Analysis of grounding accidents caused by human error

Journal of Marine Science and Technology (Taiwan)

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 748-760

  Uʇurlu, Özkan ^a   Yildirim, Umut ^a   Başar, Ersan ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Accident analysis; Grounding accident; Human factor; Marine accident

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; ERRORS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; NAVIGATION CHARTS; SHIPS;

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS; EDUCATION AND TRAINING; INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ORGANIZATIONS; INTERPRETATION ERRORS; MARINE ACCIDENTS; MARITIME ACCIDENTS; NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;

DISASTERS;

EID: 84946824256     PISSN: 10232796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.6119/JMST-015-0615-1     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Akten, N. (2004). Analysis of shipping casualties in the bosphorus. Journal of Navigation 57(3), 345-356.
2. Altuzarra, A., J. M. Moreno-Jiménez and M. Salvador (2007). A bayesian priorization procedure for AHP-group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 182(1), 367-382.
3. Aminbakhsh, S., M. Gunduz and R. Sonmez (2013). Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. Journal of Safety Research 4, 99-105.
4. Anderson, T. K. (2009). Kernel density estimation and K-means clustering to profile road accident hotspots. Accident Analysis & Prevention 41(3), 359-364.
5. Andresen, M., M. Domsch, and A. Cascorbi (2007). Working unusual hours and its relationship to job satisfaction: a study of european maritime pilots. Journal of Labor Research 28(4), 714-734.
6. Antoa, P. and C. G. Soares (2006). Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of ropax vessels. International Journal of Automation and Computing 2, 107-116.
7. Arslan, O. (2009). Quantitative evaluation of precautions on chemical tanker operations. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 87(2), 113-120.
8. Arslan, O. and I. D. Er (2008). SWOT analysis for safer carriage of bulk liquid chemicals in tankers. Journal of Hazardous Materials 154(1-3), 901-913.
9. Arslan, O. and O. Turan (2009). Analytical investigation of marine casualties at the strait of Istanbul with SWOT-AHP method. Maritime Policy & Management 36(2), 131-145.
10. ATSB (2015). Overview of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Retrieved January 29, http://www.atsb.gov.au/about-atsb/overview.aspx
11. Barnett, M. L. (2005). Searching for the root causes of maritime casualties. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 4(2), 131-145.
12. Baulk, S. and L. Reyner (2002). Fatigue In Ferry Crews: A Pilot Study. Seafarers International Research Centre (SIRC). Cardiff, U.K.
13. Bloor, M., D. Pentsov, M. Levi and T. Horlick-Jones (2004). Problems of global governance of seafarers' health and safety. Seafarers International Research Centre (SIRC). Cardiff, U.K.
14. Celik, M. and S. Cebi (2009). Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention 41(1), 66-75.
15. Celik, M., S. M. Lavasani and J. Wang (2010). A risk-based modelling approach to enhance shipping accident investigation. Safety Science 48(1), 18-27.
16. Chan, A. H. S., W. Y. Kwok and V. G. Duffy (2004). Using AHP for determining priority in a safety management system. Industrial Management & Data Systems 104(5), 430-445.
17. Chan, F. T. S. and N. Kumar (2007). Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega 35(4), 417-431.
18. Chauvin, C. and S. Lardjane (2008). Decision making and strategies in an interaction situation: collision avoidance at sea. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 11(4), 259-269.
19. Cheng, C., Y. Chen and T. Li (2011). An AHP method for road traffic safety. Computational sciences and optimization 2011 fourth international joint conference, Yunnan, China, 305-308.
20. Cheng, C. H., K. L. Yang and C. L. Hwang (1999). Evaluating attack helicopters by the AHP based on linguistic variable weight. European Journal of Operational Research 11(2), 423-435.
21. Daʇdeviren, M. and I. Yüksel (2008). Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management. Information Sciences 178(6), 1717-1733.
22. Davy, J. G. and C. K. Noh (2011). A study on educations role in establishing strategies for improving safety at sea. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 27(3), 483-499.
23. Donderi, D. C., R. Mercer, M. B. Hong and D. Skinner (2004). Simulated navigation performance with marine electronic chart and information display systems (ECDIS). Journal of Navigation 57(2), 189-202.
