernández-Cano, A.; Torralbo, M.; Vallejo, M. Reconsidering Price's model of scientific growth: An overview. Scientometrics 2004, 61, 301-321, doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045112.11562.11.
25. Tabah, A.N. Literature dynamics: Studies on growth, diffusion, and epidemics. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Tech. 1999, 34, 249-276.
26. Pautasso, M. Worsening file-drawer problem in the abstracts of natural, medical and social science databases. Scientometrics 2010, 85, 193-202, doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0233-5.
27. Michels, C.; Schmoch, U. The growth of science and database coverage. Scientometrics 2012, in press, doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0732-7.
28. Shepherd, P.R. How can we make publishing less painful? Biochem. J. 2012, 443, 1, doi:10.1042/BJ20120214.
29. Fraser, A.G.; Dunstan, F.D. On the impossibility of being expert. BMJ 2010, 341, c6815, doi:10.1136/bmj.c6815.
30. Alexander, I.J.; Slater, H. New Phytologist goes online-only from January 2012. New Phytol. 2011, 192, 783-786, doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03866.x.
31. Berners-Lee, M. How Bad Are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint of Everything; Profile Books: London, UK, 2010.
32. Chowdhury, G. Carbon footprint of the knowledge sector: What's the future? J. Document. 2010, 66, 934-946, doi:10.1108/00220411011087878.
33. Chowdhury, G. An agenda for green information retrieval research. Inf. Proc. Manage. 2012, 48, 1067-1077, doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.02.003.
34. Komarek, T.M.; Lupi, F.; Kaplowitz, M.D. Valuing energy policy attributes for environmental management: Choice experiment evidence from a research institution. Energ. Pol. 2011, 39, 5105-5115, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.054.
35. Ehrlich, P.R.; Wolff, G.; Daily, G.C.; Hughes, J.B.; Daily, S.; Dalton, M.; Goulder, L. Knowledge and the environment. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 30, 267-284, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00130-X.
36. Wiedmann, T.; Barrett, J. A greenhouse gas footprint analysis of UK Central Government, 1990-2008. Enviro. Sci. Pol. 2011, 14, 1041-1051, doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.005.
37. Durack, D.T. The weight of medical knowledge. N. Engl. J. Med. 1978, 298, 773-775, doi:10.1056/NEJM197804062981405.
38. Moulding, T. Solutions to the publication explosion. J. Med. Educ. 1978, 53, 355-357.
39. Lee, A.; Dennis, C.; Campbell, P. Nature's guide for mentors. Nature 2007, 447, 791-797, doi:10.1038/447791a.
40. Coomes, O.T.; Moore, T.; Paterson, J.; Breau, S.; Ross, N.A.; Roulet, N. Academic performance indicators for departments of geography in the United States and Canada. Prof. Geog. 2013, in press, doi:10.1080/00330124.2012.697798.
41. Bertamini, M.; Munafò, M.R. Bite-size science and its undesired side effects. Persp. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 7, 67-71, doi:10.1177/1745691611429353.
42. Taylor, S.W.; Fender, B.F.; Burke, K.G. Unraveling the academic productivity of economists: The opportunity costs of teaching and service. Southern Econ. J. 2006, 72, 846-859.
43. Uriarte, M.; Ewing, H.A.; Eviner, V.T.; Weathers, K.C. Constructing a broader and more inclusive value system in science. BioScience 2007, 57, 71-78.