Higgs vacuum stability from the dark matter portal

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 8, 2014, Pages

  Khoze, Valentin V ^a   McCabe, Christopher ^a   Ro, Gunnar ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84919882601     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2014)026     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg, Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev.D 7 (1973) 1888 [INSPIRE].
4. K.A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Conformal symmetry and the Standard Model, Phys. Lett.B 648 (2007) 312 [hep-th/0612165] [INSPIRE].
5. C. Englert, J. Jaeckel, V.V. Khoze and M. Spannowsky, Emergence of the electroweak scale through the Higgs portal, JHEP04 (2013) 060 [arXiv:1301.4224] [INSPIRE].
6. V.V. Khoze and G. Ro, Leptogenesis and neutrino oscillations in the classically conformal Standard Model with the Higgs portal, JHEP10 (2013) 075 [arXiv:1307.3764] [INSPIRE].
7. −L extended Standard Model, Phys. Lett.B 676 (2009) 81 [arXiv:0902.4050] [INSPIRE].
8. T. Hambye and A. Strumia, Dynamical generation of the weak and dark matter scale, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055022 [arXiv:1306.2329] [INSPIRE].
9. C.D. Carone and R. Ramos, Classical scale-invariance, the electroweak scale and vector dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055020 [arXiv:1307.8428] [INSPIRE].
10. V.V. Khoze, Inflation and dark matter in the Higgs portal of classically scale invariant Standard Model, JHEP11 (2013) 215 [arXiv:1308.6338] [INSPIRE].
11. R. Hempfling, The next-to-minimal Coleman-Weinberg model, Phys. Lett.B 379 (1996) 153 [hep-ph/9604278] [INSPIRE].
12. W.A. Bardeen, On naturalness in the Standard Model, FERMILAB-CONF-95-391, Fermilab, Batavia U.S.A. (1995).
13. smodel, Phys. Rev.D 75 (2007) 115016 [hep-ph/0701254] [INSPIRE].
14. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, K. McDonald and R. Volkas, Neutrino mass in radiatively-broken scale-invariant models, Phys. Rev.D 76 (2007) 075014 [arXiv:0706.1829] [INSPIRE].
15. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, K.L. McDonald and R.R. Volkas, A solution to the hierarchy problem from an almost decoupled hidden sector within a classically scale invariant theory, Phys. Rev.D 77 (2008) 035006 [arXiv:0709.2750] [INSPIRE].
16. M. Holthausen, M. Lindner and M.A. Schmidt, Radiative symmetry breaking of the minimal left-right symmetric model, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 055002 [arXiv:0911.0710] [INSPIRE].
17. S. Iso and Y. Orikasa, TeV scale B-L model with a flat Higgs potential at the Planck scale — in view of the hierarchy problem, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2013 (2013) 023B08 [arXiv:1210.2848] [INSPIRE].
18. L. Bian, R. Ding and B. Zhu, Two component Higgs-portal dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 728 (2014) 105 [arXiv:1308.3851] [INSPIRE].
19. J. Guo and Z. Kang, Higgs naturalness and dark matter stability by scale invariance, arXiv:1401.5609 [INSPIRE].
20. T. Hambye and M.H.G. Tytgat, Electroweak symmetry breaking induced by dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 659 (2008) 651 [arXiv:0707.0633] [INSPIRE].
21. E. Gabrielli et al., Towards completing the Standard Model: vacuum stability, EWSB and dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015017 [arXiv:1309.6632] [INSPIRE].
22. M. Holthausen, J. Kubo, K.S. Lim and M. Lindner, Electroweak and conformal symmetry breaking by a strongly coupled hidden sector, JHEP12 (2013) 076 [arXiv:1310.4423] [INSPIRE].
23. C.T. Hill, Is the Higgs boson associated with Coleman-Weinberg dynamical symmetry breaking?, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 073003 [arXiv:1401.4185] [INSPIRE].
24. G. Marques Tavares, M. Schmaltz and W. Skiba, Higgs mass naturalness and scale invariance in the UV, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 015009 [arXiv:1308.0025] [INSPIRE].
25. S. Abel and A. Mariotti, Novel Higgs potentials from gauge mediation of exact scale breaking, arXiv:1312.5335 [INSPIRE].
26. M. Quirós, Finite temperature field theory and phase transitions, hep-ph/9901312 [INSPIRE].
27. O. Lebedev, On stability of the electroweak vacuum and the Higgs portal, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2058 [arXiv:1203.0156] [INSPIRE].
28. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, G.F. Giudice, H.M. Lee and A. Strumia, Stabilization of the electroweak vacuum by a scalar threshold effect, JHEP06 (2012) 031 [arXiv:1203.0237] [INSPIRE].
29. R.N. Mohapatra and R.E. Marshak, Local B-L symmetry of electroweak interactions, Majorana neutrinos and neutron oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.44 (1980) 1316 [Erratum ibid.44 (1980) 1643] [INSPIRE].
30. R.E. Marshak and R.N. Mohapatra, Quark-lepton symmetry and B-L as the U(1) generator of the electroweak symmetry group, Phys. Lett.B 91 (1980) 222 [INSPIRE].
