Simplified models for dark matter interacting with quarks

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  DiFranzo, Anthony ^a   Nagao, Keiko I ^b,c   Rajaraman, Arvind ^a   Tait, Tim M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HIGH ENERGY ACCELERATOR RESEARCH ORGANIZATION KEK   (Japan)

^c NIIHAMA NATIONAL COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; Cosmology of theories beyond the SM; Phenomenological models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892421578     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2013)014     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. D. Bauer et al., Dark Matter in the Coming Decade: Complementary Paths to Discovery and Beyond, arXiv:1305.1605 [INSPIRE].
2. M. Cahill-Rowley et al., Complementarity and Searches for Dark Matter in the pMSSM, arXiv:1305.6921 [INSPIRE].
3. LHC NEW PHYSICS WORKING GROUP collaboration, D. Alves et al., Simplified Models for LHC New Physics Searches, J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 105005 [arXiv:1105.2838] [INSPIRE].
4. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb, Z.A. Krusberg and T.M. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP 09 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1002.4137] [INSPIRE].
5. Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, C.S. Li and H. Zhang, Effective Dark Matter Model: Relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC, JHEP 08 (2011) 018 [arXiv:0912.4511] [INSPIRE].
6. J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M. Tait and H.-B. Yu, Constraints on Light Majorana dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [INSPIRE].
7. Y. Bai, P.J. Fox and R. Harnik, The Tevatron at the Frontier of Dark Matter Direct Detection, JHEP 12 (2010) 048 [arXiv:1005.3797] [INSPIRE].
8. J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M. Tait and H.-B. Yu, Constraints on Dark Matter from Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
9. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, LEP Shines Light on Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 014028 [arXiv:1103.0240] [INSPIRE].
10. A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, LHC Bounds on Interactions of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 095013 [arXiv:1108.1196] [INSPIRE].
11. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, J. Kopp and Y. Tsai, Missing Energy Signatures of Dark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 056011 [arXiv:1109.4398] [INSPIRE].
12. P.J. Fox, R. Harnik, R. Primulando and C.-T. Yu, Taking a Razor to Dark Matter Parameter Space at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015010 [arXiv:1203.1662] [INSPIRE].
13. J.-F. Fortin and T.M. Tait, Collider Constraints on Dipole-Interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 063506 [arXiv:1103.3289] [INSPIRE].
14. Y. Bai and T.M. Tait, Searches with Mono-Leptons, Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 384 [arXiv:1208.4361] [INSPIRE].
15. R. Ding and Y. Liao, Spin 3=2 Particle as a Dark Matter Candidate: an Effective Field Theory Approach, JHEP 04 (2012) 054 [arXiv:1201.0506] [INSPIRE].
16. R. Cotta, J. Hewett, M. Le and T. Rizzo, Bounds on Dark Matter Interactions with Electroweak Gauge Bosons, arXiv:1210.0525 [INSPIRE].
17. H. Dreiner, D. Schmeier and J. Tattersall, Contact Interactions Probe Effective Dark Matter Models at the LHC, Europhys. Lett. 102 (2013) 51001 [arXiv:1303.3348] [INSPIRE].
18. L.M. Carpenter, A. Nelson, C. Shimmin, T.M. Tait and D. Whiteson, Collider searches for dark matter in events with a Z boson and missing energy, arXiv:1212.3352 [INSPIRE].
19. Z.-H. Yu, Q.-S. Yan and P.-F. Yin, Detecting interactions between dark matter and photons at high energy e+e- colliders, arXiv:1307.5740 [INSPIRE].
20. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb and Z.C. Krusberg, Deducing the nature of dark matter from direct and indirect detection experiments in the absence of collider signatures of new physics, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 043509 [arXiv:0808.3384] [INSPIRE].
21. A. Kurylov and M. Kamionkowski, Generalized analysis of weakly interacting massive particle searches, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 063503 [hep-ph/0307185] [INSPIRE].
22. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng, Y.-L.S. Tsai and T.-C. Yuan, Global Constraints on Effective Dark Matter Interactions: Relic Density, Direct Detection, Indirect Detection and Collider, JCAP 05 (2012) 001 [arXiv:1201.3402] [INSPIRE].
23. J. Goodman, M. Ibe, A. Rajaraman, W. Shepherd, T.M. Tait and H.-B. Yu, Gamma Ray Line Constraints on Effective Theories of Dark Matter, Nucl. Phys. B 844 (2011) 55 [arXiv:1009.0008] [INSPIRE].
24. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng and T.-C. Yuan, Cosmic Antiproton Constraints on Effective Interactions of the Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2011) 004 [arXiv:1011.2310] [INSPIRE].
25. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng and T.-C. Yuan, Gamma-ray Constraints on Effective Interactions of the Dark Matter, JCAP 06 (2011) 023 [arXiv:1104.5329] [INSPIRE].
26. A. Rajaraman, T.M. Tait and D. Whiteson, Two Lines or Not Two Lines? That is the Question of Gamma Ray Spectra, JCAP 09 (2012) 003 [arXiv:1205.4723] [INSPIRE].
27. A. Rajaraman, T.M. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, Effective Theories of Gamma-ray Lines from Dark Matter Annihilation, Phys. Dark Univ. 2 (2013) 17 [arXiv:1211.7061] [INSPIRE].