24. Doytchev, D. E. and G. Szwillus (2009). Combining task analysis and fault tree analysis for accident and incident analysis: a case study from Bulgaria. Accident Analysis & Prevention 41(6), 1172-1179.
25. Eliopoulou, E. and A. Papanikolaou (2007). Casualty analysis of large tankers. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 12(4), 240-250.
26. Garcia, R., A. Castanos and I. Irastorza (2011). Progress on security of seafarers in the MLC maritime labour convention. Journal of Maritime Research 8(2), 63-74.
27. Goossens, L. H. J. and C. C. Glansdorp (1998). Operational benefits and risk reduction of marine accidents. Journal of Navigation 51(3), 368-381.
28. Harrald, J. R., T. A. Mazzuchi, J. Spahn, D. R. Van, J. Merrick, S. Shrestha and M. Grabowski (1998). Using system simulation to model the impact of human error in a maritime system. Safety Science 30(1-2), 235-247.
29. Hashemi, R. R., L. A. Le Blanc, C. T. Rucks and A. Shearry (1995). A neural network for transportation safety modeling. Expert Systems with Applications 9(3), 247-256.
30. Hetherington, C., R. Flin and K. Mearns (2006). Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research 37(4), 401-411.
31. IMO (2002). Guidelines for formal saftey (FSA) for use in the IMO rulemaking process. The MSC/Circ. 1023, MEPC/Circ. 392, IMO Publishing, London.
32. IMO (2010). ISM Code and guidelines on implementation of the ISM Code, IMO Publication, London.
33. IMO (2011). STCW including 2010 Manila Amendments STCW Conventions and STCW Code, IMO Publishing, London.
34. IMO (2015). Global integrated shipping information system. Retrieved January 29, http://gisis.imo.org/Public/Default.aspx
35. Jones, B. C., J. Dorrian, M. W. S. Rajaratnam and D. Dawson (2005). Working hours regulations and fatigue in transportation: a comparative analysis. Safety Science 43(4), 225-252.
36. Kilincci, O. and S. A. Onal (2011). Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems with Applications 38(8), 9656-9664.
37. Kim, D. W., J. S. Park and Y. S. Park (2011a). Comparison analysis between the IWRAP and the ES model in Ulsan waterway. Journal of Navigation and Port Research International Edition 35(4), 281-287.
38. Kim, K. K., G. K. Park and J. S. Jeong (2011b). Analysis of marine accident probability in Mokpo waterways. Journal of Navigation and Port Research International Edition 35(9), 729-733.
39. Kose, E., A. C. Dincer and H. F. Durukanoglu (2007). Risk assessment of fishing vessels. Journal of Engineering and Environmental Science 22, 417-428.
40. Lijuan, C. and C. Shinan (2011). An approach of AHP for human factors analysis in the aircraft icing accident. Procedia Engineering 17, 63-69.
41. Lu, C. S. and C. L. Tsai (2008). The effects of safety climate on vessel accidents in the container shipping context. Accident Analysis & Prevention 40(2), 594-601.
42. Lynch, M. (2009). Focus on Bridge Resource Management. Department of Ecology State of Washington, Washington.
43. Macrae, C. (2009). Human factors at sea: common patterns of error in groundings and collisions. Maritime Policy & Management 36(1), 21-38.
44. MAIB (2012). Annual Report 2010. Retrieved June 15, http://www.maib.gov.uk/publications/annual-reports/annual-report-2010.cfm.
45. MAIB (2015). An accident, major or serious injury, or hazardous incident? Retrieved January 29, http://www.maib.gov.uk/about-us/index.cfm
46. Martins, M. R. and M. C. Maturana (2010). Human error contribution in collision and grounding of oil tankers. Risk Analysis 30(4), 674-698.
47. Mccarter, P. (1999). STCW '95: Implementation issues-What is the pass mark? Marine Policy 23, 11-24.
48. McNamara, R., A. Collins and V. Matthews (2000). A review of research into fatigue in offshore shipping. Maritime Review, 118-122.
49. Merrick, J. R. W. and J. R. Harrald (2007). Making decisions about safety in us ports and waterways. Interfaces 37(3), 240-252.
50. Mitroussi, K. (2008). Employment of seafarers in the EU context: challenges and opportunities. Marine Policy 32(6), 1043-1049.
51. Moore, W. H. and R. G. Bea (1993). Management of human error in operations of marine systems. Department of Naval Architecture and Offshore Engineering Report, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
52. Mullai, A. and U. Paulsson (2011). A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention 43(4), 1590-1603.
53. O'Neil, W. (2003). The human element in shipping. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 2(2), 95-97.
