Interplay and characterization of Dark Matter searches at colliders and in direct detection experiments

Physics of the Dark Universe

Volumn 9-10, Issue , 2015, Pages 51-58

  Malik, Sarah A ^a   McCabe, Christopher ^b,c   Araujo, Henrique ^a   Belyaev, Alexander ^d,e   Bœhm, Céline ^b   Brooke, Jim ^f   Buchmueller, Oliver ^a   Davies, Gavin ^a   De Roeck, Albert ^g,h   de Vries, Kees ^a   Dolan, Matthew J ⁱ   Ellis, John ^g,j   Fairbairn, Malcolm ^j   Flaecher, Henning ^f   Gouskos, Loukas ^k   Khoze, Valentin V ^b   Landsberg, Greg ^l   Newbold, Dave ^f   Papucci, Michele ^m   Sumner, Timothy ^a   Thomas, Marc ^d,e   Worm, Steven ^e   more..

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^e Rutherford Appleton Laboratory   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^g CERN   (Switzerland)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

ⁱ SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^j KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^m LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Collider search for Dark Matter; Dark Matter; Direct detection; Simplified models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947031193     PISSN: 22126864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dark.2015.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aprile E., et al. The XENON100 dark matter experiment. Astropart. Phys. 2012, 35:573-590. XENON100 Collaboration, arXiv:1107.2155.
2. Akerib D., et al. The large underground xenon (LUX) experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 2013, 704:111-126. LUX Collaboration, arXiv:1211.3788.
3. Boehm C., Fayet P. Scalar dark matter candidates. Nucl. Phys. B 2004, 683:219-263. (see Section 9.6) http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/0305261[hep-ph/0305261].
4. Cao Q.-H., Chen C.-R., Li C.S., Zhang H. Effective dark matter model: relic density, CDMS II, fermi LAT and LHC. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 1108:018. arXiv:0912.4511.
5. Beltran M., Hooper D., Kolb E.W., Krusberg Z.A., Tait T.M. Maverick dark matter at colliders. J. High Energy Phys. 2010, 1009:037. arXiv:1002.4137.
6. Goodman J., Ibe M., Rajaraman A., Shepherd W., Tait T.M., et al. Constraints on light majorana dark matter from colliders. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 695:185-188. arXiv:1005.1286.
7. Bai Y., Fox P.J., Harnik R. The tevatron at the frontier of dark matter direct detection. J. High Energy Phys. 2010, 1012:048. arXiv:1005.3797.
8. Goodman J., Ibe M., Rajaraman A., Shepherd W., Tait T.M., et al. Constraints on dark matter from colliders. Phys. Rev. D 2010, 82:116010. arXiv:1008.1783.
9. Rajaraman A., Shepherd W., Tait T.M., Wijangco A.M. LHC bounds on interactions of dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84:095013. arXiv:1108.1196.
10. Fox P.J., Harnik R., Kopp J., Tsai Y. Missing energy signatures of dark matter at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 85:056011. arXiv:1109.4398.
11. Arkani-Hamed N., Dimopoulos S., Dvali G. The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter. Phys. Lett. B 1998, 429:263-272. hep-ph/9803315.
12. Georgi H. Unparticle physics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98:221601. hep-ph/0703260.
13. J. Goodman, W. Shepherd, LHC bounds on UV-complete models of dark matter, . http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1111.2359.
14. Shoemaker I.M., Vecchi L. Unitarity and monojet bounds on models for DAMA, CoGeNT, and CRESST-II. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86:015023. arXiv:1112.5457.
15. Buchmueller O., Dolan M.J., McCabe C. Beyond effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 1401:025. arXiv:1308.6799.
16. Busoni G., De Simone A., Morgante E., Riotto A. On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 2014, 728:412-421. arXiv:1307.2253.
17. Busoni G., De Simone A., Gramling J., Morgante E., Riotto A. On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC, Part II: complete analysis for the s-channel. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014, 1406:060. arXiv:1402.1275.
18. Busoni G., De Simone A., Jacques T., Morgante E., Riotto A. On the validity of the effective field theory for dark matter searches at the LHC part III: Analysis for the t-channel. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014, 1409:022. arXiv:1405.3101.
19. ' dark force at colliders. J. High Energy Phys. 2012, 1207:182. arXiv:1202.2894.
20. Frandsen M.T., Kahlhoefer F., Preston A., Sarkar S., Schmidt-Hoberg K. LHC and tevatron bounds on the dark matter direct detection cross-section for vector mediators. J. High Energy Phys. 2012, 1207:123. arXiv:1204.3839.
21. Dreiner H., Schmeier D., Tattersall J. Contact interactions probe effective dark matter models at the LHC. Europhys. Lett. 2013, 102:51001. arXiv:1303.3348.
22. Chang S., Edezhath R., Hutchinson J., Luty M. Effective WIMPs. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89:015011. arXiv:1307.8120.
23. An H., Wang L.-T., Zhang H. Dark matter with t-channel mediator: a simple step beyond contact interaction. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89:115014. arXiv:1308.0592.
24. Bai Y., Berger J. Fermion portal dark matter. J. High Energy Phys. 2013, 1311:171. arXiv:1308.0612.
