Electronic Medical Record in the Simulation Hospital: Does It Improve Accuracy in Charting Vital Signs, Intake, and Output?

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 166-171

  Mountain, Carel ^a   Redd, Roxanne ^a   O'Leary Kelly, Colleen ^b   Giles, Kim ^c  

^a Shasta College   (United States)

^b SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Shasta College   (United States)

Author keywords

Documentation; EMR; Nurses; Simulation; Students

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; SIMULATION TRAINING; STANDARDS; VITAL SIGN;

EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; NURSING RECORDS; SIMULATION TRAINING; STUDENTS, NURSING; VITAL SIGNS;

EID: 84946707582     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: 15389774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000144     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Institute of Medicine (IOM). The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2010.
2. Kelly T, Brandon D, Docherty S,. Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011; 48 (2): 154-162.
3. Stevenson J, Nilsson G, Petersson G, Johansson P,. Nurses' experience of using electronic patient records in everyday practice in acute/inpatient ward settings: a literature review. Health Inform J. 2010; 16 (1): 63-72.
4. Kossman S, Scheidenhelm S,. Nurses' perception of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. Comput Inform Nurs. 2008; 26 (2): 69-77.
5. Waneka R, Spetz J,. Hospital information technology systems' impact on nurses and nursing care. J Nurs Adm. 2012; 40 (12): 509-514.
6. Gardner C, Jones S,. Utilization of academic electronic medical records in undergraduate nursing education. Online J Nurs Inform. 2012; 16 (2). Available at http://ojni.org/issues/?p=1702. Accessed April 8, 2015.
7. Spencer J,. Integrating informatics in undergraduate nursing curricula: using the QESN framework as a guide. J Nurs Educ. 2012; 51 (12): 697-701.
8. Buckner M, Gregory D,. Point-of-care technology: preserving the caring environment. Crit Care Nurs. 2011; 34 (4): 297-305.
9. Furukawa M, Raghu T, Shao B,. Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from California hospitals, 1998-2007. Health Res Educ Trust. 2010; 45 (4): 941-962.
10. Cronewett L, Sherwood G,. Barnsteiner J, et al. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nurs Outlook. 2007; 55 (3): 122-131.
11. QSEN prelicensure competencies. http://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/#informatics. Accessed May 10, 2014.
12. Lucas L,. Partnering to enhance the nursing curriculum: electronic medical record accessibility. Clin Sim Nurs. 2010; 6 e: 97-e102.
13. Fetter M,. Graduating nurses' self-evaluation of information technology competencies. J Nurs Educ. 2009; 48 (2): 86-90.
14. Mahon P, Nickitas D, Nokes K,. Faculty perceptions of student documentation skills during the transition from paper-based to electronic health records systems. J Nurs Ed. 2010; 49 (11): 615-621.
15. Bensfield L, Olech M, Horsley T,. Simulation for high stakes evaluation in nursing. Nurs Educ. 2012; 37 (2): 71-74.
16. Schoening A, Sittner B, Todd M,. Simulated clinical experience: nursing student's perceptions and the educators' role. Nurs Educ. 2006; 31 (6): 253-258.
17. Ogilvie S, Cragg B, Foulds B,. Perceptions of nursing students on the process and outcomes of a simulation experience. Nurs Educ. 2011; 36 (2): 56-58.
18. Jones C, Richards E,. The impact of nursing students' use of electronic health records in the home setting. Home Health Care Nurse. 2013; 31 (9): 474-548.
19. Green S, Thomas J,. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the electronic medical record. Pediatr Nurs. 2008; 34 (3): 225-240.
20. Bowers A, Kavanagh J, Grogorich T, Shumway J, Yolanda C, Stafford S,. Student nurses and the electronic medical record; a partnership of academia and health care. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011; 29 (12): 692-697.
21. Curry D,. Selection and implementation of a simulated electronic medical record (EMR) in a nursing skills lab. J Educ Technol Syst. 2011; 39 (2): 213-218.
22. Johnson D, Bushey T,. Integrating the academic electronic health record into nursing curriculum: preparing student nurses for practice. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;March: 133-137.
23. California Board of Registered Nursing Preceptor Guidelines. http://www.rn.ca.gov/regulations/title16.shtml#1425. Accessed May 10, 2014.
24. Malette S, Moury S, EnglkeM., Andrews A,. The integrative preceptor model: a new method for teaching undergraduate nursing. Nurs Educ. 2005; 30 (1): 21-26.
25. Traynor M, Gallagher A, Martin L, Smyth S,. From novice to expert: using simulators to enhance practical skill. Br J Nurs. 2010; 19 (22): 1422-1426.
26. National League for Nursing (NLN) position statement: preparing the next generation of nurse to practice in a technology rich environment: an informatics agenda. 2008. http://www.nln.org/aboutnln/positionstatements/informatics-052808.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2014.
27. Hwang J, Park H,. Factors associated with nurses' informatics competency. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011; 29 (4): 256-262.
28. Simmons B,. Clinical reasoning: concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2010; 66 (5): 1151-1158.
29. Gonzol K, Newby C,. Facilitating clinical reasoning in the skills laboratory: reasoning model versus nursing process-based skills checklist. Res Briefs. 2013; 34 (4): 265-267.
30. Carrington J, Effken J,. Strengths and limitations of the electronic health record for documenting clinical events. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011; 29 (6): 360-367.
31. Cipriano P,. The future of nursing and health IT: the quality elixir. Nurs Econ. 2011; 29 (5): 286-289, 282.
32. McBride S, Delaney J, Tietze M,. Health information technology and nursing. Am J Nurs. 2012; 112 (8): 36-41.