Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 131-137

  Washington, Chantel I ^a   Jamshidi, Roxanne ^a   Thung, Stephen F ^b   Nayeri, Unzila A ^c   Caughey, Aaron B ^d   Werner, Erika F ^a,e  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c SUNY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Contraception; Expulsion; Pregnancy; QALY; Utility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BARRIER CONTRACEPTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION TREE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERIUM; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; UNWANTED PREGNANCY; ADULT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICE EXPULSION; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84924423291     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.032     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mosher WD, Jones J. Use of contraception in the United States: 1982-2008. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 23 2010:1-44.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Practice Bulletin No. 121. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:184-96.
3. Chen BA, Reeves MF, Hayes JL, Hohmann HL, Perriera LK, Creinin MD. Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized control trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1079-87.
4. Shulman JJ, Merritt CG. Postpartum contraception: subsequent pregnancy, delivery and abortion rates. Fertil Steril 1976;27:97-103.
5. Ogburn JA, Espey E, Stonehocker J. Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women. Contraception 2005;72:426-9.
6. Templeman CL, Cook V, Goldsmith LJ, Powell J, Hertweck SP. Postpartum contraceptive use among adolescent mothers. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:770-6.
7. Whiteman MK, Cox S, Tepper NK, Curtis K, Jamieson DJ, Penman-Aquilar A, et al. Postpartum intrauterine device insertion and postpartum sterilization in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:127.e1-7.
8. Eroglu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, Dilbaz B, Akin A, Taskin L, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up. Contraception 2006;74:376-81.
9. El-Shafei MM, Mashali A, Hassan EO, El-Boghdadi L, El-Lakkany N. Postpartum and postabortion intrauterine device insertion unmet needs of safe reproductive health: three years experience of a Mansoura University Hospital. J Egypt Soc Obstet Gynecol 2000;26:253-62.
10. Ricalde RL, Tobias GM, Perez CR, Ramirez NV. Random comparative study between intrauterine device multiload Cu375 and TCu 380A inserted in the postpartum period. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2006;74:306-11.
11. Bonilla Rosales F, Aguilar Zamudio ME, Cazares Montero ML, Hernandez Ortiz ME, Luna Ruiz MA. Factors for expulsion of intrauterine device TCu380A applied immediately postpartum and after a delayed period. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2005;43:5-10.
12. Celen S, Moroy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danisman N. Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception 2004;69:279-82.
13. Dahlke JD, Terpstra ER, Ramseyer AM, Busch JM, Rieg T, Magann EF. Postpartum insertion of levonorgestrel-intrauterine system at three time periods: a prospective randomized pilot study. Contraception 2011;84:244-8.
14. Grimes D, Schulz K, van Vliet H, Stanwood N. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD0030.
15. Trussell J, Lalla AM, Doan QV, Reyes E, Pinto L, Gricar J. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2009;79:5-14.
16. Sonnenberg FA, Burkman RT, Hagerty CG, Speroff L, Speroff T. Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods. Contraception 2004;69:447-59.
17. Piejko E. The postpartum visit - why wait 6 weeks? Aust Fam Physician 2006;35:674-8.
18. Tsai PJ, Nakashima L, Yamamoto J, Ngo L, Kaneshiro B. Postpartum follow-up rates before and after the postpartum follow-up initiative at Queen Emma Clinic. Hawaii Med J 2011;70:56-9.
19. Ventura SJ, Curtain SC, Abma JC, Henshaw SK. Estimated pregnancy rates and rates of pregnancy outcomes for the United States, 1990-2008. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol. 60, no. 7. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
20. Tocce K, Sheeder J, Python J, Teal SB. Long acting reversible contraception in postpartum adolescents: early initiation of etonogesterl implant is superior to IUDs in the outpatient setting. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2012;24:59-63.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ectopic pregnancy - United States, 1990-1992. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995;44:46-8.
22. Drug topics red book. Montvale, New Jersey: Thomson Healthcare; 2010.
23. Jerman J, Jones R. Secondary measures of access to abortion services in the united states, 2011 and 2012: gestational age limits, cost, and harassment. Womens Health Issues 2014;24:e419-24.
24. Lecuru F, Robin F, Chasset S, Leonard F, Guitti S, Taurelle R. Direct cost of single dose methotrexate for unruptured ectopic pregnancy. Prospective comparison with laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;88:1-6.
25. Morlock RJ, Lafata JE, Eisenstein D. Cost-effectiveness of single-dose methotrexate compared with laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:407-12.
26. Hoover KW, Tao G, Kent CK. Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:495-502.
27. March of Dimes. The healthcare costs of having a baby. Available at: www.marchofdimes.com/aboutus/14817-25927.asp. Last accessed October 24, 2014.
28. O'Neil-Callahan M, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura G. Twenty-four month continuation of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1083-91.