Large sample validations of three general predictors of pilot training success

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 225-234

  Burke, Eugene ^a   Hobson, Christian ^b   Linsky, Colin ^b  

^a People Technologies   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; AVIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH; SAMPLE SIZE; SOLDIER; TASK PERFORMANCE; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); UNITED KINGDOM;

AUSTRALIA; AVIATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; MILITARY PERSONNEL; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH; SAMPLE SIZE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TURKEY;

EID: 0031283489     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0703_3     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Individual differences in information processing: An investigation of intellectual abilities and task performance during practice. Intelligence, 10, 101-139.
2. Burke, E. F. (1992, April). On the validity of rather a lot of computerised tests. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society, Scarborough.
3. Burke, E. F. (1993a). Pilot selection in NATO: An overview. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus: Ohio State University.
4. Burke, E. F. (1993b). Validation of RAF computerised pilot selection tests against Turkish Air Force flying screening success (Rep. No. 6/93). London: U.K. Ministry of Defence, Directorate of Science (Air).
5. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic.
6. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomisation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
7. Fitts, P., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks Coleman.
8. Hobson, C., & Burke, E. F. (1993). Pilot test battery: Validation study (Rep. No. 15/93). London: U.K. Ministry of Defence, Directorate of Science (Air).
9. Hunter, D. R., & Burke, E. F. (1987). Computer-based selection in the Royal Air Force. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 243-245.
10. Hunter, D. R., & Burke, E. F. (1994). Predicting aircraft pilot training success: A meta-analysis of published research. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 297-313.
11. Hunter, D. R., & Burke, E. F. (1995). Handbook of pilot selection. Aldershot, England: Avebury Aviation.
12. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990a). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 334-349.
13. Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1990b). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Stead, G. (1991). A validation study of the QANTAS pilot selection process. In E. Farmer (Ed.), Human resource management in aviation (pp. 3-18). Aldershot, England: Avebury Technical.
16. Symonds, C. J., Rejman, M. H., & Burke, E. F. (1994). Historic, financial and pragmatic perspectives in U.K. Army pilot selection. Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the International Military Testing Association. Angers, France: Delegation Generale pour l'armement.
17. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York: Wiley.
18. Whitener, E. M. (1990). Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility limits in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 75-90.