Unique organization of extracellular amylases into amylosomes in the resistant starch-utilizing human colonic firmicutes bacterium ruminococcus bromii

mBio

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Ze, Xiaolei ^a   David, Yonit Ben ^b   Laverde Gomez, Jenny A ^a   Dassa, Bareket ^b   Sheridan, Paul O ^a   Duncan, Sylvia H ^a   Louis, Petra ^a   Henrissat, Bernard ^c   Juge, Nathalie ^d   Koropatkin, Nicole M ^e   Bayer, Edward A ^b   Flint, Harry J ^a  

^a ROWETT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^d INSTITUTE OF FOOD RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; AMYLASE 10; AMYLASE 12; AMYLASE 4; AMYLASE 9; COHESIN; FRUCTOSE; HYBRID PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; SCAFFOLD PROTEIN; SCAFFOLDIN PROTEIN 2; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEOME; STARCH;

AMYLOSOME; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY RESOURCE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FIRMICUTES; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEOMICS; RUMINOCOCCUS BROMII; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; RUMINOCOCCUS; SECRETION (PROCESS);

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMYLASES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEOME; RUMINOCOCCUS; STARCH;

EID: 84946606191     PISSN: 21612129     EISSN: 21507511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01058-15     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Caetano M, Antunes L, Finlay BB. 2010. Gut microbiota in health and disease. Physiol Rev 90:859-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00045.2009.
2. Flint HJ, Scott KP, Louis P, Duncan SH, Louis P. 2012. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:577-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2012.156.
3. Cummings JH, Macfarlane GT. 1991. The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon. J Appl Bacteriol 70:443-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb02739.x.
4. Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. 1992. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J Clin Nutr 46(Suppl 2):S33-S50.
5. Robertson MD, Bickerton AS, Dennis AL, Vidal H, Frayn KN. 2005. Insulin-sensitizing effects of dietary resistant starch and effects on skeletal muscle and adipose tissue metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr 82:559-567.
6. Toden S, Bird AR, Topping DL, Conlon MA. 2007. Dose-dependent reduction of dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage by resistant starch in rats correlates more highly with caecal butyrate than with other short chain fatty acids. Cancer Biol Ther 6:253-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cbt.6.2.3627.
7. Reeves AR, Wang GR, Salyers AA. 1997. Characterization of four outer membrane proteins that play a role in utilization of starch by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. J Bacteriol 179:643-649.
8. Martens EC, Koropatkin NM, Smith TJ, Gordon JI. 2009. Complex glycan catabolism by the human gut microbiota: the Bacteroidetes Suslike paradigm. J Biol Chem 284:24673-24677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R109.022848.
9. Flint HJ, Bayer EA, Rincon MT, Lamed R, White BA. 2008. Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:121-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1817.
10. Cameron EA, Maynard MA, Smith CJ, Smith TJ, Koropatkin NM, Martens EC. 2012. Multidomain carbohydrate-binding proteins involved in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron starch metabolism. J Biol Chem 287: 34614-34625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.397380.
11. Ramsay AG, Scott KP, Martin JC, Rincon MT, Flint HJ. 2006. Cellassociated α-amylases of butyrate-producing firmicute bacteria from the human colon. Microbiology 152:3281-3290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.29233-0.
12. Scott KP, Martin JC, Chassard C, Clerget M, Potrykus J, Campbell G, Mayer CD, Young P, Rucklidge G, Ramsay AG, Flint HJ. 2011. Substrate-driven gene expression in Roseburia inulinivorans: importance of inducible enzymes in the utilization of inulin and starch. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(Suppl 1):4672-4679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000091107.
13. Cockburn DW, Orlovsky NI, Foley MH, Kwiatkowski KJ, Bahr CM, Maynard M, Demeler B, Koropatkin NM. 2015. Molecular details of a starch utilization pathway in the human gut symbiont Eubacterium rectale. Mol Microbiol 95:209-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12859.