25. DiFranzo A., Nagao K.I., Rajaraman A., Tait T.M.P. Simplified models for dark matter interacting with quarks. J. High Energy Phys. 2013, 1311:014. arXiv:1308.2679.
26. Papucci M., Vichi A., Zurek K.M. Monojet versus the rest of the world I: t-channel models. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 1411:024. arXiv:1402.2285.
27. Agenda of the May 29th, 2014 Brainstorming Workshop, 2014. http://www.hep.ph.ic.ac.uk/TeraUniverse/meetings/20140529_Brainstorming/Brainstorming-Worksop-DM-May292014-Imperial.pdf.
28. J. Abdallah, A. Ashkenazi, A. Boveia, G. Busoni, A. De Simone, et al., Simplified Models for Dark Matter and Missing Energy Searches at the LHC, . http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1409.2893.
29. Buchmueller O., Dolan M.J., Malik S.A., McCabe C. Characterising dark matter searches at colliders and direct detection experiments: vector mediators. J. High Energy Phys. 2015, 1501:037. arXiv:1407.8257.
30. Alwall J., Schuster P., Toro N. Simplified models for a first characterization of new physics at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 79:075020. arXiv:0810.3921.
31. Alves D., et al. Simplified models for LHC new physics searches. J. Phys. G 2012, 39:105005. LHC New Physics Working Group Collaboration, arXiv:1105.2838.
32. Haisch U., Kahlhoefer F., Re E. QCD effects in mono-jet searches for dark matter. J. High Energy Phys. 2013, 1312:007. arXiv:1310.4491.
33. Nason P. A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms. J. High Energy Phys. 2004, 0411:040. hep-ph/0409146.
34. Frixione S., Nason P., Oleari C. Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method. J. High Energy Phys. 2007, 0711:070. arXiv:0709.2092.
35. Alioli S., Nason P., Oleari C., Re E. A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX. J. High Energy Phys. 2010, 1006:043. arXiv:1002.2581.
36. Sjostrand T., Mrenna S., Skands P.Z. A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1. Comput. Phys. Comm. 2008, 178:852-867. arXiv:0710.3820.
37. Sjostrand T., Mrenna S., Skands P.Z. PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual. J. High Energy Phys. 2006, 0605:026. hep-ph/0603175.
38. de Favereau J., et al. DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 1402:057. DELPHES 3 Collaboration, arXiv:1307.6346.
39. S. Ovyn, X. Rouby, V. Lemaitre, DELPHES, a framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, . http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/0903.2225.
40. Haisch U., Hibbs A., Re E. Determining the structure of dark-matter couplings at the LHC. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89(3):034009. arXiv:1311.7131.
41. CMS Collaboration, Search for new physics in monojet events in pp collisions at sqrt(s)=8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-048, 2013.
42. Khachatryan V., et al. Search for dark matter, extra dimensions, and unparticles in monojet events in proton-proton collisions at sqrt(s)=8TeV. Eur. Phys. J. 2015, C75:5, 235. CMS Collaboration, Supersedes CMS-EXO-12-048. 10.1140/epjc/s10052-015-3451-4.
43. Akerib D., et al. First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the sanford underground research facility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112:091303. LUX Collaboration, arXiv:1310.8214.
44. Agnese R., et al. Search for low-mass WIMPs with SuperCDMS. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 112:241302. SuperCDMS Collaboration, arXiv:1402.7137.
45. D. Malling, D. Akerib, H. Araujo, X. Bai, S. Bedikian, et al., After LUX: The LZ Program, . http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1110.0103.
46. XENON1T Collaboration, E. Aprile, et al., Conceptual design and simulation of a water cherenkov muon veto for the XENON1T experiment, . http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1406.2374.
47. Baudis L. DARWIN: dark matter WIMP search with noble liquids. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2012, 375:012028. DARWIN Collaboration, arXiv:1201.2402.
48. Schumann M., Baudis L., Butikofer L., Kish A., Selvi M. Dark matter sensitivity of multi-ton liquid xenon detectors. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2015, 10:016. arXiv:1506.08309.
49. Billard J., Strigari L., Figueroa-Feliciano E. Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89:023524. arXiv:1307.5458.
50. M. Pyle, Uploaded to DMTools, 9/20/2013, . http://dmtools.brown.edu.
51. Buckley M.R., Feld D., Goncalves D. Scalar simplified models for dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91(1):015017. arXiv:1410.6497.
52. P. Harris, V.V. Khoze, M. Spannowsky, C. Williams, Constraining Dark Sectors at Colliders: Beyond the Effective Theory Approach, . http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1411.0535.
53. U. Haisch, E. Re, Simplified dark matter top-quark interactions at the LHC, in press, . arxiv:1503.00691.
54. O. Buchmueller, S.A. Malik, C. McCabe, B. Penning, Constraining the Fermi-LAT excess with multi-jet plus MET collider searches, in press, . arxiv:1505.07826.
55. Boehm C., Fayet P. Scalar dark matter candidates. Nucl. Phys. B 2004, 683:219-263. hep-ph/0305261.
56. Hambye T., Strumia A. Dynamical generation of the weak and dark matter scale. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88:055022. arXiv:1306.2329.
57. Khoze V.V., McCabe C., Ro G. Higgs vacuum stability from the dark matter portal. J. High Energy Phys. 2014, 1408:026. arXiv:1403.4953.