Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives

Contraception

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 466-467

  Aiken, Abigail R A ^a   Creinin, Mitchell D ^b   Kaunitz, Andrew M ^c   Nelson, Anita L ^d   Trussell, James ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; LEVONORGESTREL; DRUG IMPLANT;

CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; DIAGNOSIS RELATED GROUP; DRUG EFFICACY; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITAL BED; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT STERILIZATION; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MEDICAID; MEDICAL FEE; MOTHER; OBSTETRIC PROCEDURE; PLACENTAL DELIVERY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PUERPERIUM; REIMBURSEMENT; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; WOMEN'S HEALTH; DRUG IMPLANT; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COST;

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; DRUG IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; POSTPARTUM PERIOD;

EID: 84923171133     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.08.005     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Teal SB. Postpartum contraception: optimizing interpregnancy intervals. Contraception 2014;89:487-8.
2. Borrero S, Zite N, Potter JE, Trussell J. Medicaid policy on sterilization - anachronistic or still relevant? N Engl J Med 2014;370:102-4.
3. Rodriguez MI, Evans M, Espey E. Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost. Contraception 2014 in press. Available online athttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/aip/00107824.
4. Chen BA, Reeves MF, Creinin MD, Schwarz EB. Postplacental or delayed levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion and breast-feeding duration. Contraception 2011;84:499-504.
5. Chen BA, Reeves MF, Hayes JL, Hohmann HL, Perriera LK, Creinin MD. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1079-87.
6. Celen S, Möröy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danişman N. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception 2004;69:279-82.
7. Whitaker AK, Endres LK, Mistretta SQ, Gilliam ML. Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception 2014;89:534-9.
8. Tocce KM, Sheeder JL, Teal SB. Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:481.e1-7.
9. Potter JE, Hopkins K, Aiken AR, Lopez CH, Stevenson AJ, White K, Grossman D. Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas. Contraception 2014 in press. Available online athttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/aip/00107824.
10. Trussell J, Guthrie KA. Choosing a contraceptive: efficacy, safety, and personal considerations. In: Hatcher RA, Trussell J, Nelson AL, Cates W, Kowal D, & Policar M, editors. Contraceptive Technology: Twentieth. New York NY: Ardent Media; 2011, pp. 45-74.
11. Han L, Teal SB, Sheeder J. Preventing repeat pregnancy in adolescents: is immediate postpartum insertion of the contraceptive implant cost effective? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:24. e1-7.
12. Rodriguez MI, Caughey AB, Edelman A, Darney PD, Foster DG. Cost-benefit analysis of state- and hospital-funded postpartum intrauterine contraception at a university hospital for recent immigrants to the United States. Contraception 2010;81:304-8.