14. Ze X, Duncan SH, Louis P, Flint HJ. 2012. Ruminococcus bromii is a keystone species for the degradation of resistant starch in the human colon. ISME J 6:1535-1543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.4.
15. Abell GC, Cooke CM, Bennett CN, Conlon MA, McOrist AL. 2008. Phylotypes related to Ruminococcus bromii are abundant in the large bowel of humans and increase in response to a diet high in resistant starch. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 66:505-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00527.x.
16. Walker AW, Ince J, Duncan SH, Webster LM, Holtrop G, Ze X, Brown D, Stares MD, Scott P, Bergerat A, Louis P, McIntosh F, Johnstone AM, Lobley GE, Parkhill J, Flint HJ. 2011. Dominant and diet-responsive groups of bacteria within the human colonic microbiota. ISME J 5:220-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.118.
17. Martínez I, Kim J, Duffy PR, Schlegel VL, Walter J. 2010. Resistant starches types 2 and 4 have differential effects on the composition of the fecal microbiota in human subjects. PLoS One 5:e15046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015046.
18. Dassa B, Borovok I, Ruimy-Israeli V, Lamed R, Flint HJ, Duncan SH, Henrissat B, Coutinho P, Morrison M, Mosoni P, Yeoman CJ, White BA, Bayer EA. 2014. Rumen cellulosomics: divergent fiber-degrading strategies revealed by comparative genome-wide analysis of six rumino-coccal strains. PLoS One 9:e99221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099221.
19. Ze X, Le Mougen F, Duncan SH, Louis P, Flint HJ. 2013. Some are more equal than others: the role of keystone species in the degradation of recalcitrant substrates. Gut Microbes 4:236-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/gmic.23998.
20. El Kaoutari A, Armougom F, Gordon JI, Raoult D, Henrissat B. 2013. The abundance and variety of carbohydrate-active enzymes in the human gut microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:497-504.
21. Flint HJ, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Louis P, Forano E. 2012. Microbial degradation of complex carbohydrates in the gut. Gut Microbes 3:289-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/gmic.19897.
22. Stam MR, Danchin EGJ, Rancurel C, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. 2006. Dividing the large glycosyl hydrolase family 13 into subfamilies: towards improved functional annotations of alpha-amylase-related proteins. Protein Eng Design Sel 19:555-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzl044.
23. Boraston AB, Healey M, Klassen J, Ficko-Blean E, Lammerts van Bueren A, Law V. 2006. A structural and functional analysis of α-glucan recognition by family 25 and 26 carbohydrate binding modules reveals a conserved mode of starch recognition. J Biol Chem 281:587-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509958200.
24. Rincon MT, Dassa FHJ, Travis AJ, Jindou S, Borovok I, Lamed R, Bayer EA, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Antonopoulos DA, Berg Miller ME, White BA. 2010. Abundance and diversity of dockerin-containing proteins in the fiber-degrading rumen bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD1. PLoS One 5 : e12476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012476.
25. Ben David Y, Dassa B, Borovok I, Lamed R, Koropatkin NM, Martens EC, White BA, Bernalier-Donadille A, Duncan SH, Flint HJ, Bayer EA, Moraïs S. 2015. Ruminococcal cellulosome systems from rumen to human. Environ Microbiol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12868.
26. Rincon MT, Ding S-Y, McCrae SI, Martin JC, Aurilia V, Lamed R, Shoham Y, Bayer EA, Flint HJ. 2003. Novel organization and divergent dockerin specificities in the cellulosome system of Ruminococcus flavefaciens. J Bacteriol 185:703-713.
27. Bayer EA, Lamed R, White BA, Flint HJ. 2008. From cellulosomes to cellulosomics. Chem Rec 8:364-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tcr.20160.
28. Rincon MT, Cepeljnik T, Martin JC, Lamed R, Barak Y, Bayer EA, Flint HJ. 2005. Unconventional mode of attachment of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens cellulosome to the bacterial cell wall. J Bacteriol 187:7569-7578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.187.22.7569-7578.2005.
29. Herbeck JL, Bryant MP. 1974. Nutritional features of the intestinal anaerobe Ruminococcus bromii. J Appl Microbiol 28:1018-1022.
