Psychological factors in cockpit crew selection

Aviation Mental Health: Psychological Implications for Air Transportation

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 161-194

  Roe, Robert A ^a   Hermans, Pieter H ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Zeelenberg Advisory Group   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946779890     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. AGARD (1989). Human performance assessment methods (No. 308). Neuilly-sur-Seine: NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
2. Bartram, D. (1987). The development of an automated testing system for pilot selection: The MICROPAT project. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 36(3-4), 279-298.
3. Bartram, D. (2001). Internet recruitment and selection: Kissing frogs to find princes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 261-274.
4. Bartram, D. (2002). The MICROPAT Pilot Selection Battery: Application of generative techniques for item-based and task-based tests. In Irvine, Sidney H. (ed.); Kyllonen, Patrick C. (ed.). (2002).Item generation for test development. (pp. 317-337). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
5. Bartram, D. & Baxter, P. (1996). Validation of the Cathay Pacific Airways pilot selection program. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 2, 149-169.
6. Berg, J. S., Moore, J. L., Retzlaff, P. D., & King, R. E. (2002). Assessment of personality and crew interaction skills in successful naval aviators. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 73, 6, 575-579.
7. Burke, E., Hobson, C., & Linksy, C. (1997). Large sample validations of three general predictors of pilot training success. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 3, 225-234.
8. Burke, E., Kitching, A., & Valsler, C. (1997). The Pilot Aptitude Tester (PILAPT). On the development and validation of a new computer-based test battery for selecting pilots. In Proceedings of the9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH; 27 April-1 May 1997 (pp. 1286-1291).
9. Butcher, J. N. (1994). Psychological assessment of airline pilot applicants with the MMPI-2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 1, 31-44.
10. Butcher, J. N. (2002). Assessing pilots with “the wrong stuff’: A call for research on emotional health factors in commercial aviators. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 1-2, 168-184.
11. Carretta, T. R. (1989). USAF pilot selection and classification systems. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 60, 1, 46-49.
12. Carretta, T. R. (1992). Short-term retest reliability of an experimental U.S. Air Force pilot candidate selection test battery. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2, 3, 161-173.
13. Carretta, T. R. (1997). Group differences on US Air Force pilot selection tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 5, 2, 115-127.
14. Carretta, T. R. (2000). US air force pilot selection and training methods. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 71, 950-956.
15. Carretta, T. R. & Ree, M. J. (1994). Pilot-candidate selection method: Sources of validity. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 2, 103-117.
16. Carretta, T. R. & Ree, M. J. (2000). General and specific cognitive and psychomotor abilities in personnel selection: The prediction of training and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,8, 4, 227-236.
17. Carretta, T. R. & Ree, M. J. (2003). Pilot selection methods. In M. A. Vidulich & P. S. Tsang (eds.), Principles and practice of aviation psychology. (pp.357-396). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Chapman, D. S. & Rowe, P. M. (2001). The impact of videoconference technology, interview structure, and interviewer gender on interviewer evaluations in the employment interview: A field experiment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 3, 279-298.
19. Chidester, T. R., Helmreich, R. L., Gregorich, S. E., & Geis, C. E. (1991). Pilot personality and crew coordination: Implications for training and selection. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 1, 25-44.
20. Damitz, M., Manzey, D., Kleinmann, M., & Severin, K. (2003). Assessment center for pilot selection: Construct and criterion validity and the impact of assessor type. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52, 2, 193-212.
21. Damos, D. L. (1996). Pilot selection batteries: Shortcomings and perspectives. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 2, 199-209.
22. Dolgin, D. L. & Gibb, G. D. (1989). Personality assessment in aviator selection. In. R. S. Jensen (ed.), Aviation psychology. (pp.288-320). Brookfield, VT: Gower Publishing Co.
23. Fitzgibbons, A., Davis, D., & Schutte, P. C. (2004). Pilot personality profile using the NEO PI-R (No. NASA/TM-204-213237). Hampton, VI: NASA.
24. Grove, W. M. & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 2, 293-323.
25. Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical Versus Mechanical Prediction: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 1, 19-30.
26. Hermans, P. H., Jacobs, M., & Van Niekerk, P. (1987). The Defense Mechanism Test and Success In Flying Training. Paper presented by F. Rameckers at the Conference of the Western European Association for Aviation Psychology WEAAP 1987, Vienna. Later published in: Farmer, E. (ed.) (1991) Proceedings of the XVIII WEAAP Conference. Aldershot: Avebury Aviation.
27. Hermans, P. H. & Mulder, H. W. (1998). Job analysis and the selection interview. In K. M. Goeters (ed.), Aviation Psychology: A Science and a Profession (pp. 81-95). Aldershot: Ashgate.
28. Hermans, P. H., Vlug, T., & Vogelaar, V. (1994). Future City: Job sample for Command & Control, Software & Instruction Manual. Utrecht, Schiphol: PsychoTechniek, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines.
29. Hoermann, H. J. & Maschke, P. (1996). On the relation between personality and job performance of airline pilots. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 2, 171-178.