28. A. De Simone, A. Monin, A. Thamm and A. Urbano, On the effective operators for Dark Matter annihilations, JCAP 02 (2013) 039 [arXiv:1301.1486] [INSPIRE].
29. J.-M. Zheng, Z.-H. Yu, J.-W. Shao, X.-J. Bi, Z. Li et al., Constraining the interaction strength between dark matter and visible matter: I. fermionic dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 350 [arXiv:1012.2022] [INSPIRE].
30. B. Bellazzini, M. Cliche and P. Tanedo, The Effective Theory of Self-Interacting Dark Matter, arXiv:1307.1129 [INSPIRE].
31. I.M. Shoemaker, Constraints on Dark Matter Protohalos in Effective Theories and Neutrinophilic Dark Matter, arXiv:1305.1936 [INSPIRE].
32. P. Gondolo, J. Hisano and K. Kadota, The effect of quark interactions on dark matter kinetic decoupling and the mass of the smallest dark halos, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083523 [arXiv:1205.1914] [INSPIRE].
33. J.M. Cornell, S. Profumo and W. Shepherd, Kinetic Decoupling and Small-Scale Structure in Effective Theories of Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 015027 [arXiv:1305.4676] [INSPIRE].
34. J. Goodman and W. Shepherd, LHC Bounds on UV-Complete Models of Dark Matter, arXiv:1111.2359 [INSPIRE].
35. M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Direct detection of dark matter in models with a light Z′, JHEP 09 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1107.2118] [INSPIRE].
36. I.M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, Unitarity and Monojet Bounds on Models for DAMA, CoGeNT and CRESST-II, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 015023 [arXiv:1112.5457] [INSPIRE].
37. H. An, X. Ji and L.-T. Wang, Light Dark Matter and Z 0 Dark Force at Colliders, JHEP 07 (2012) 182 [arXiv:1202.2894] [INSPIRE].
38. M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, A. Preston, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, LHC and Tevatron Bounds on the Dark Matter Direct Detection Cross-Section for Vector Mediators, JHEP 07 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1204.3839] [INSPIRE].
39. G. Busoni, A. De Simone, E. Morgante and A. Riotto, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC, arXiv:1307.2253 [INSPIRE].
40. R.C. Cotta, A. Rajaraman, T.M.P. Tait and A.M. Wijangco, Particle Physics Implications and Constraints on Dark Matter Interpretations of the CDMS Signal, arXiv:1305.6609 [INSPIRE].
41. S. Profumo, W. Shepherd and T. Tait, The Pitfalls of Dark Crossings, arXiv:1307.6277 [INSPIRE].
42. Y. Gershtein, F. Petriello, S. Quackenbush and K.M. Zurek, Discovering hidden sectors with mono-photon Z′ searches, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 095002 [arXiv:0809.2849] [INSPIRE].
43. F.J. Petriello, S. Quackenbush and K.M. Zurek, The invisible Z 0 at the CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 115020 [arXiv:0803.4005] [INSPIRE].
44. P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko, C. Kilic and R.K. Mishra, A Classification of Dark Matter Candidates with Primarily Spin-Dependent Interactions with Matter, arXiv:1003.1912 [INSPIRE].
45. M. Garny, A. Ibarra, M. Pato and S. Vogl, Closing in on mass-degenerate dark matter scenarios with antiprotons and direct detection, JCAP 11 (2012) 017 [arXiv:1207.1431] [INSPIRE].
46. G. D'Ambrosio, G. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
47. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in final states with missing transverse energy and 0, 1, 2, 3, or at least 4 b-quark jets in 8TeV pp collisions using the variable AlphaT, CMS-PAS-SUS-12-028.
48. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
49. N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules - Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].
50. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker and M. Spira, PROSPINO: A program for the production of supersymmetric particles in next-to-leading order QCD, hep-ph/9611232 [INSPIRE].
51. J.F. Nieves and P.B. Pal, Generalized Fierz identities, Am. J. Phys. 72 (2004) 1100 [hep-ph/0306087] [INSPIRE].
52. M. Freytsis and Z. Ligeti, On dark matter models with uniquely spin-dependent detection possibilities, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 115009 [arXiv:1012.5317] [INSPIRE].
53. P. Gondolo, J. Edsjo, P. Ullio, L. Bergstrom, M. Schelke and E.A. Baltz, DarkSUSY: Computing supersymmetric dark matter properties numerically, JCAP 07 (2004) 008 [astro-ph/0406204] [INSPIRE].
54. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 181301 [arXiv:1207.5988] [INSPIRE].
55. XENON10 collaboration, J. Angle et al., A search for light dark matter in XENON10 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 051301 [arXiv:1104.3088] [INSPIRE].
56. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 021301 [arXiv:1301.6620] [INSPIRE].
57. 19F from PICASSO, Phys. Lett. B 711 (2012) 153 [arXiv:1202.1240] [INSPIRE].
58. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs3.1: a program for calculating dark matter observables, arXiv:1305.0237 [INSPIRE].
59. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, arXiv:1307.8120 [INSPIRE].
60. H. An, L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang, Dark matter with t-channel mediator: a simple step beyond contact interaction, arXiv:1308.0592 [INSPIRE].
61. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion Portal Dark Matter, arXiv:1308.0612 [INSPIRE].