Clusterization and mapping of waste recycling science. Evolution of research from 2002 to 2012

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1431-1446

  Garechana, Gaizka ^a   Rio Belver, Rosa ^a   Cilleruelo, Ernesto ^a   Larruscain Sarasola, Jaso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

cluster analysis; information mapping; text mining

Indexed keywords

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; MAPPING; RECYCLING;

ADVANCED VISUALIZATIONS; ENERGY GENERATIONS; EXPERT ASSESSMENT; INFORMATION MAPPING; SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY; SIMILARITY MEASURE; TEXT MINING; WASTE RECYCLING;

WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84946118744     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23264     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. An, X.Y., &, Wu, Q.Q., (2011). Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting. Scientometrics, 88 (1), 133-144.
2. Bassecoulard, E., &, Zitt, M., (1999). Indicators in a research institute: A multi-level classification of scientific journals. Scientometrics, 44 (3), 323-345.
3. Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., &, Zitt, M., (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70 (3), 859-880.
4. Bhattacharya, S., &, Basu, P.K., (1998). Mapping a research area at the micro level using co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 43 (3), 359-372.
5. Boyack, K.W., &, Klavans, R., (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (12), 2389-2404.
6. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., &, Börner, K., (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64 (3), 351-374.
7. Börner, K., &, Theriault, T., (2013). Places & spaces mapping science. Retrieved from http://www.scimaps.org/
8. Börner, K., Chen, C., &, Boyack, K.W., (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual review of information science and technology, 37 (1), 179-255.
9. Callon, M., Courtial, J.P., &, Laville, F., (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22 (1), 155-205.
10. Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Mercier, S., Lewison, G., &, Mogoutov, A., (2006). Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research. European Journal of Cancer, 42 (18), 3140-3148.
11. Chang, S.B., (2012). Using patent analysis to establish technological position: Two different strategic approaches. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79 (1), 3-15.
12. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., &, Hou, J., (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (7), 1386-1409.
13. Cobo, M., Lõpez-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E., &, Herrera, F., (2010). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5 (1), 146-166.
14. Coulter, N., Monarch, I., &, Konda, S., (1998). Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49 (13), 1206-1223.
15. Demirbas, A., (2011). Waste management, waste resource facilities and waste conversion processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 52 (2), 1280-1287.
16. EBSCO Publishing. (2013). Green file. Retrieved from http://www.ebscohost.com/academic/greenfile
17. Elsevier B.V. (2013). What does Scopus cover ? Retrieved from http://www.info.sciverse.com/scopus/scopus-in-detail/facts
18. European Environment Agency. (2013). Environmental Terminology and Discovery Service (ETDS). Retrieved from http://glossary.en.eea.europa.eu/
19. Garechana, G., Rio-Belver, R., Cilleruelo, E., &, Gavilanes-Trapote, J., (2011). Visualizing the scientific landscape using maps of science. In, S. Sethi, M. Bogataj, &, L. Ros-McDonnell, (Eds.), Industrial engineering: Innovative networks (pp. 103-112). London, United Kingdom: Springer-Verlag.
20. Garechana, G., Rio-Belver, R., Cilleruelo, E., &, Gavilanes-Trapote, J., (2012a). Capturing waste recycling science. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81 (1), 250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.07.005.
21. Garechana, G., Rio-Belver, R., Cilleruelo, E., &, Gavilanes-Trapote, J., (2012b). Tracking the evolution of waste recycling research using overlay maps of science. Waste Management, 32 (6), 1069-1074.
22. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., &, Black, W., (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Hennig, C., (2008). Dissolution point and isolation robustness: robustness criteria for general cluster analysis methods. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 99 (6), 1154-1176.
24. Hennig, C., (2013). Flexible procedures for clustering (fpc). R package version 2.1.6.
25. IHOBE. (2013). IHOBE.net. Retrieved from http://www.ihobe.net/