30. Lopez-Siles M, Khan TM, Duncan SH, Harmsen HJ, Garcia-Gil LJ, Flint HJ. 2012. Cultured representatives of two major phylogroups of human colonic Faecalibacterium prausnitzii can utilize pectin, uronic acids, and host-derived substrates for growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 420-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06858-11.
31. Bayer EA, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. 1999. Cellulosome-like sequences in Archaeoglobus fulgidus: an enigmatic vestige of cohesin and dockerin domains. FEBS Lett 463:277-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(99)01634-8.
32. Voronov-Goldman M, Lamed R, Noach I, Borovok I, Kwiat M, Rosenheck S, Shimon LJ, Bayer EA, Frolow F. 2011. Non-cellulosomal cohesin from the hyper-thermophilic archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Proteins 79:50-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.22857.
33. Waldemarsson J, Areschoug T, Lindahl G, Johnsson E. 2006. The streptococcal Bir and Sir proteins define a family of surface proteins with leucine-rich repeats: camouflaging by other surface proteins. J Bacteriol 188:378-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.188.2.378-388.2006.
34. Lay C, Sutren M, Violaine Rochet V, Saunier K, Doré J, Rigottier-Gois L. 2005. Design and validation of 16S rRNA probes to enumerate members of the Clostridium leptum subgroup in human faecal microbiota. Environ Microbiol 7 :933-946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00763.x.
35. Walker AW, Duncan SH, Harmsen HJ, Holtrop G, Welling GW, Flint HJ. 2008. The species composition of the human intestinal microbiota differs between particle-associated and liquid phase communities. Environ Microbiol 10:3275-3283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01717.x.
36. Chassard C, Delmas E, Robert C, Bernalier-Donadille A. 2010. The cellulose-degrading microbial community of the human gut varies according to the presence or absence of methanogens. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74:205-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00941.x.
37. Robert C, Bernalier-Donadille A. 2003. The cellulolytic microflora of the human colon: evidence of microcrystalline cellulose-degrading bacteria in methane-excreting subjects. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 46:81-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00207-1.
38. Wegmann U, Louis P, Goesmann A, Henrissat B, Duncan SH, Flint HJ. 2014. Complete genome of a new Firmicutes species belonging to the dominant human colonic microbiota (“Ruminococcus bicirculans”) reveals two chromosomes and a selective capacity to utilize plant glucans. Environ Microbiol 16:2879-2890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12217.
39. Ding SY, Rincon MT, Lamed R, Martin JC, McCrae SI, Aurilia V, Shoham Y, Bayer EA, Flint HJ. 2001. Cellulosomal scaffoldin-like proteins from Ruminococcus flavefaciens. J Bacteriol 183:1945-1953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.6.1945-1953.2001.
40. White BA, Lamed R, Bayer EA, Flint HJ. 2014. Biomass utilization by gut microbiomes. Annu Rev Microbiol 68:279-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155618.
41. Turkenburg JP, Brzozowski AM, Svendsen A, Borchert TV, Davies GJ, Wilson KS. 2009. Structure of a pullulanase from Bacillus acidopullulyticus. Proteins 76:516-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prot.22416.
42. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. 1997. Gapped BLAST and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389-3402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.
43. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M. 2004. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 32: D277-D280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh063.
44. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.
45. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2725-2729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197.
46. Vodovnik M, Duncan SH, Reid MD, Cantlay L, Turner K, Parkhill J, Lamed R, Yeoman CJ, Miller ME, White BA, Bayer EA, Marinšek-Logar R, Flint HJ. 2013. Expression of cellulosome components and type IV pili within the extracellular proteome of Ruminococcus flavefaciens 007. PLoS One 8:e65333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065333.
47. Lever M. 1977. Carbohydrate determination with 4-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH)—effect of bismuth on reaction. Anal Biochem 81: 21-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(77)90594-2.