Is Effective Teaching Stable?

Journal of Experimental Education

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 23-47

  Patrick, Helen ^a   Mantzicopoulos, Panayota ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

classroom research; environments; evaluation; instruction; teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84947025995     PISSN: 00220973     EISSN: 19400683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.2014.952398     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Andrejko, L. (2004). Value-added assessment. A view from a practitioner. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29, 7-9.
2. Associated Press. (2012, September 1). Teacher evaluation rule to tax principals' time. The Journal Gazette. Retrieved from http://www. journalgazette. net/article/20120901/NEWS07/120909984/1026/LOCAL04
3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2013). Measures of effective teaching. Retrieved from http://www. metproject. org
4. Brophy, J. (1988). Research on teacher effects: Uses and abuses. Elementary School Journal, 89, 3-21.
5. Brophy, J. (2006). Observational research on generic aspects of classroom teaching. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 755-780). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Brophy, J., Coulter, C. L., Crawford, J., Evertson, C. M., & King, C. E. (1975). Classroom observation scales: Stability across time and context and relationships with student learning gains. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 873-881.
7. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers' communication of differentiet alxpectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365-374.
8. Center on Great Teachers & Leaders. (2013). Guide to evaluation products. Retrieved from http://resource. tqsource. org/ gep/gepsearchresult. aspx
9. Curby, T. W., Grimm, K. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Stability and change in early childhood classroom interactions during the first two hours of a day. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 373-384.
10. Curby, T. W., Stuhlman, M., Grimm, K., Mashburn, A., Chomat-Mooney, L., Downer, J., Pianta, R. C. (2011). Within-day variability in the quality of classroom interactions during third and fifth grade: Implications for children's experiences and conducting classroom observations. Elementary School Journal, 112, 16-37.
11. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
12. Danielson, C. (2013). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument. Princeton, NJ: The Danielson Group.
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2009). Recognizing and enhancing teacher effectiveness. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 8, 1-24.
14. Dee, T., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from Impact. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper.
15. Doherty, K. M., &Jacobs, S. (2013). State of the states 2013. Connect the dots: Using evaluations of teacher effectiveness to inform policy and practice. Retrieved from http://www. nctq. org/dmsStage/State of the States 2013 Using Teacher Evaluations NCTQ Report
16. Duncan, A. (2011, May). Lessons from high-performing countries. Secretary Duncan's remarks at National Center on Education and the Economy National Symposium. Retrieved from hppt://www. ed. gov/news/speeches/ lessons-high-performing-countries
17. Emmer, E. T., & Peck, R. F. (1973). Dimensions of classroom behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 223-240.
18. Gast, D. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
19. Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. D. (2010). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in the behavioral sciences (pp. 199-233). New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Retrieved from http://www. gtlcenter. org/sites/default/files/docs/ EvaluatingTeachEffectiveness. pdf
21. Good, T. L. (1979). Teacher effectiveness in the elementary school. Journal of Teacher Education, 30, 52-64.
22. Grimm, K. J., Curby, T. W., Pianta, R. C., Mashburn, A. J., Downer, J., Chomat-Mooney, L., & Hamre, B. (2008, March). Partitioning variance associated with classroom observations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
23. Haertel, E. H. (2013). Reliability and validity of inferences about teachers based on student test scores. Retrieved from http://www. ets. org/research/policy research reports/angoff
24. Hamre, B. K. (2009, April). Using classroom observation to gauge teacher effectiveness: Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Presentation for the National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality's Evaluating Teacher Effectiveness. Retrieved from http://www. gse. harvard. edu/cepr-resources/files/news-events/ncte-conference-class-hamre. pdf
25. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4, 000 classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 113, 461-487.
26. Hill, H. C. (2009). Evaluating value-added models: A validity argument approach. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 700-709.
27. Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. B., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and theMathematical Quality of Instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430-511.
28. Hill, H. C., Charalambous, C. Y., &Kraft, M. A. (2012). When rater reliability is not enough: Teacher observation systems and a case for the generalizability study. Educational Researcher, 41, 56-64.
29. Ho, A. D., & Kane, T. J. (2013). The reliability of classroom observations by school personnel. Retrieved from http:// www. metproject. org/downloads/MET Reliability%20of%20Classroom%20Observations Research%20Paper. pdf
30. Indiana Department of Education. (2013). RISE evaluation and development system: Evaluator and teacher handbook. Version 2. 0. Retrieved from http://www. riseindiana. org/sites/default/files/files/RISE%20Handbook%202% 200%20final(4). pdf
31. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
32. Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T., &Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? Seattle, WA: Bill& Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from http://www. metproject. org/downloads/MET Validating Using Random Assignment Research Paper. pdf
33. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2002). The promise and pitfalls of using imprecise school accountability measures. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 91-114.
34. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Seattle, WA:Bill&Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from http://www. metproject. org/downloads/MET Gathering Feedback Research Paper. pdf
35. Kimball, S. M., & Milanowski, A. (2009). Examining teacher evaluation validity and leadership decision-making within a standards-based evaluation system. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 34-70.
36. Kupermintz, H. (2003). Teacher effects and teacher effectiveness: A validity investigation of the Tennessee Value Added Assessment System. Educationet alvaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 287-298.
37. Lavigne, A. L., & Good, T. L. (2014). Teacher and student evaluation: Moving beyond the failure of school reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
38. Lenz, A. S. (2013). Calculating effect size in single-case research: A comparison of nonoverlap methods. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 46, 64-73.
39. Little, O., Goe, L., & Bell, C. (2009). A practical guide to evaluating teacher effectiveness. Retrieved from http:// www. gtlcenter. org/sites/default/files/docs/practicalGuide. pdf
40. Malmberg, L., Hagger, H., Burn, K., Mutton, T., & Colls, H. (2010). Observed classroom quality during teacher education and two years of professional practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 916-932.
41. Mangiante, E. M. S. (2011). Teachers matter: Measures of teacher effectiveness in low-income minority schools. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 23, 41-63.
42. Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2013). Science literacy in school and home contexts: Kindergarteners' science achievement and motivation. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 62-119.
43. Mantzicopoulos, P., Samarapungavan, A., &Patrick, H. (2009). "We learn how to predict and be a scientist:" Early science experiences and kindergarten children's social meanings about science. Cognition and Instruction, 27, 312-369.
44. Marzano Research Laboratory. (2012). The Marzano Teacher Evaluation Scales. Retrieved from http://marzanoresearch. com/documents/MarzanoTeacherEvaluationScales. pdf
45. Meyer, L. A., Linn, R. L., & Hastings, C. N. (1991). Teacher stability from morning to afternoon and from year to year. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 825-847.
46. Murnane, R. J., & Papay, J. P. (2010). Teachers' views on No Child Left Behind: Support for the principles, concerns about the practices. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 151-166.
47. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1984). A nation at risk: The full account. Cambridge, MA: USA
48. Research. Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S, & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educationet alvaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257.
49. Office of Head Start. (2014). Use of Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS) in Head Start. Retrieved from http://eclkc. ohs. acf. hhs. gov/hslc/sr/quality/class/docs/use-of-class. pdf
50. Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom Assessment Scoring System manual K-3. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
51. Plank, S. B., & Condliffe, B. F. (2013). Pressures of the season: An examination of classroom quality and high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 1152-1182.
52. Popham, W. J. (2005). Can growth ever be beside the point? Educational Leadership, 63, 83-84.
53. Popham, W. J. (2013). Evaluating America's teachers: Mission possible? Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
54. Praetorius, A., Lenske, G., & Helmke, A. (2012). Observer ratings of instructional quality: Do they fulfill what they promise? Learning and Instruction, 22, 387-400.
55. Praetorius, A., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2014). One lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons. Learning and Instruction, 31, 2-12.
56. Rosenshine, B., & Furst, N. (1973). The use of direct observation to study teaching. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
57. Samarapungavan, A., Patrick, H., &Mantzicopoulos, P. (2011). What kindergarten students learn in inquiry-based science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 416-470.
58. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., &Casto, G. (1987). The quantitative synthesis of single-subject research:Methodology and validation. Remedial and Speciet alducation, 8, 24-33.
59. Strong, M., Gargani, J., & Hacifazlioglu, O. (2011). Do we know a successful teacher when we see one? Experiments in the identification of effective teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 367-382.
60. Sullivan, J. P. (2012). A collaborative effort: Peer review and the history of teacher evaluations in Montgomery County, Maryland. Harvard Educational Review, 1, 142-152.
61. Teachstone. (2014). The CLASS tool. Retrieved from http://www. teachstone. com/about-the-class
62. U. S. Department of Education. (2002). The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www2. ed. gov/nclb/overview/intro/execsumm. html
63. U. S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top program: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www2. ed. gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary. pdf
64. U. S. Department of Education. (2011). Fact sheet: Bringing flexibility and focus to education law. Retrieved from http://www. whitehouse. gov/sites/default/files/fact sheet bringing flexibility and focus to education law 0. pdf
65. U. S. Department of Education. (2012). ESEA flexibility: Flexibility to improve student academic achievement and increase the quality of instruction. Retrieved from http://www2. ed. gov/policy/elsec/guid/esea-flexibility/index. html
66. Wiley, C. R. H., Good, T. L., & McCaslin, M. (2008). Comprehensive school reform instructional practices throughout a school year: The role of subject matter, grade level, and time of year. Teachers College Record, 110, 2361-2388.
67. Winters, M. A., & Cowen, J. M. (2013). Who would stay, who would be dismissed? An empirical consideration of value-added teacher retention policies. Educational Researcher, 42, 330-337.