30. Hofstee, W. K. B. (1983). Selectie: begrip, theorie, procedures & ethiek. Met bijzondere aandacht voor de problemen van personeelsselectie en de positie van de sollicitant. Utrecht: Het Specturm.
31. Hormann, H. J. & Maschke, P. (1996). On the relation between personality and job performance of airline pilots. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 171-178.
32. Hough, L. M. & Ones, D. S. (2002). The structure, measurement, validity, and use of personality variables in industrial, work, and organizational psychology. In (2002) D. S. Ones & N. Anderson (eds.) Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology, Volume 1: Personnel psychology (pp.233-277). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
33. Hunter, D. R. (1989). Aviator selection. In M. F. Wiskoff & G. N. Rampton (eds.), Military personnel measurement (pp. 129-167). New York: Praeger.
34. Hunter, D. R. & Burke, E. F. (1994). Predicting aircraft pilot-training success: A metaanalysis of published research. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 4, 297-313.
35. Jessup, G., & Jessup, H. (1971). Validity of the Eysenck Personality Inventory in pilot selection. Occupational Psychology.
36. Kantor, J. E. & Carretta, T. R. (1988). Aircrew selection systems. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 59, 11, Sect 2, 32-38.
37. Kay, G. G. (1995). CogScreen Aeromedical Edition Professional Manual. Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
38. Latham, G. P. & Saari, L. M. (1984). Do People Do What They Say? Further Studies on the Situational Interview, Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 69, pp. 569): American Psychological Association.
39. Martinussen, M. (1996). Psychological measures as predictors of pilot performance: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 1, 1-20.
40. McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The Validity of Employment Interviews: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis., Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 79, pp. 599-616): American Psychological Association.
41. Mulder, H. W. & Hermans, P. H. (1999). A Unified Personality (Counter-) Indicator and its Usage for Pilot Selection. Internal memo. Utrecht/Rotterdam: SHL Netherlands/Zeelenberg Advisory Group.
42. O’Hare, D. (1997). Cognitive ability determinants of elite pilot performance. Human Factors, 39, 4, 540-552.
43. Roe, R. A. (1989). Designing selectiion procedures. In P. Herriot (ed.), Assessment and selection in organizations (pp. 127-142). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
44. Roe, R. A. (1998). Personnel selection: Principles, models and techniques. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry & C. J. De Wolff (eds.), Handbook of work and organizational psychology - Vol. 3 (pp. 5-32). Hove: Psychology Press.
45. Roe, R. A. (1999). Work performance: A multiple regulation perspective. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 231-335). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
46. Roe, R. A. (2002). Competenties - Een sleutel tot integratie in theorie en praktijk van de A&O-psychologie. Gedrag & Organisatie, 15, 4, 203-224.
47. Roe, R. A. (2004). Are we under- or overcorrecting for restriction of range? Results from a Monte Carlo study of seven correction formulas. Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
48. Roe, R. A. (2005). The design of selection systems: Context, principles, issues. In A. Evers, O. Smit & N. Anderson (eds.), Handbook of personnel selection. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Roozenburg, N. F. M. & Eekels, J. (1998). Productontwerpen, structuur en methoden(2nd edn.). Utrecht: LEMMA.
50. Salgado, J. F. (1997). The five factor model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 30-43.
51. Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., de Fruyt, F., & Rolland, J.-P. (2003). A Meta-Analytic Study of General Mental Ability Validity for Different Occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 6, 1068-1081.
52. Salgado, J. F. & Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the employment interview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 3, 299-324.
53. Sawyer, J. (1966). Measurement and prediction, clinical and statistical. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 3, 178-200.
54. Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. (2003). History, development, evolution, and impact of validity generalization and meta-analysis methods, 1975-2001. In K. R. Murphy (ed.), Validity generalization: A critical review (pp. 31-65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 5, 529-540.
56. Siem, F. M. (1992). Predictive validity of an automated personality inventory for Air Force pilot selection. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2, 261-270.
57. Tett, R. P, Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
58. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection. New York: Wiley.
59. Tier, R. (2004). Aviation and occupational psychology in the Royal Netherlands Air Force. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference of the European Association for Aviation Psychology, Seimbra, Portugal, 3-7 October 2004. (pp. 56-59).
60. Walters, L. C., Miller, M. R., & Ree, M. J. (1993). Structured interviews for pilot selection: No incremental validity. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1, 25-38.
61. Weeks, J. L. & Zelenski, W. E. (1998). Entry to USAF undergraduate flying training (No. AFRL-HE-AZ-TR-1988-0077). Mesa AZ: US Air Force Research Laboratory.
62. Wernimont, R. F. & Campbell, J. (1968). Signs, samples and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372-376.
63. Westerman, R., Draby, D. G., Maruff, P., & Collie, A. (2001). Computer-assisted cognitive function assessment of pilots. ADFHealth, 2, 29-36.
64. Wherry, R. J. (1975). Underprediction from overfitting: 45 years of shrinkage. Personnel Psychology, 28, 1, 1-18.
65. Woychesin, D. E. (2002). Validation of the Canadian Automated Pilot Selection System (CAPSS) against primary flying training results. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 2, 84-91.