Immediate postpartum provision of long-acting reversible contraception

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 460-464

  Goldthwaite, Lisa M ^a   Shaw, Kate A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Contraceptive implant; Interpregnancy interval; Intrauterine device; Long acting reversible contraception; Postpartum

Indexed keywords

BREAST FEEDING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTRACEPTION; COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPREGNANCY INTERVAL; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; LEVONORGESTREL RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM; LONG ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PARAMETERS CONCERNING THE FETUS, NEWBORN AND PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGESTIN IMPLANT; PUERPERIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVICES; FAMILY PLANNING; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; OBSTETRIC DELIVERY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

LEVONORGESTREL;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTRACEPTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; LEVONORGESTREL; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84947126871     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: 1473656X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000224     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Ross J, Winfrey W. Contraceptive use, intention to use and unmet need during the extended postpartum period. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2001; 27:20-27.
2. Moore Z, Pfitzer A, Gubin R, et al. Missed opportunities for family planning: an analysis of pregnancy risk and contraceptive method use among postpartum women in 21 low-and middle-income countries. Contraception 2015; 92:31-39.
3. Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermudez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295:1809-1823.
4. Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:589-594.
5. White K, Teal SB, Potter JE. Contraception after delivery and short inter-pregnancy intervals among women in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125:1471-1477.
6. Teal SB. Postpartum contraception: optimizing interpregnancy intervals. Contraception 2014; 89:487-488.
7. Zapata LB, Murtaza S, Whiteman MK, et al. Contraceptive counseling and post-partum contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212:171.e1-171.e8.
8. Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1998-2007.
9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrau-terine devices. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 118:184-196.
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1434-1438.
11. Kapp N, Curtis KM. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Contraception 2009; 80:327-336.
12. Chen BA, Reeves MF, Hayes JL, et al. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1079-1087.
13. Whitaker AK, Endres LK, Mistretta SQ, Gilliam ML. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception 2014; 89:534-539.
14. Lester F, Kakaire O, Byamugisha J, et al. Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception 2015; 91:198-203.
15. Levi EE, Stuart GS, Zerden ML, et al. Intrauterine device placement during cesarean delivery and continued use 6 months postpartum: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:5-11.
16. Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Hubacher D, et al. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 6:CD003036.
17. Blumenthal PD, Eber M, Vajpayee J. Dedicated inserter facilitates immediate postpartum IUD insertion. Glob Health Sci Pract 2013; 1:428-429.
18. Kapp N, Curtis K, Nanda K. Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: a systematic review. Contraception 2010; 82:17-37.
19. Gurtcheff SE, Turok DK, Stoddard G, et al. Lactogenesis after early post-partum use of the contraceptive implant: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:1114-1121.
20. Chen BA, Reeves MF, Creinin MD, Schwarz EB. Postplacental or delayed levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion and breast-feeding duration. Contraception 2011; 84:499-504.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Report Card: United States/2014. Jul 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2014breastfeedingreportcard.pdf.
22. Tocce KM, Sheeder JL, Teal SB. Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 206:481.e1-481.e7.
23. Han L, Teal SB, Sheeder J, Tocce K. Preventing repeat pregnancy in adolescents: is immediate postpartum insertion of the contraceptive implant cost effective? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:24.e1-24.e7.
24. Thiel de Bocanegra H, Chang R, Howell M, Darney P. Interpregnancy intervals: impact of postpartum contraceptive effectiveness and coverage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:311.e1-311.e8.
25. Aiken AR, Creinin MD, Kaunitz AM, et al. Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives. Contraception 2014; 90:466-467.
26. Washington CI, Jamshidi R, Thung SF, et al. Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril 2015; 103:131-137.