Communicating tobacco product harm: Compared to what?

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 52, Issue , 2016, Pages 123-125

  Kaufman, Annette R ^a   Suls, Jerry M ^a   Klein, William M P ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; MARKETING; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; TOBACCO; DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PROCEDURES; RISK; SMOKING;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; MARKETING; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK; SMOKING; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 84947038336     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: 18736327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.039     Document Type: Note

References (27)

1. Adkinson S.E., O'Connor R.J., Bansal-Travers M., et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2013, 44:207-215.
2. Ayo-Yusuf O.A., Burns D.M. The complexity of 'harm reduction' with smokeless tobacco as an approach to tobacco control in low-income and middle-income countries. Tobacco Control 2012, 21:245-251.
3. British American Tobacco Harm reduction: The opportunity (Accessed September 18, 2014). http://www.bat.com/harmreduction.
4. Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids The risk continuum of tobacco products (Published 2010. Accessed October 10, 2014). http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/content/ctfk/ht_tools2013/OK%20riskcontinuumandendorsement%2010-03-12.pdf.
5. Choi K., Forster J. Awareness, perceptions and use of snus among young adults from the upper Midwest region of the USA. Tobacco Control 2011, 22:412-417.
6. Corey C., Wang B., Johnson S.E., et al. Notes from the field: Electronic cigarette use among middle and high school students-United States, 2011-2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2013, 62:729-730.
7. Dhar R., Simonson I. The effect of the focus of comparison on consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research 1992, XXIX:430-440.
8. Gregan-Paxton J., John D.R. Consumer learning by analogy: A model of internal knowledge transfer. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1997, 24:266-284.
9. Hsee C.K., Leclerc F. Will products look more attractive when presented separately or together?. Journal of Consumer Research 1998, 25:175-186.
10. Hsee C.K., Zhang J. Distinction bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 85:680-695.
11. Huber J., Payne J.W., Puto C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research 1982, 9:90-98.
12. Klein N.H., Oglethorpe J.E. Cognitive reference points in consumer decision making. NA-Advances in Consumer Research 1987, 14:183-197. Association for Consumer Research. M. Wallendorf, P. Anderson (Eds.).
13. Kruger J., Vargas P. Consumer confusion of percent differences. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2008, 18:49-61.
14. Markman A.B., Loewenstein J. Structural comparison and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2010, 20:126-137.
15. Overland S., Hetland J., Aaro L.E. Relative harm of snus and cigarettes: what do Norwegian adolescents say?. Tobacco Control 2008, 17:422-425.
16. Parascandola M. Tobacco harm reduction and the evolution of nicotine dependence. American Journal of Public Health 2011, 101:632-641.
17. Popova L., Ling P. Perceptions of relative risk of snus and cigarettes among US smokers. American Journal of Public Health 2013, 103(11):e21-e23.
18. Regan A.K., Promoff G., Dube S.R., et al. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the 'e-cigarette' in the USA. Tobacco Control 2013, 22:19-23.
19. Reynolds R.J., Reduction Harm (Accessed September 18, 2014). http://www.rjrt.com/harmrdtn.aspx.
20. Simonson I. Will I, like a "medium" pillow? Another look at constructed and inherent preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology 2008, 18:155-169.
21. Snyder R. Comparative advertising and brand evaluation: Toward developing a categorization approach. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1992, 1:15-30.
22. Strack F., Mussweiler T. Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997, 73:437-446.
23. Tomar S.L., Alpert H.R., Connolly G.N. Patterns of dual use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products among US males: Findings from national surveys. Tobacco Control 2010, 19:104-109.
24. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review 1977, 84:327-338.
25. Visschers V.H.M., Meertens R.M., Passchier W.F., et al. How does the general public evaluate risk information? The impact of associations with other risks. Risk Analysis 2007, 27:715-727.
26. Wood W., Witt M.G., Tam L. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 88:918-933.
27. Zeller M., Hatsukami D., Strategic dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction Group The strategic dialogue on tobacco harm reduction: A vision and blueprint for action in the United States. Tobacco Control 2008, 18:324-332.