Multidisciplinary cognitive content of nanoscience and nanotechnology

Journal of Nanoparticle Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Milojević, Staša ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Multidisciplinarity; Nanoscale science and engineering; Nanotechnology research; Nanotechnology trends; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; MULTIDISCIPLINARITY; NANOSCALE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING; NANOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH; SCIENTOMETRICS;

CARBON NANOTUBES; INFORMATION SERVICES; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; SOLIDS;

NANOSCIENCE;

CARBON NANOTUBE; NANOPARTICLE;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY; NANOCHEMISTRY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PHYSICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY;

EID: 84855487727     PISSN: 13880764     EISSN: 1572896X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-011-0685-4     Document Type: Review

References (51)

1. Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, Guston DH (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement, and integration. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J (eds) The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 979-1000
2. Bassecoulard E, Lelu A, Zitt M (2007) Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: a preliminary analysis. Scientometrics 70(3):859-880
3. Berube DM (2006) Nano-hype: the truth behind the nanotechnology buzz. Prometheus Books, Amherst
4. Braun T, Schubert A, Zsindely S (1997) Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 38(2):321-325 (Pubitemid 127457640)
5. Callon M, Courtial JP, Turner WA, Bauin S (1983) From translations to problematic networks: an introduction to coword analysis. Soc Sci Inf 22(2):191-235
6. Darby MR, Zucker LG (2003) Grilichesian breakthroughs: Inventions of methods of inventing and firm entry into nanotechnology. NBER Working Paper, No. 9825
7. Glänzel W, Meyer M, Du Plessis M, Thijs B, Magerman T, Schlemmer B et al (2003) Nanotechnology: analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavour. Report of Steunpunt O&O Statistieken, Leuven
8. Hayles NK (2004) Connecting the quantum dots: nanotechscience and culture. In: Hayles NK (ed) Nanoculture: implications of the new technoscience. Intellect Books, Bristol, pp 11-26
9. Heinze T (2004) Nanoscience and nanotechnology in Europe: analysis of publications and patent applications including comparisons with the United States. Nanotechnol Law Bus 1(4):427-445
10. Huang C, Chen HC, Chen ZK, Roco MC (2004) International nanotechnology development in 2003: county, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. J Nanopart Res 6(4):325-354
11. Huang C, Notten A, Rasters N (2011) Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. J Technol Transfer 36:145-172
12. Hullmann A, Meyer M (2003) Publications and patents in nanotechnology: an overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics 58(3):507-527 (Pubitemid 39109239)
13. Jacoby M (2000) New tools for tiny jobs. Chem Eng News 78(42):33-35
14. Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for clustering data. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
15. Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
16. Latour B, Woolgar S (1986) Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press, Princeton
17. Leydesdorff L (1989) Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Res Policy 18:209-223
18. Leydesdorff L, Zhou P (2007) Nanotechnology as a field of science: its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics 70(3):693-713
19. Li X, Chen H, Dang Y, Lin Y, Larson CA, Roco MC (2008) A longitudinal analysis of nanotechnology literature: 1976-2004. J Nanopart Res 10(Supplement 1):3-22
20. Lucio-Arias D, Leydesdorff L (2007) Knowledge emergence in scientific communication: from "fullerenes" to "nanotubes". Scientometrics 70(3):603-632
21. Meyer M (2001) Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano-science and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 51(1):163-183 (Pubitemid 33690685)
22. Meyer M, Bhattacharya S (2004) Commonalities and differences between scholarly and technical collaboration: an exploration of co-invention and co-authorship analyses. Scientometrics 61(3):443-456 (Pubitemid 39393450)
23. Meyer M, Persson O (1998) Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics 42(2):195-205 (Pubitemid 128456820)
24. Milburn C (2004) Nanotechnology in the age of posthuman engineering: science fiction as science. In: Hayles NK (ed) Nanoculture: implications of the new technoscience. Intellect Books, Portland, pp 109-129
25. Milojević S (2009) Big science, nano science?: mapping the evolution and socio-cognitive structure of nanoscience/ nanotechnology using mixed methods. University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles
26. Milojević S (2010) Modes of collaboration in modern science: beyond power laws and preferential attachment. J Am Soc Inf Sci 61(7):1410-1423
27. Mody CCM (2006) Corporations, universities, and instrumental communities: commercializing probemicroscopy, 1981-1996. Technol Cult 47:56-80 (Pubitemid 43587836)
28. Monthioux M, Serp P, Flahaut E, Razafinimanana M, Laurent C, Peigney A et al (2007) Introduction to carbon nanotubes. In: Bhushan B (ed) Springer handbook of nanotechnology. Springer, Berlin, pp 43-112
29. Noyons ECM, Buter RK, van Raan AFJ, Schmoch U, Heinze T, Hinze S et al (2003) Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: nanoscience and nanotechnology. Leiden University, Leiden
30. NSF (National Science Foundation) (1997) "Partnership in nanotechnology" program announcement. Arlington, VA. http://www.nsf.gov/ publications/pub-summ.jsp?ods-key=nsf9820
31. Porter AL, Youtie J (2009) How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? J Nanopart Res 11:1023-1041
32. Porter AL,Youtie J, Shapira P, Schoeneck DJ (2008) Refining search terms for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 10(5):715-728 (Pubitemid 351579773)
33. Provalis Research (2005) WordStat: content analysis module for SIMSTAT & QDA Minder: User's Guide, from http://www.provalisresearch.com/Documents/ wordstat51.pdf]
34. Rafols I, Meyer M (2007) How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics 70(3):633-650
35. Roco MC (2008) Possibilities for global governance of converging technologies. J Nanopart Res 10:11-29 (Pubitemid 350164609)
36. Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 13:427-445
37. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (eds) (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. National Science Foundation, Arlington
38. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2002) Converging technologies for improving human performance: integrating from the nanoscale. J Nanopart Res 4:281-295 (Pubitemid 135713429)
39. Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2005) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology: maximizing human benefit. J Nanopart Res 7:1-13 (Pubitemid 40537820)
40. Roco MC, Mirkin CA, Hersam MC (2011) Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020: summary of international study. J Nanopart Res 13:897-919
41. Schummer J (2004a) Interdisciplinary issues in nanoscale research. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J (eds) Discovering the nanoscale. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 9-20
42. Schummer J (2004b) Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59(3):425-463
43. Smith DL (1995) Thin-film deposition: principles & practice. McGraw-Hill, New York
44. Toumey C (2009) Plenty of room, plenty of history. Nat Nanotechnol 4:783-784
45. Toumey C (2010) In the footsteps of biotech. Nat Nanotechnol 5:475
46. Wajcman J (2008) Emergent technosciences. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J (eds) The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 813-816
47. Weber RP (1990) Basic content analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Newbury Park
48. Youtie J, Shapira P, Porter A (2008) Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. J Nanopart Res 10:981-986
49. Zucker LG, Darby MR (2005) Socio-economic impact of nanoscale science: initial results and NanoBank. NBER Working Paper 11181
50. Zucker LG, Darby MR (2007) Nanobank Data Description release 2.0 (beta-test). UCLA Center for International Science, Technology and Cultural Policy and Nanobank, Los Angeles, 17 Jan 2007-2 Feb 2009
51. Zucker LG, Darby MR, Furner J, Liu RC, Ma H (2007) Minerva unbound: knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Res Policy 36(6):850-863 (Pubitemid 46898554)