26. Janssens, F., Leta, J., Glänzel, W., &, De Moor, B., (2006). Towards mapping library and information science. Information Processing & Management, 42 (6), 1614-1642.
27. Kandylas, V., Upham, S.P., &, Ungar, L.H., (2008). Finding cohesive clusters for analyzing knowledge communities. Knowledge and Information Systems, 17 (3), 335-354.
28. Klavans, R., &, Boyack, K.W., (2006). Identifying a better measure of relatedness for mapping science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (2), 251-263.
29. Kopcsa, A., &, Schiebel, E., (1998). Science and technology mapping: A new iteration model for representing multidimensional relationships. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49 (1), 7-17.
30. Leydesdorff, L., (1987). Various methods for the mapping of science. Scientometrics, 11 (5), 295-324.
31. Leydesdorff, L., &, Rafols, I., (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (2), 348-362.
32. Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., &, Hornik, K., (2012). Cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 1.14.3.
33. McCain, K.W., (1998). Neural networks research in context: A longitudinal journal cocitation analysis of an emerging interdisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 41 (3), 389-410.
34. Meila, M., (2007). Comparing clusterings-An information based distance. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 98 (5), 873-895.
35. Mohammadi, E., (2012). Knowledge mapping of the Iranian nanoscience and technology: a text mining approach. Scientometrics, 92 (3), 593-608.
36. Moya-Anegõn, F., (2010). La investigaciõn científica con visibilidad internacional de la Universidad del País Vasco (Scopus, 2003-2008). Leioa, Spain: Servicio Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco.
37. Muñoz-Leiva, F., Viedma-del-Jesús, M.I., Sánchez-Fernández, J., &, Lõpez-Herrera, A.G., (2012). An application of co-word analysis and bibliometric maps for detecting the most highlighting themes in the consumer behaviour research from a longitudinal perspective. Quality & Quantity, 46 (4), 1077-1095.
38. Noyons, C., (2005). Science maps within a science policy context. In, H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, &, U. Schmoch, (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 237-255). New York: Springer.
39. Noyons, E., (2001). Bibliometric mapping of science in a policy context. Scientometrics, 50 (1), 83-98.
40. Porter, A.L., &, Cunningham, S.W., (2005). Tech mining: Exploiting new technologies for competitive advantage. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
41. Ramani, K., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W.Z., Zhao, F., Sutherland, J., Handwerker, C., Thurston, D., (2010). Integrated sustainable life cycle design: a review. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132 (9), 1-15. doi: 10.1115/1.4002308
42. Rostaing, H., (1996). La bibliométrie et ses techniques. Toulouse, France: Sciences de la Société.
43. Rousseeuw, P.J., (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65.
44. Rousseeuw, P.J., &, Kaufman, L., (2005). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
45. Search Technology, Inc. (2013). The vantage point. Turn information into knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.thevantagepoint.com/
46. Thomson Reuters. (2013). INSPEC factsheet. Retrieved from http://thomsonreuters.com/products/ip-science/04-057/inspecfactsheet-1-08.pdf
47. University of Connecticut. (2013). Research database locator: Find articles & more. Retrieved from http://rdl.lib.uconn.edu/subjects/1898
48. US EPA. (2013). Environmental issues terms and acronyms. Retrieved from http://iaspub.epa.gov/sor-internet/registry/termreg/searchandretrieve/termsandacronyms/search.do
49. Van Eck, N.J., &, Waltman, L., (2008). Appropriate similarity measures for author co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59 (10), 1653-1661.
50. Van Eck, N.J., &, Waltman, L., (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (8), 1635-1651.
51. Van Eck, N.J., &, Waltman, L., (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84 (2), 523-538.
52. Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., &, Van den Berg, J., (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (12), 2405-2416.
53. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N.J., &, Noyons, E., (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4 (4), 629-635.
54. Zong, Q.J., Shen, H.Z., Yuan, Q.J., Hu, X.W., Hou, Z.P., &, Deng, S.G., (2012). Doctoral dissertations of Library and Information Science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 94 (2), 1-19.