54. Orosa, J. A., R. Santos and J. A. Pérez (2011). A practical case study of the relationship between work risk prevention and fatigue at work in Spanish merchant ships. Human Factors & Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 21(5), 484-492.
55. Park, Y. S., J. S. Kim and V. Aydogdu (2013). A study on the development the maritime safety assessment model in korea waterway. Journal of Navigation and Port Research 37(6), 567-574.
56. Peters, M. and S. Zelewski (2008). Pitfalls in the application of analytic hierarchy process to performance measurement. Management Decision 46(7), 1039-1051.
57. Pillich, B. and G. Buttgenbach (2001). ECDIS-the intelligent heart of the hazard and collision avoidance system. IEEE 2001, Oakland, CA, 1116-1119.
58. Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science 27(2-3), 183-213.
59. Ronza, A., S. Félez, R. M. Darbra, S. Carol, J. A. Vílchez and J. Casal (2003). Predicting the frequency of accidents in port areas by developing event trees from historical analysis. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 16(6), 551-560.
60. Rothblum, A. R. (2000). Human error and marine safety. The National Safety Council Congress and Expo, Orlando.
61. Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15(3), 234-281.
62. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
63. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 48, 9-26.
64. Saaty, T. L. and L. G. Vargas (2001). Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Springer, New York.
65. Sigua, R.G. and G. D. Aguilar (2003). Maritime incident analysis using GIS. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 5, 778-793.
66. Smith, A., P. Allen, and E. Wadsworth (2006). Seafarer fatigue: the cardiff research programme, Cardiff University Seafarers International Research Centre (SIRC), Cardiff, U.K.
67. Soares, C. G. and A. P. Teixeira (2001). Risk assessment in maritime transporttation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 74(3), 299-309.
68. Størseth, F. and R. K. Tinmannsvik (2012). The critical re-action: Learning from accidents. Safety Science 50, 1977-1982.
69. Swift, A. J. (1993). Bridge team management: A practical guide. The Nautical Institute, Suffolk.
70. Tzannatos, E. (2010). Human element and accidents in greek shipping. Journal of Navigation 63(1), 119-127.
71. Tzannatos, E. and D. Kokotos (2009). Analysis of accidents in Greek shipping during the pre-and post-ISM period. Marine Policy 33(4), 679-684.
72. Uʇurlu, Ö., E. Köse, E. Başar, E. Yüksekyildiz and U. Yildirim (2012). Investigation of working hours of watchkeeping officers on short sea shipping: a case study in an oil tanker. IAME 2012, Taipei.
73. Uʇurlu, Ö., U. Yildirim and E. Yüksekyildiz (2013). Marine accident analysis with GIS. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering 3(12), 21-29.
74. Uʇurlu, Ö., E. Köse, U. Yildirim and E. Yüksekyildiz (2015a). Marine accident analysis for collision and grounding in oil tanker with FTA method. Maritime Policy and Management 42(2), 163-185.
75. Uʇurlu, Ö., S. Erol, and E. Başar (2015b). The analysis of life safety and economic loss in marine accidents occurring in the Turkish Straits. Maritime Policy and Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2014.1000992
76. Uʇurlu, Ö., R. Nişanci, E. Köse, U. Yildirim and E. Yüksekyildiz (2015c). Investigation of oil tanker accidents by using GIS. International Journal Maritime Engineering 157(2), 113-124.
77. Vidal, L. A., F. Marle, and J. C. Bocquet (2011). Using a delphi process and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to evaluate the complexity of projects. Expert Systems with Applications 38(5), 5388-5405.
78. Xi, Y. T., W. J. Chen, Q. G. Fang and S. P. Hu (2010). HFACS model based data mining of human factors-a marine study. The International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Macao, Portegue, 1499-1504.
79. Xi, Y. T., Q. G. Fang, W. J. Chen and S. P. Hu (2009). Case-based HFACS for collecting, classifying and analyzing human errors in marine accidents. The International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Hong Kong, 2148-2153.
80. Wang, W., X. Jiang, S. Xia and Q. Cao (2010). Incident tree model and incident tree analysis method for quantified risk assessment: An in-depth accident study in traffic operation. Safety Science 48(10), 1248-1262.
81. Zang, L. H., Q. Zhu, Y. C. Liu and S. J. Li (2007). A method for automatic routing based on ECDIS. Journal of Dalian Maritime University 33(3), 109-112.
82. Zhang, Y., Y. Zhan and Q. Tan (2009). Studies on human factors in marine engine accident. Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling Conference, Wuhan, China, 134-137.