Co-word analysis of the trends in stem cells field based on subject heading weighting

Scientometrics

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 133-144

  An, Xin Ying ^a   Wu, Qing Qiang ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL INFORMATION   (China)

^b XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Co word analysis; Information entropy; Research front; Strategic diagram; Subject heading weighting

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958721614     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0374-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bangrae, L., & Yong-il, J. (2008). Mapping Korea's national R& D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3-19.
2. Bauin, S., Michelet, B., Schweighoffer, M. G., & Vermeulin, P. (1991). Using bibliometrics in strategic analysis: "Understanding chemical reactions" at the CNRS. Scientometrics, 22(1), 113-137.
3. Callon, M., Courtial, J., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155-205.
4. Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191-235.
5. Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Sociology of science in the real world. London: Macmillan.
6. Courtial, J. P. (1986). Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: Technical issues and developments in methodology (pp. 189-210). London: The Macmillan Press.
7. Courtial, J. P., & Sigogneau, A. (2009). How to use scientific and technological information to reveal strategic technologies. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(1), 31-44.
8. Fabian, M., Mathäus, D., Fradkin, D., & Etienne, J. (2008). Anticipating annotations and emerging trends in biomedical literature. Proceeding of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. NY, USA: ACM New York.
9. Gray, R. M. (1990). Entropy and information theory (pp. 35-53). New York: Springer Verlag.
10. Law, J., Bauin, S., Courtial, J. P., & Whittaker, J. (1988). Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics, 14(3), 251-264.
11. Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Similarity measures, author cocitation analysis, and information theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(7), 769-772.
12. Qin, H. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133-159.
13. Tan, P. N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2006). Introduction to data mining (pp. 35-89). Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.
14. Xavier, P. (2005). Co-word analysis revisited: Modeling co-word clusters in terms of graph theory. Proceeding or ISSI, 2, 662-663.
15. Ying, J. (2006). A co-word analysis of bibliometrics in 1995 2004. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 25(4), 503-512.
16. Zhao, Y., & Karypis, G. (2002). Evaluation of hierarchical clustering algorithms for document datasets (pp. P515-P524). Virginia, USA: CIKM'02, McLean.