31. C. Wetterich, Neutrino masses and the scale of B-L violation, Nucl. Phys.B 187 (1981) 343 [INSPIRE].
32. E.K. Akhmedov, V.A. Rubakov and A.Y. Smirnov, Baryogenesis via neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.81 (1998) 1359 [hep-ph/9803255] [INSPIRE].
33. L. Basso, S. Moretti and G.M. Pruna, A renormalisation group equation study of the scalar sector of the minimal B-L extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 055018 [arXiv:1004.3039] [INSPIRE].
34. D. Buttazzo et al., Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson, JHEP12 (2013) 089 [arXiv:1307.3536] [INSPIRE].
35. G. Degrassi et al., Higgs mass and vacuum stability in the Standard Model at NNLO, JHEP08 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1205.6497] [INSPIRE].
36. M. Sher, Electroweak Higgs potentials and vacuum stability, Phys. Rept.179 (1989) 273 [INSPIRE].
37. M. Lindner, Implications of triviality for the Standard Model, Z. Phys.C 31 (1986) 295 [INSPIRE].
38. M. Gonderinger, Y. Li, H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Vacuum stability, perturbativity and scalar singlet dark matter, JHEP01 (2010) 053 [arXiv:0910.3167] [INSPIRE].
39. O. Lebedev and H.M. Lee, Higgs portal inflation, Eur. Phys. J.C 71 (2011) 1821 [arXiv:1105.2284] [INSPIRE].
40. S.A. Abel, C.-S. Chu, J. Jaeckel and V.V. Khoze, SUSY breaking by a metastable ground state: why the early universe preferred the non-supersymmetric vacuum, JHEP01 (2007) 089 [hep-th/0610334] [INSPIRE].
41. ATLAS collaboration, A particle consistent with the Higgs boson observed with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, Science338 (2012) 1576 [INSPIRE].
42. CMS collaboration, Search for a Standard Model-like Higgs boson with a mass of up to 1 TeV at the LHC, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/Hig12034TWiki, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
43. CMS collaboration, Measurement of the properties of a Higgs boson in the four-lepton final state, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/Hig13002PubTWiki, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2014).
44. −1of pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV with the ATLAS experiment, ATLAS-CONF-2013-017, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
45. CMS collaboration, Search for resonances in the dilepton mass distribution in pp collisions ats$$ \sqrt{s} $$ = 8 TeV, CMS-PAS-EXO-12-061, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
46. T. Hambye, Hidden vector dark matter, JHEP01 (2009) 028 [arXiv:0811.0172] [INSPIRE].
47. T. Hambye and M.H.G. Tytgat, Confined hidden vector dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 683 (2010) 39 [arXiv:0907.1007] [INSPIRE].
48. C. Arina, T. Hambye, A. Ibarra and C. Weniger, Intense gamma-ray lines from hidden vector dark matter decay, JCAP03 (2010) 024 [arXiv:0912.4496] [INSPIRE].
49. J. Evslin and S.B. Gudnason, Dwarf galaxy sized monopoles as dark matter?, arXiv:1202.0560 [INSPIRE].
50. V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar phantoms, Phys. Lett.B 161 (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
51. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 50 (1994) 3637 [hep-ph/0702143] [INSPIRE].
52. C.P. Burgess, M. Pospelov and T. ter Veldhuis, The minimal model of nonbaryonic dark matter: a singlet scalar, Nucl. Phys.B 619 (2001) 709 [hep-ph/0011335] [INSPIRE].
53. Y. Mambrini, Higgs searches and singlet scalar dark matter: combined constraints from XENON100 and the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 115017 [arXiv:1108.0671] [INSPIRE].
54. A. Djouadi, O. Lebedev, Y. Mambrini and J. Quevillon, Implications of LHC searches for Higgs-portal dark matter, Phys. Lett.B 709 (2012) 65 [arXiv:1112.3299] [INSPIRE].
55. I. Low, P. Schwaller, G. Shaughnessy and C.E.M. Wagner, The dark side of the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 015009 [arXiv:1110.4405] [INSPIRE].
56. K. Cheung, Y.-L.S. Tsai, P.-Y. Tseng, T.-C. Yuan and A. Zee, Global study of the simplest scalar phantom dark matter model, JCAP10 (2012) 042 [arXiv:1207.4930] [INSPIRE].
57. J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger, Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055025 [arXiv:1306.4710] [INSPIRE].
58. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, arXiv:1303.5076 [INSPIRE].
59. P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: improved analysis, Nucl. Phys.B 360 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].
60. F. D’Eramo and J. Thaler, Semi-annihilation of dark matter, JHEP06 (2010) 109 [arXiv:1003.5912] [INSPIRE].
61. Nsymmetric scalar dark matter, JCAP04 (2012) 010 [arXiv:1202.2962] [INSPIRE].
62. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 091303 [arXiv:1310.8214] [INSPIRE].
63. P. Cushman et al., Working group report: WIMP dark matter direct detection, arXiv:1310.8327 [INSPIRE].
64. H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting scalar and pseudoscalar couplings with nucleons, JHEP07 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1202.1292] [INSPIRE].