Cone beam computed tomography study of apical root resorption induced by herbst appliance

Journal of Applied Oral Science

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 479-485

  Schwartz, João Paulo ^a   Raveli, Taísa Boamorte ^a   de Almeida, Kélei Cristina Mathias ^a   Schwartz Filho, Humberto Osvaldo ^b   Raveli, Dirceu Barnabé ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTO AMARO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Activator appliances; Cone beam computed tomography; Root resorption

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE; HUMAN; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; ORTHODONTIC TOOTH MOVEMENT; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROOT RESORPTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH APEX;

ADOLESCENT; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROOT RESORPTION; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH APEX; TOOTH MOVEMENT TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84946023781     PISSN: 16787757     EISSN: 16787765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720150224     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Apajalahti S, Peltola JS. Apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment - a retrospective study. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:408-12.
2. Barnett GA, Higgins DW, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2008;78:361-9.
3. Blake M, Woodside DG, Pharoah MJ. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with the edgewise and Speed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108:76-84.
4. Brin I, Tulloch JFC, Koroluk L, Philips C. External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: a retrospective review of 1- versus 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:151-6.
5. Campos MJ, Silva KS, Gravina MA, Fraga MR, Vitral RW. Apical root resorption: The dark side of the root. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:492-8.
6. Castro I, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C. Contribution of cone beam computed tomography to the detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment in root-filled and vital teeth. Angle Orthod. 2014. Epub ahead of print.
7. Castro IO, Alencar AH, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C. Apical root resorption due to orthodontic treatment detected by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:196-203
8. Croft RS, Buschang PH, English JD, Meyer R. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:435-43.
9. El-Fateh T, Ruf S. Herbst treatment with mandibular cast splints - revisited. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:820-7.
10. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Alencar AH, Mattar R, Valladares Neto J, Azevedo BC, et al. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2009;35:1491-7.
11. Kinzinger GS, Savvaidis S, Gross U, Gülden N, Ludwig B, Lisson J. Effects of Class II treatment with a banded Herbst appliance on root lengths in the posterior dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:465-9.
12. Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2010;80:466- 73.
13. Lund H, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. Eur J Oral Sci. 2012;120:201-11.
14. Lund H, Gröndahl K, Hansen K, Gröndahl HG. Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. A prospective study using cone beam CT. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:480-7.
15. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:134-44.
16. Nasiopoulos AT, Athanasiou AE, Papadopoulos MA, Kolokithas G, Ioannidou I. Premolar root changes following treatment with the banded herbst appliance. J Orofac Orthop. 2006;67:261-71.
17. Obijou C, Pancherz H. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112:287-91.
18. Pancherz H. Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979;76:423-42.
19. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:104-13.
20. Pancherz H. History, background, and development of the Herbst appliance. Semin Orthod. 2003;9:3-11.
21. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8:215-28.
22. Ponder SN, Benavides E, Kapila S, Hatch NE. Quantification of external root resorption by low- vs high-resolution conebeam computed tomography and periapical radiography: A volumetric and linear analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:77-91.
23. Ruf S, Pancherz H. When is the ideal period for Herbst therapy - early or late? Semin Orthod. 2003;9:47-56.
24. Sameshima GT, Asgarifar KO. Assessment of root resorption and root shape: periapical vs panoramic films. Angle Orthod.fi 2001;71:185-9.
25. Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang PH. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:100-8.
26. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:138-47.
27. Von Bremen J, Pancherz H, Ruf S. Reduced mandibular cast splints an alternative in Herbst therapy? A prospective multicentre study. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:609-13.
28. Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, Shanker S, Kaizar EE. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:462-76
29. Weschler D, Pancherz H. Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: A cephalometric investigation. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:23-7.
30. Yu J, Shu K, Tsai M, Hsu J, Chang H, Tung K. A cone-beam computed tomography study of orthodontic apical root resorption. J Dent Sci. 2013;8:74-9.