Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 5-11

  Levi, Erika E ^b   Stuart, Gretchen S ^a   Zerden, Matthew L ^a   Garrett, Joanne M ^a   Bryant, Amy G ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ENDOMETRITIS; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; LEVONORGESTREL RELEASING INTRAUTERINE SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIAGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PELVIC PAIN; PLACENTAL DELIVERY; POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; MIDDLE AGED; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84932121511     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000882     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tocce KM, Sheeder JL, Teal SB. Rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: do immediate postpartum contraceptive implants make a difference? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:481. e1-7.
2. Speroff L, Mishell DR Jr. The postpartum visit: it's time for a change in order to optimally initiate contraception. Contraception 2008;78:90-8.
3. Ogburn JA, Espey E, Stonehocker J. Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women. Contraception 2005; 72:426-9.
4. Lu MC, Prentice J. The postpartum visit: risk factors for nonuse and association with breast-feeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187:1329-36.
5. DiBari JN, Yu SM, Chao SM, Lu MC. Use of postpartum care: predictors and barriers. J Pregnancy 2014;2014:530769.
6. Bryant AS, Haas JS,McElrath TF,McCormickMC. Predictors of compliance with the postpartum visit among women living in healthy start project areas. Matern Child Health J 2006;10:511-6.
7. Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Van Vliet HA, Stanwood NL. Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD003036. DOI: 10. 1002/14651858. CD003036. pub2.
8. Kapp N, Curtis KM. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Contraception 2009; 80:327-36.
9. Zhou SW, Chi IC. Immediate postpartum IUD insertions in a Chinese hospital-a two year follow-up. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991;35:157-64.
10. Celen S, Möröy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danisman N. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception 2004;69:279-82.
11. Letti Müller AL, Lopes Ramos JG, Martins-Costa SH, Palma Dias RS, Valério EG, Hammes LS, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the expulsion rate of intrauterine devices inserted in the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study. Contraception 2005;72:192-5.
12. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials 2010;11:32.
13. Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:1105-13.
14. Sivin I, Schmidt F. Effectiveness of IUDs: a review. Contraception 1987;36:55-84.
15. Rivera R, Chen-Mok M, McMullen S. Analysis of client characteristics that may affect early discontinuation of the TCu-380A IUD. Contraception 1999;60:155-60.
16. Bergin A, Tristan S, Terplan M, Gilliam ML, Whitaker AK. A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement. Contraception 2012;86:694-7.
17. Aiken AR, Creinin MD, Kaunitz AM, Nelson AL, Trussell J. Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives. Contraception 2014;90:466-7.
18. Baldwin MK, Edelman AB. The effect of long-acting reversible contraception on rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents: a review. J Adolesc Health 2013;52(suppl):S47-53.
19. Rodriguez MI, Evans M, Espey E. Advocating for immediate postpartum LARC: increasing access, improving outcomes, and decreasing cost. Contraception 2014;90:468-71.
20. Rodriguez MI, Caughey AB, Edelman A, Darney PD, Foster DG. Cost-benefit analysis of state-and hospital-funded postpartum intrauterine contraception at a university hospital for recent immigrants to the United States. Contraception 2010; 81:304-8.
21. Marchi NM, Castro S, Hidalgo MM, Hidalgo C, Monteiro-Dantas C, Villarroeal M, et al. Management of missing strings in users of intrauterine contraceptives. Contraception 2012;86: 354-8.
22. Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Practice Bulletin No. 121. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118: 184-96.
23. Osterman MJ, Martin JA, Mathews TJ, Hamilton BE. Expanded data from the new birth certificate, 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2011;59:1-28.